<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Making a complex analysis of the problem in order to identify the root of its occurrence, is the process burdened with the risk of uncertainty. This risk is in case of the quality analysis, in which the choice and making a decision is not confirmed by reliable information (number). This risk is in case of the quality analysis, in which the choice and making a decision is not confirmed by reliable information (number). But these techniques do not include the risk of uncertainty, so their sequence should be expanded about the appropriate method, to take this into account. It was considered beneficial to demonstrate that this method is the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process method (FAHP). The aim of the study to implement the FAHP method in the sequence of traditional quality management techniques (Ishikawa diagram and 5Why method) and proposition new, not practiced yet the method to complex analysis of the problem and identify the root of its root cause. The subject of the study was the furniture front, on which the incompatibility was identified (shortened foil). From the categories to which the potential causes of the inadequate foil were assigned, by using the Ishikawa diagram and the FAHP method in an integrated manner, were defined the most important categories (method and machine) in a precise (numerical) way. Next, using the same tools, the relationship between the potential causes was analysed and selected the main causes of the problem. Then, by using the 5Why method the root of the problem was defined (lack of the new machine and failure to comply with labor standards). The obtained results could differ depending on the subjectivity, however, the method itself proved to be effective and can be used to solve other types of the problem.</p></abstract>

Making a complex analysis of the problem in order to identify the root of its occurrence, is the process burdened with the risk of uncertainty. This risk is in case of the quality analysis, in which the choice and making a decision is not confirmed by reliable information (number). This risk is in case of the quality analysis, in which the choice and making a decision is not confirmed by reliable information (number). But these techniques do not include the risk of uncertainty, so their sequence should be expanded about the appropriate method, to take this into account. It was considered beneficial to demonstrate that this method is the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process method (FAHP). The aim of the study to implement the FAHP method in the sequence of traditional quality management techniques (Ishikawa diagram and 5Why method) and proposition new, not practiced yet the method to complex analysis of the problem and identify the root of its root cause. The subject of the study was the furniture front, on which the incompatibility was identified (shortened foil). From the categories to which the potential causes of the inadequate foil were assigned, by using the Ishikawa diagram and the FAHP method in an integrated manner, were defined the most important categories (method and machine) in a precise (numerical) way. Next, using the same tools, the relationship between the potential causes was analysed and selected the main causes of the problem. Then, by using the 5Why method the root of the problem was defined (lack of the new machine and failure to comply with labor standards). The obtained results could differ depending on the subjectivity, however, the method itself proved to be effective and can be used to solve other types of the problem.

Identifying the source of the problem by using implemented the FAHP method in the selected quality management techniques

The Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics

Production Engineering Archives

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Making a complex analysis of the problem in order to identify the root of its occurrence, is the process burdened with the risk of uncertainty. This risk is in...

Identifying the source of the problem by using implemented the FAHP method in the selected quality management techniques

Online veröffentlicht: 13. Apr. 2020

Seitenbereich: 5 - 10

Eingereicht: 08. Jan. 2020

Akzeptiert: 31. März 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.02

Schlüsselwörter
Ishikawa diagram, FAHP, 5Why, incompatibility, quality management

© 2020 Dominika Siwiec et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Identifying the source of the problem by using implemented the FAHP method in the selected quality management techniques

Online veröffentlicht: 13. Apr. 2020

Seitenbereich: 5 - 10

Eingereicht: 08. Jan. 2020

Akzeptiert: 31. März 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.02

SchlüsselwörterIshikawa diagram, FAHP, 5Why, incompatibility, quality management

© 2020 Dominika Siwiec et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Ishikawa diagram, FAHP, 5Why, incompatibility, quality management