The Possible Impact of Urgenda and the Klimabeschluss on Climate Litigation on the Example of the Petition Pending Before the Hungarian Constitutional Court
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aust HP, ‘Klimaschutz aus Karlsruhe: Was verlangt der Beschluss vom Gesetzgeber?’ (2021/5/05) VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/klimaschutz-aus-karlsruhe-was-verlangt-das-urteil-vom-gesetzgeber/.AustHP2021505VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/klimaschutz-aus-karlsruhe-was-verlangt-das-urteil-vom-gesetzgeber/.Search in Google Scholar
Beckerman W and Pasek J, Justice, Posterity, and the Environment (Oxford University Press 2002).BeckermanWPasekJOxford University Press2002Search in Google Scholar
Beckerman W, ‘Intergenerational Justice’ (2004) 2 (2) Intergenerational Justice Review 1–5.BeckermanW’Intergenerational Justice’20042215Search in Google Scholar
Buser A, ‘Die Freiheit der Zukunft: Zum Klima-Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (2021/4/30) VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/die-freiheit-der-zukunft/.BuserA2021430VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/die-freiheit-der-zukunft/.Search in Google Scholar
Cox R, ‘A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands’ (2016) 34 (2) Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 143–163.CoxR‘A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands’2016342143163Search in Google Scholar
Eckes C, ‘Separation of Powers in Climate Cases: Comparing cases in Germany and the Netherlands’ (2021/5/10) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/separation-of-powers-in-climate-cases/.EckesC2021510VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/separation-of-powers-in-climate-cases/.Search in Google Scholar
Ekardt F, ‘Climate Revolution with Weaknesses’ (2021/5/08) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/climate-revolution-with-weaknesses/.EkardtF2021508VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/climate-revolution-with-weaknesses/.Search in Google Scholar
Gelinsky K and Fuchs M-C, ‘Bitte noch mehr: Rechtsprechungsdialog im Karlsruher Klimabeschluss‘ (2021/5/26) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/bitte-noch-mehr/.GelinskyKFuchsM-C2021526VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/bitte-noch-mehr/.Search in Google Scholar
Goldmann M, ‘Judges for Future: The Climate Action Judgment as a Postcolonial Turn in Constitutional Law?’ (2021/4/30) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/judges-for-future/.GoldmannM2021430VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/judges-for-future/.Search in Google Scholar
Gosseries A, ‘On Future Generations’ Future Rights’ (2008) 16 (4) The Journal of Political Philosophy 446–474.GosseriesA’On Future Generations’ Future Rights’2008164446474Search in Google Scholar
Láncos PL, ‘Flexibility and Legitimacy: The Emissions Trading System under the Kyoto Protocol’ in Armin Bogdandy et al. (eds.) The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law (Springer 2010) 271–299.LáncosPL‘Flexibility and Legitimacy: The Emissions Trading System under the Kyoto Protocol’inBogdandyArmin(eds.)Springer2010271299Search in Google Scholar
Láncos PL, ‘Passivist Strategies Available to the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2019) 79 (4) Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 971–993.LáncosPL‘Passivist Strategies Available to the Hungarian Constitutional Court’2019794971993Search in Google Scholar
Leijten I, ‘Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case’ (2019) 37 (2) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 112–118.LeijtenI‘Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case’2019372112118Search in Google Scholar
Minnerop P, ‘The ‘Advance Interference-Like Effect’ of Climate Targets: Fundamental Rights, Intergenerational Equity and the German Federal Constitutional Court’ (2022) 34 (1) Journal of Environmental Law 135–162.MinneropP‘The ‘Advance Interference-Like Effect’ of Climate Targets: Fundamental Rights, Intergenerational Equity and the German Federal Constitutional Court’2022341135162Search in Google Scholar
O Neill S and Alblas E, ‘Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland’ in Robbins David, Torney Diarmuid and Brereton Pat (eds), Ireland and the Climate Crisis. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication (Palgrave Macmillan 2020) 57–72.O NeillSAlblasE‘Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland’inRobbinsDavidTorneyDiarmuidBreretonPat(eds),Palgrave Macmillan20205772Search in Google Scholar
Rath K and Benner M, ‘Ein Grundrecht auf Generationengerechtigkeit? Die Relevanz des Klimaschutz-Beschlusses des Bundesverfassungsgerichts für andere Rechtsgebiete mit intergenerationaler Bedeutung’ (2021/5/07) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/ein-grundrecht-auf-generationengerechtigkeit/.RathKBennerM2021507VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/ein-grundrecht-auf-generationengerechtigkeit/.Search in Google Scholar
Saiger A-J, ‘The Constitution Speaks in the Future Tense: On the Constitutional Complaints Against the Federal Climate Change Act’ (2021/4/29) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/the-constitution-speaks-in-the-future-tense/.SaigerA-J2021429VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/the-constitution-speaks-in-the-future-tense/.Search in Google Scholar
Steinbeis M, ‘Ok, Boomer’ (2021/4/30) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/ok-boomer/.SteinbeisM2021430VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/ok-boomer/.Search in Google Scholar
Stohlmann B, ‘Keine Schutzpflicht vor zukünftigen Freiheitsbeschränkungen – warum eigentlich?’ (2021/5/04) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/keine-schutzpflicht-vor-zukunftigen-freiheitsbeschrankungen-warum-eigentlich/.StohlmannB2021504VerfBloghttps://verfassungsblog.de/keine-schutzpflicht-vor-zukunftigen-freiheitsbeschrankungen-warum-eigentlich/.Search in Google Scholar
Sulyok K, ‘A klímaperek kihívásai és sikerei’ (2020) 13 (1) Közjogi Szemle 1–7.SulyokK‘A klímaperek kihívásai és sikerei’202013117Search in Google Scholar
Sulyok K, Science and Judicial Reasoning: The Legitimacy of International Environmental Adjudication (Cambridge University Press 2020).SulyokKCambridge University Press2020Search in Google Scholar
Szabó M, ‘Az egészséges környezethez való jog anyagi jogi és eljárásjogi kérdései az Alkotmánybíróság újabb gyakorlatában’ (2022) 10 (2) Acta Humana 77–92.SzabóM’Az egészséges környezethez való jog anyagi jogi és eljárásjogi kérdései az Alkotmánybíróság újabb gyakorlatában’20221027792Search in Google Scholar
Szemesi S, ‘From Non-Derogation to the Duty to Progress. Key Elements of the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Case Law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2023) 11 (1) Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 335–348.SzemesiS‘From Non-Derogation to the Duty to Progress. Key Elements of the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Case Law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’2023111335348Search in Google Scholar
UNEP (2022) ‘The Closing Window: Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies.’ ISBN: 978-92-807-3979-4UNEP2022ISBN: 978-92-807-3979-4Search in Google Scholar
Wewerinke-Singh M and McCoach A, ‘The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for future rights-based climate litigation’ Review of European’ (2021) 30 (2) Comparative & International Environmental Law 275–283.Wewerinke-SinghMMcCoachA‘The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for future rights-based climate litigation’ Review of European’2021302275283Search in Google Scholar