Machina Ex Machina Artificially Intelligent Systems as Inventors under Polish Legal Framework

Abbott Ryan, ‘Everything is Obvious’ (2019) 66 UCLA Law Review AbbottRyan ‘Everything is Obvious’ 2019 66 UCLA Law Review 10.1017/9781108631761.006 Search in Google Scholar

Abbott Ryan, ‘I Think, therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law’ (2016) 57 Boston College Law Review AbbottRyan ‘I Think, therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law’ 2016 57 Boston College Law Review 10.2139/ssrn.2727884 Search in Google Scholar

Abbott Ryan, ‘Patenting the Output of Autonomously Inventive Machines’ (2017) 10 No. 1 Landslide AbbottRyan ‘Patenting the Output of Autonomously Inventive Machines’ 2017 10 1 Landslide Search in Google Scholar

Bottalico Barbara, ‘Cognitive Neuroscience, Decision Making and the Law’ (2011) 2 European Journal of Risk Regulation BottalicoBarbara ‘Cognitive Neuroscience, Decision Making and the Law’ 2011 2 European Journal of Risk Regulation 10.1017/S1867299X00001458 Search in Google Scholar

Bridy Annemarie, ‘Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author’ (2012) Stanford Technology Law Review BridyAnnemarie ‘Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author’ 2012 Stanford Technology Law Review 10.31235/osf.io/5ru6m Search in Google Scholar

Bringsjord Selmer, ‘Chess is Too Easy’ (1998) 101/2 Technology Review BringsjordSelmer ‘Chess is Too Easy’ 1998 101/2 Technology Review Search in Google Scholar

Buyers John, Artificial Intelligence. The Practical Legal Issues (Law Brief Publishing 2018). BuyersJohn Artificial Intelligence. The Practical Legal Issues Law Brief Publishing 2018 Search in Google Scholar

Clifford Ralpf D., ‘Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up?’ (1997) 71 Tulane Law Review CliffordRalpf D. ‘Intellectual Property in the Era of the Creative Computer Program: Will the True Creator Please Stand Up?’ 1997 71 Tulane Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Coase Ronald H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4 Economica CoaseRonald H. ‘The Nature of the Firm’ 1937 4 Economica 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x Search in Google Scholar

Cohen Aaron M., ‘Stephen Thaler's Imagination Machines’ (July–August 2009) 43(4) The Futurist 28 <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299169623_Stephen_Thaler's_Imagination_Machines> accessed 10 September 2019. Cohen AaronM. ‘Stephen Thaler's Imagination Machines’ July–August 2009 43 4 The Futurist 28 <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299169623_Stephen_Thaler's_Imagination_Machines> accessed 10 September 2019. Search in Google Scholar

Cope David, Computer Models of Musical Creativity (MIT Press 2005) CopeDavid Computer Models of Musical Creativity MIT Press 2005 Search in Google Scholar

David Levy, Robots Unlimited: Life in a Virtual Age (CRC Press 2005) DavidLevy Robots Unlimited: Life in a Virtual Age CRC Press 2005 10.1201/b10697 Search in Google Scholar

de Cock Buning Madeleine, ‘Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the EU Framework for Intellectual Property’ (2016) 7 European Journal of Risk Regulation de CockBuning Madeleine ‘Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the EU Framework for Intellectual Property’ 2016 7 European Journal of Risk Regulation 10.1017/S1867299X00005730 Search in Google Scholar

Denicola Robert C., ‘Ex Machina: Copyright Protection for Computer-Generated Works’ (2016) 69 Rutgers University Law Review DenicolaRobert C. ‘Ex Machina: Copyright Protection for Computer-Generated Works’ 2016 69 Rutgers University Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Dorotheou Emily, ‘Reap the Benefits and Avoid the Legal Uncertainty: Who Owns the Creations of Artificial Intelligence?’ (2015) 21(4) Computer and Telecommunications Law Review DorotheouEmily ‘Reap the Benefits and Avoid the Legal Uncertainty: Who Owns the Creations of Artificial Intelligence?’ 2015 21 4 Computer and Telecommunications Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Drahos Peter, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property Rights (Routledge 1996) DrahosPeter A Philosophy of Intellectual Property Rights Routledge 1996 Search in Google Scholar

du Vall Michał ‘Podmioty i prawa podmiotowe’ in Elżbieta. Traple (ed), Prawo Patentowe (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer Polska 2017) du VallMichał ‘Podmioty i prawa podmiotowe’ in Elżbieta Traple (ed), Prawo Patentowe 2nd edn Wolters Kluwer Polska 2017 Search in Google Scholar

Feldman Robin C., ‘Artificial Intelligence’ (2018) 21 Green Bag 2d FeldmanRobin C. ‘Artificial Intelligence’ 2018 21 Green Bag 2d 10.1016/B978-008045046-9.00434-4 Search in Google Scholar

Fisher William, ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Stephen Munzer (ed), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001) FisherWilliam ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in MunzerStephen (ed), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property Cambridge University Press 2001 Search in Google Scholar

Flint David, ‘Intelligence: The Artificial Way’ (2020) 41 Business Law Review FlintDavid ‘Intelligence: The Artificial Way’ 2020 41 Business Law Review 10.54648/BULA2020112 Search in Google Scholar

Franzoni Luigi Alberto and Kaushik Arun Kumar, ‘The Optimal Scope of Trade Secrets Law’ (2016) 45 International Review of Law and Economics FranzoniLuigi Alberto KaushikArun Kumar ‘The Optimal Scope of Trade Secrets Law’ 2016 45 International Review of Law and Economics 10.1016/j.irle.2015.11.004 Search in Google Scholar

Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 163 Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 163 Search in Google Scholar

Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 174 Grounds for the EPO decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 174 Search in Google Scholar

Kassan Peter, ‘AI Gone Awry: The Futile Quest for Artificial Intelligence’ (2006) 12 Skeptic Kohlhepp Peter M., ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ (2008) 93 Minnesota Law Review KassanPeter ‘AI Gone Awry: The Futile Quest for Artificial Intelligence’ 2006 12 Skeptic Search in Google Scholar

Kohlhepp Peter M., ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ (2008) 93 Minnesota Law Review KohlheppPeter M. ‘When the Invention is an Inventor: Revitalizing Patentable Subject Matter to Exclude Unpredictable Processes’ 2008 93 Minnesota Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Kostański Piotr, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in Piotr Kostański (ed), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (2 nd edn, CH Beck 2014) KostańskiPiotr ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in KostańskiPiotr (ed), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz 2 nd edn CH Beck 2014 Search in Google Scholar

Markiewicz Ryszard, ‘Sztuczna inteligencja i własność intelektualna’ in Alicja Adamczak (ed), 100 lat ochrony własności przemysłowej w Polsce. Księga jubileuszowa Urzędu Patentowego Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (Wolters Kluwer 2018) MarkiewiczRyszard ‘Sztuczna inteligencja i własność intelektualna’ in AdamczakAlicja (ed), 100 lat ochrony własności przemysłowej w Polsce. Księga jubileuszowa Urzędu Patentowego Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej Wolters Kluwer 2018 Search in Google Scholar

Markiewicz Ryszard, Ochrona prac naukowych (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1990) MarkiewiczRyszard Ochrona prac naukowych Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1990 Search in Google Scholar

Newell Allen, ‘Response: The Models Are Broken, The Models Are Broken!’ (1986) 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review NewellAllen ‘Response: The Models Are Broken, The Models Are Broken!’ 1986 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Preussner-Zamorska Janina, ‘Autorstwo projektu wynalazczego’ in Stafan Grzybowski and Andrzej Kopff (eds), Prawo Wynalazcze. Zagadnienia Wybrane (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1978) Preussner-ZamorskaJanina ‘Autorstwo projektu wynalazczego’ in GrzybowskiStafan KopffAndrzej (eds), Prawo Wynalazcze. Zagadnienia Wybrane Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1978 Search in Google Scholar

Preussner-Zamorska Janina, ‘Prawo do autorstwa wynalazku’ (1974) 2 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Preussner-ZamorskaJanina ‘Prawo do autorstwa wynalazku’ 1974 2 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Search in Google Scholar

Promińska Urszula, ‘Zagadnienia podmiotowe’ in Ewa Nowińska and Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (eds), System Prawa Handlowego, T. 3, Prawo własności przemysłowej (CH Beck 2015) PromińskaUrszula ‘Zagadnienia podmiotowe’ in NowińskaEwa Szczepanowska-KozłowskaKrystyna (eds), System Prawa Handlowego, T. 3, Prawo własności przemysłowej CH Beck 2015 Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson Pamela, ‘Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works’ (1986) 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review SamuelsonPamela ‘Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works’ 1986 47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Schank Roger and Owens Christopher, ‘The Mechanics of Creativity’ in Raymond Kurzweil (ed), The Age of Intelligent Machines (MIT Press 1990) SchankRoger OwensChristopher ‘The Mechanics of Creativity’ in KurzweilRaymond (ed), The Age of Intelligent Machines MIT Press 1990 Search in Google Scholar

Scherer Matthew U., ‘Regulating Artificial Intelligent Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies’ (2016) 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology SchererMatthew U. ‘Regulating Artificial Intelligent Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies’ 2016 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 10.2139/ssrn.2609777 Search in Google Scholar

Schuster W. Michael, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership’ (2018) 75 Washington and Lee Law Review SchusterW. Michael ‘Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership’ 2018 75 Washington and Lee Law Review Search in Google Scholar

Sołtysiński Stanisław, Prawo Wynalazcze. Komentarz (Instytut Wydawniczy Centralnej Rady Związków Zawodowych 1975) SołtysińskiStanisław Prawo Wynalazcze. Komentarz Instytut Wydawniczy Centralnej Rady Związków Zawodowych 1975 Search in Google Scholar

Staszków Michał, Prawo wynalazcze (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1989) StaszkówMichał Prawo wynalazcze Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1989 Search in Google Scholar

Stierle Martin, Artificial Intelligence Designated as Inventor – An Analysis of the Recent EPO Case Law (2020) 69(9) GRUR International StierleMartin Artificial Intelligence Designated as Inventor – An Analysis of the Recent EPO Case Law 2020 69 9 GRUR International 10.1093/grurint/ikaa105 Search in Google Scholar

Szajkowski Andrzej, Wynalazki wspólne. Aspekty prawne (Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich 1982) SzajkowskiAndrzej Wynalazki wspólne. Aspekty prawne Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich 1982 Search in Google Scholar

Szczepanowska-Kozłowska Krystyna, ‘Zagadnienia Podmiotowe’ in Ewa Nowińska, Urszula Promińska and Krystyna Szczepanowska-Kozłowska (eds), Własność przemysłowa i jej ochrona (Lexis Nexis 2014) Szczepanowska-KozłowskaKrystyna ‘Zagadnienia Podmiotowe’ in NowińskaEwa PromińskaUrszula Szczepanowska-KozłowskaKrystyna (eds), Własność przemysłowa i jej ochrona Lexis Nexis 2014 Search in Google Scholar

Szczotka Jerzy, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in Tomasz Demendecki and others (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015) SzczotkaJerzy ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 3’ in DemendeckiTomasz (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015 Search in Google Scholar

Szczotka Jerzy, ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 8’ in Tomasz Demendecki and others (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015) SzczotkaJerzy ‘Tytuł I. Przepisy ogólne. Art. 8’ in DemendeckiTomasz (eds), Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015 Search in Google Scholar

Szwaja Janusz and Kubiak-Cyrul Agnieszka, ‘Twórcy projektów wynalazczych’ in Ryszard Skubisz (ed), System Prawa Prywatnego, T. 14A, Prawo własności przemysłowej (CH Beck 2017) SzwajaJanusz Kubiak-CyrulAgnieszka ‘Twórcy projektów wynalazczych’ in SkubiszRyszard (ed), System Prawa Prywatnego, T. 14A, Prawo własności przemysłowej CH Beck 2017 Search in Google Scholar

UK IPO patent decision BL O/741/19 of 4 December 2019, <https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-challenge-decision-results/p-challenge-decision-results-bl?BL_Number=O/741/19> accessed 1 October 2020 UK IPO patent decision BL O/741/19 of 4 December 2019 <https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-challenge-decision-results/p-challenge-decision-results-bl?BL_Number=O/741/19> accessed 1 October 2020 Search in Google Scholar

USPTO decision of 22 April 2020 on Application No. 16/524,350, <https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/16524350_22apr2020.pdf> accessed 1 October 2020 USPTO decision of 22 April 2020 on Application No. 16/524,350 <https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/16524350_22apr2020.pdf> accessed 1 October 2020 Search in Google Scholar

Vertinsky Liza and Rice Todd M., ‘Thinking about Thinking Machines: Implications of Machine Inventors for Patent Law’ (2002) 8 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law VertinskyLiza RiceTodd M. ‘Thinking about Thinking Machines: Implications of Machine Inventors for Patent Law’ 2002 8 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Search in Google Scholar

William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Belknap Press 2003) LandesWilliam M. PosnerRichard A. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law Belknap Press 2003 10.2307/j.ctv1q3z2pn Search in Google Scholar

WIPO, Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence (WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1 REV.) 21 May 2020 <https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20_1_rev.pdf> accessed 1 October 2020. WIPO Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence (WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1 REV.) 21 May 2020 <https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20_1_rev.pdf> accessed 1 October 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Yanisky-Ravid Shlomit and Liu Xiaoqiong (Jackie), ‘When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: An Alternative Model for Patent Law at the 3A Era’ (2018) 39 Cardozo Law Review Yanisky-RavidShlomit LiuXiaoqiong (Jackie) ‘When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: An Alternative Model for Patent Law at the 3A Era’ 2018 39 Cardozo Law Review 10.2139/ssrn.2931828 Search in Google Scholar