Preferences of Ukrainian Agribusinesses Toward Sustainability Reporting for Financing of Green Recovery

Alemu, M.H., Mørkbak, M.R., Olsen, S.B., & Jensen, C.L. (2013). Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 54(3), 333–359. https://doi.org/10/mp4 Search in Google Scholar

Astarta Holding PLC. (2024). Sustainability Report 2023. https://astartaholding.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/astarta_ar2023-2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Barthold, D., Brah, A.T., Graham, S.M., Simoni, J.M., & Hauber, B. (2022). Improvements to Survey Design from Pilot Testing a Discrete-Choice Experiment of the Preferences of Persons Living with HIV for Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapies. The Patient, 15, 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00581-z Search in Google Scholar

Campoamor, N.B., Guerrini, C.J.,·Brooks, W.B.,·Bridges, J.F.P., & Crossnohere, N.L. (2024). Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers. The Patient –Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 17, 109–120 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z Search in Google Scholar

Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., & Nyborg, K. (2017). Social Norms, Morals and Self-Interest as Determinants of Pro--environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66, 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9964-3 Search in Google Scholar

De Brún, A., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C.I., Rodgers, H., Ford, G.A., Rudd, M., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., Teah, J.,& Thomso, R.G. (2018). A Novel Design Process for Selection of Attributes for Inclusion in Discrete Choice Experiments: Case Study Exploring Variation in Clinical Decision-Making About Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke. BMC Health Services Research, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3305-5 Search in Google Scholar

Deconinck, K., Jansen, M., & Barisone, C. (2023). Fast and Furious: The Rise of Environmental Impact Reporting in Food Systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 50(4), 1310–1337. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad018 Search in Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464 Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & Ruto, E. (2010). What Do Farmers Want From Agri-Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x Search in Google Scholar

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (n.d.). Ukraine Nuclear Safety Upgrade and Green Investments. EBRD. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/sectors/ukraine-nuclear-safety-upgrade--green-investments.html Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (n.d.-a). The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (n.d.-b). The Ukraine Facility. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-solidarity-ukraine/eu-assistance-ukraine/ukraine-facility_en Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2025). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en Search in Google Scholar

European Council. (2022). European Council Conclusions, 23-24 June 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/24/european-council-conclusions-23-24-june-2022 Search in Google Scholar

Gagalyuk, T., Chatalova, L., Kalyuzhnyy, O., & Ostapchuk, I. (2021). Broadening the Scope of Instrumental Motivations for CSR Disclosure: An Illustration for Agroholdings in Transition Economies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(4), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0210 Search in Google Scholar

Gagalyuk, T., Ostapchuk, I., Lapa, V., & Balmann, A. (2022). Why Did Ukraine Become a Key Player on the World Agri-Food Markets? An Enterprise-Level Perspective. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(3), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.343317 Search in Google Scholar

Gailhard, İ.U., Bojnec Š. (2015). Farm Size and Participation in Agri-Environmental Measures: Farm-Level Evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy, 46, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.002 Search in Google Scholar

Gębska, M., Grontkowska, A., Świderek, W., & Gołębiewska, B. (2020). Farmer Awareness and Implementation of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Different Types of Farms in Poland. Sustainability, 12(19), 8022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198022 Search in Google Scholar

German Economic Team. (2022). How to Implement a Green Reconstruction for Ukraine. Newsletter,166. Berlin Economics. https://www.german-economic-team.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/GET_UKR_NL_166_2022_en.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Helling, A.P., Conner, D.S., Heiss, S.N., & Berlin, L.S. (2015). Agriculture, 5(3), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5030879 Search in Google Scholar

Hervé, J.-J. (2024). European and Ukrainian Agriculture Are Mutually Complementary. Schuman Paper No. 755. Fondation Robert Schuman. https://server.www.robert-schuman.eu/storage/en/doc/questions-d-europe/qe-755-en.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Hess, S., & Palma, D. (2019). Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application. Journal of Choice Modelling, 32, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170 Search in Google Scholar

Hess, S., & Palma, D. (2019). Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application. Journal of Choice Modelling, 32, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170 Search in Google Scholar

Kernel Holding S.A. (n.d.) Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2023. https://www.kernel.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/FY2023_Kernel_Annual_Report.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Henry, N.W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Houghton Mifflin. Search in Google Scholar

Mamine, F., Fares, M., & Minviel, J.J. (2020). Contract Design for Adoption of Agrienvironmental Practices: A Meta-analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments. Ecological Economics, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106721 Search in Google Scholar

Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T, Glenk, K., Jacobsen J.B., Liebe, U., Olsen, S.B., Sagebiel, J., & Thiene, M. (2021). Econometric Modelling: Basics. In: P. Mariel, D. Hoyos, J. Meyerhoff, M. Czajkowski, T. Dekker, K. Glenk, J.B. Jacobsen, U. Liebe, S.B. Olsen, J. Sagebiel, M. Thiene, Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments (pp. 61–81). Springer Briefs in Economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3_5 Search in Google Scholar

McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Neyter, R., Dushko, D., Nivievskyi, O., & Stolnykovych, H. (2022). Agricultural War Losses Review Ukraine. Rapid Loss Assessment. Kyiv School of Economics. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Losses_report_issue1.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Nordic Environment Finance Corporation. (n.d.). Green Recovery for Ukraine. NEFCO. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://www.nefco.int/financing/municipalities-in-eastern-europe/green-recovery-ukraine Search in Google Scholar

Qi, D. (2002). Ngene: An Integrated Bioinformatics Platform for Analysis Application Sequence. Biotech Software & Internet Report, 3(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/152791602317250360 Search in Google Scholar

Riabchyn, O., & Kulaga, D. (2023). Green Recovery of Ukraine: Guidelines and Instruments for Decision-Makers. Kyiv School of Economics. https://www.undp.org/uk/ukraine/publications/zelene-vidnovlennya-ukrayiny-kerivnipryntsypy-ta-instrumenty-dlya-tykh-khto-ukhvalyuye-rishennya Search in Google Scholar

Schaafsma, M., Ferrini, S., & Turner, R.K. (2019). Assessing Smallholder Preferences for Incentivised Climate-Smart Agriculture Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Land Use Policy, 88, 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104153 Search in Google Scholar

Späti, K., Huber, R., Logar, I., & Finger, R. (2022). Incentivizing the Adoption of Precision Agricultural Technologies in Small-Scaled Farming Systems: A Choice Experiment Approach. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 1(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.22 Search in Google Scholar

Szinay, D., Cameron, R., Naughton, F., Whitty, J.A., Brown, J., Jones, A. (2021). Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.2196/32365 Search in Google Scholar

Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271 Search in Google Scholar

Unay Gailhard, İ., Bavorová, M., & Pirscher, F. (2014). Adoption of Agri-Environmental Measures by Organic Farmers: The Role of Interpersonal Communication. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.913985 Search in Google Scholar

Unay-Gailhard, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2015). Farm Size and Participation in Agri-Environmental Measures: Farm-Level Evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy, 46, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.002 Search in Google Scholar

Unay-Gailhard, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2016). Sustainable Participation Behaviour in Agri-Environmental Measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.003 Search in Google Scholar

Unay-Gailhard, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2019). The Impact of Green Economy Measures on Rural Employment: Green Jobs in Farms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.160 Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Development Programme. (2024, January 25). Global Environment Facility, UNDP Provide Aid to Polissia Nature Reserve Fund. UNDP Ukraine. https://www.undp.org/ukraine/press-releases/global-environment--facility-undp-provide-aid-polissia-nature-reserve-fund Search in Google Scholar

Wąs, A., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Zavalloni, M., Viaggi, D., Kobus, P., & Sulewski, P. (2021). In Search of Factors Determining the Participation of Farmers in Agri-Environmental Schemes – Does Only Money Matter in Poland? Land Use Policy, 101, 105190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105190 Search in Google Scholar

Weller, B.E., Bowen, N.K., & Faubert, S.J. (2020). Latent Class Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932 Search in Google Scholar

Zawojska, E., Bartczak, A., & Czajkowski, M. (2018). Disentangling the Effects of Policy and Payment Consequentiality and Risk Attitudes on Stated Preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.007 Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2022). Small-Scale Farmers’ Preference Heterogeneity for Green Agriculture Policy Incentives Identified by Choice Experiment. Sustainability, 14(10), 5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105770 Search in Google Scholar