The Free Trade Agreement and Investment Dispute Settlement Between the European Union and Vietnam: A Critical Assessment

[1] Judgment of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland No. 4A_616/2015 (20 Sep 2016), s. 3.2.2. Retrieved from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10121.pdf [accessed 27 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[2] McKenzie v. Vietnam, Award of 11 Dec 2013, p. 222. Retrieved from https://www.italaw.com/cases/2370 [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[3] RECOFI v. Viet Nam (2013). Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/554/recofi-v-vietnam [accessed 3 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dialasie v. Viet Nam (2011). Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/423/dialasie-v-vietnam [accessed 3 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[5] Toepfer v. Sao Mai [2011], Decision of the Appellate Court of the Supreme People’s Court of Vietnam in Hanoi.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Merrill and Ring Forestry L.P. v. Canada, Award, 31 March 2010, UNCITRAL-ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Phoenix Action Ltd. v. Czech Republic, ICSID Case No: ARB/06/05, Award of 15 April 2009, p. 107. Retrieved from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0668.pdf [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[8] Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Award of 27 Aug 2008, p. 144. Retrieved from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0671.pdf [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[9] Inceysa Vallisoletana SL v. El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award of 2 Aug 2006, p. 230. Retrieved from https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf [accessed 27 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[10] Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic (PCA-UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 17 March 2006)Search in Google Scholar

[11] Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, LCIA Case No UN 3467Search in Google Scholar

[12] Tecnicas Medioambeintales Tecmed SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ARB(AF)/00/2, 10 ICSID Rep 130Search in Google Scholar

[13] Typo Services Singapore Pte Ltd v. Leighton Contractors (Vietnam) Ltd [2003], Decision No.02/ PTDS, Decision of the Appellate Court of the Supreme People’s Court of Vietnam in Ho Chi Minh CitySearch in Google Scholar

[14] Energo – Novus Co (Russia) v. Vietnam Textile Corporation (Vinatext) [2000], Case No.58, Decision of the Appellate Court of the Supreme People’s Court of Vietnam in HanoiSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Metalcad v Mexico, Award, 25 August 2000, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/97/1, (2001) 40 ILM 36Search in Google Scholar

[16] Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (I) (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/2)Search in Google Scholar

[17] Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (II), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3 (NAFTA)Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chaisse J. & Nottage L. (ed.) (2018), International Investment Treaties and Arbitration Across Asia, Bril Nijhoff, Leiden10.1163/9789004360105Search in Google Scholar

[19] European Commission (2014), Trade for all: Towards a more responsible trade and investment policy, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM/2015/0497 final, p. 10. Retrieved from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/october/tradoc_153846.pdf [accessed 21 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jaswant S. S. (2019), ‘Establishment of investment court system under CETA and EU-Viet nam FTA and its compatibility with EU law’, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration, Study Paper No 02/19, pp. 65-66. Retrieved from https://europa-kolleg-hamburg.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Study-Paper-Shilpa-Singh-Jaswant.pdf [accessed 12 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[21] Leblond P. & Viju-Miljusevic C. (2019), ‘EU trade policy in the twenty-first century: change, continuity and challenges’, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 26(12), p. 1836. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501763.2019.1678059 [accessed 21 May 2020]10.1080/13501763.2019.1678059Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lenk H. (2016), ‘An Investment Court System for the New Generation of EU Trade and Investment Agreements: A Discussion of the Free Trade Agreement with Vietnam and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with Canada’, European Papers, Vol. 1(2) 665, p. 668. Retrieved from http://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/system/files/pdf_version/EP_EF_2016_I_033_Hannes_Lenk.pdf [accessed 9 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[23] Nguyen, T. T. & Vu, T. C. Q. (2014), ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement from the Perspective of Vietnam: Looking for a “Post-Honeymoon” Reform’, Transnational Dispute Management, Vol. 11, issue 1, p. 01. Retrieved from https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2041 [accessed 28 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[24] Perez S. (2018), ‘The Strategic Vision behind Vietnam’s International Trade Integration’, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Vol. 37, No. 02, p. 3–38. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/186810341803700201 [accessed 05 June 2020]10.1177/186810341803700201Search in Google Scholar

[25] Raz J. (1979), The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Clarendon10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[26] Turksen U. & Chau Q. (2019), ‘To sign or not to sign? A conundrum of Vietnam’s accession to the ICSID’ Coventry Law Journal, 24(1), 2. [1]Search in Google Scholar

[27] UNCTAD, ‘Reforming Investment Dispute Settlement: A Stocktaking’, IIA Issues Note, Mar 2019, Issue 1, p. 13. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diaepcbinf2019d3_en.pdf [accessed 12 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[28] Woolcock S. (2007), ‘European Union policy towards Free Trade Agreements’, ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03, p.11. Retrieved from http://www.felixpena.com.ar/contenido/negociaciones/anexos/2010-09-european-union-policy-towards-free-trade-agreements.pdf [accessed 22 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[29] Baldwin R. and Rigo D. (2018), ‘The Changing Paradigm of Trade in the 21st Century’, Global Challenges, The Graduate Institute Geneva, No. 3. Retrieved from https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/3/the-changing-paradigm-of-trade-in-the-21st-century/ [accessed 06 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[30] Bouet, A. & Laborde, D., ‘The potential cost of a failed Doha Round’, International Food Policy Research Institute Issue Brief 56 (Dec 2008), p.2. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_forum11_e/doha_to_securemarketaccess.pdf [accessed 21 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[31] Buchholz K. (2019), ‘Which Countries Have the Most Trade Agreements?’, Free Trade - Statista, 12 August 2019. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/chart/18991/countries-with-most-trade-agreements/ [accessed 30 January 2021]Search in Google Scholar

[32] Burkill S. (27 Apr 2020), ‘Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Vietnam’, Watson Farley & Williams. Retrieved from https://www.wfw.com/articles/enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-awards-in-vietnam/ [accessed 4 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[33] Çevik Ö., Şimşek C. & Safi Isik G. (24 July 2018), ‘Principle Of Good Faith in Determining the Jurisdiction of ICSID and Commentary on the Phoenix Case’, Mondaq. Retrieved from https://www.mondaq.com/turkey/arbitration-dispute-resolution/722160/principle-of-good-faith-in-determining-the-juristicdion-of-icsid-and-commentary-on-the-phoenix-case [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[34] CJEU Judgment (Grand Chamber) (Case C-284/16 of 5 March 2018). Retrieved from http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=199968&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1492350 [accessed 8 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

35] Croisant G. (29 Jan 2019), ‘CJEU Opinion 1/17 – AG Bot Concludes that CETA’s Investment Court System is Compatible with EU Law’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Retrieved from http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/01/29/cjeu-opinion-117-agbot-concludes-that-cetas-investment-court-system-is-compatible-with-eu-law/?doing_wp_cron=1591579574.1992878913879394531250 [accessed 8 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[36] EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: protecting European interests, ensuring fair competition, and continued cooperation in areas of mutual interest. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2531 accessed 30 January 2021; also see, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/948093/TCA_SUMMARY_PDF.pdf [accessed 30 January 2021]Search in Google Scholar

[37] Eurocham - Vietnam, ‘The EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement: Perspective from Vietnam’, 2019 EVFTA Report (Dec 2019). Retrieved from https://www.eurochamvn.org/The-EVFTA-Report [accessed 22 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[38] European Commission, ‘Countries and regions: Vietnam’. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/vietnam/ [accessed 19 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[39] European Commission, ‘Countries and regions: Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)’. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/regions/asean/ [accessed 19 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[40] European Commission, ‘EU Trade Policy at Work: Creating Opportunities, Standing for Europe’s Values and Interests – 2019’. Retrieved from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2019/october/tradoc_158400.pdf [accessed 06 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[41] European Commission (2009), ‘Explaining the Treaty of Lisbon’, MEMO/09/531. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/fr/MEMO_09_531 [accessed 06 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[42] European Commission, ‘Global Europe - Competing in the world - A contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy’, COM(2006) 567 final, 4 Oct 2006, p. 8. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0567:FIN:en:PDF [accessed 22 May 2020].Search in Google Scholar

[43] European Commission, ‘Negotiations and agreements’. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/negotiations-and-agreements/#_being-negotiated [accessed 19 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[44] European Council (20 Mar 2018), ‘Negotiating directives for a Convention establishing a multilateral court for the settlement of investment disputes’ 12981/17 ADD 1 DCL 1, Brussels, p.8. Retrieved from http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-12981-2017-ADD-1-DCL-1/en/pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[45] European Commission, ‘Overview of FTA and Other Trade Negotiations’, Updated February 2020. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/december/tradoc_118238.pdf [accessed 19 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[46] European Commission (12 Sep 2018), ‘President Jean Claude Junker’s State of the Union’. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-18-5808_en.htm [accessed 21 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[47] European Commission, ‘Singapore’, Countries and Regions. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/singapore/ [accessed 22 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[48] European Commission, Trade and Policy – Vietnam, 07 May 2020. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/vietnam/index_en.htm [accessed 06 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[49] European Commission (30 Apr 2019), ‘Trade: European Court of Justice confirms compatibility of Investment Court System with EU Treaties’, Press Release. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_2334 [accessed 8 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[50] European Parliament, ‘EP after the Lisbon treaty: Bigger role in shaping Europe’. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/powers-and-procedures/the-lisbon-treaty [accessed 22 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[51] European Parliament, ‘EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA)’, Legislative Train Schedule - A Balanced and Progressive Trade Policy to harness Globalisation. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-eu-vietnam-fta [accessed 22 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[52] European Parliament (04 July 2012), ‘European Parliament rejects ACTA’, Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20120703IPR48247/european-parliament-rejects-acta [accessed 2 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[53] Europe Parliament, ‘The European Union and the World Trade Organisation’, Fact Sheets on the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/161/the-european-union-and-the-world-trade-organisation [accessed 21 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[54] European Union, The Economy. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/figures/economy_en [accessed 06 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

[55] Eurostat (2019), ‘Word Trade in Goods and Services - 2019: An Overview’. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/World_trade_in_goods_and_services_-_an_overview [accessed 05 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[56] Djanic V. (22 Jan 2020), ‘ConocoPhillips and Perenco Settle BIT Case Against Vietnam’, IAReporter. Retrieved from https://www.iareporter.com/articles/conoco-and-perenco-settle-bit-case-against-vietnam/ [accessed 05 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[57] Hoekman B. & Puccio L. (2019), ‘EU Trade Policy: Challenges and Opportunities’, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS) Policy Papers, 2019/06, p. 01. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/61589/RSCAS%20PP%202019_06.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [accessed 21 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[58] Maniruzzaman M. (30 Apr 2012), ‘The Concept of Good Faith in International Investment Disputes – The Arbitrator’s Dilemma’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Retrieved from http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/04/30/the-concept-of-good-faith-in-international-investment-disputes-the-arbitrators-dilemma-2/?doing_wp_cron=1590563877.0344359874725341796875 [accessed 27 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[59] Nguyen M. D (6 Dec 2018), ‘Enforcement of arbitral awards and other aspects of international arbitration in Vietnam’, Seoul. Retrieved from https://adr.com.vn/upload/files/1130enforcementSeoul2018%20%5Bfor%20audiences%5D.pdf [accessed 4 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

[60] Nguyen P. D. (12 July 2016), ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in Investor-State Arbitration in Vietnam’, International Arbitration Asia. Retrieved from http://www.internationalarbitrationasia.com/vietnam-fair-and-equitable-treatment-in-investor-state-arbitration [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[61] Statista, European Union: share in global gross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity from 2014 to 2024. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/253512/share-of-the-eu-in-the-inflation-adjusted-global-gross-domestic-product/ [accessed 06 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[62] Sturgeon T. J. (May 2013), Global Value Chains and Economic Globalization - Towards a New Measurement Framework, Industrial Performance Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/7828051/8076042/Sturgeon-report-Eurostat.pdf [accessed 2 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[63] Submission of the European Union and its Member States to UNCITRAL Working Group III (18 Jan 2019). Retrieved from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2019/january/tradoc_157632.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[64] Tran N-H. T. (12 Aug 2017), ‘The Swiss Federal Tribunal’s decision in Recofi v. Vietnam: a case study’, Lalive (Ho Chi Minh City). Retrieved from https://newsite.lalive.law/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/12.08.2017_NhuHoangTranThang12Aug2017_ENVN.pdf [accessed 27 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[65] Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, OJ C 306 (17 Dec 2007).Search in Google Scholar

[66] Tuoi Tre News (31Aug 2017), ‘Vietnamese government promises transparency in businessman’s lawsuit’. Retrieved from https://tuoitrenews.vn/news/business/20170831/vietnamese-government-promises-transparency-in-businessmans-lawsuit/41277.html [accessed 6 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[67] Trinh B. D. (28 Oct 2019), ‘From Trinh Vinh Binh to EUVIPA: Vietnam’s Meritorious Step towards Transparency in ISDS’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Retrieved from http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/10/28/from-trinh-vinh-binh-to-euvipavietnams-meritorious-step-towards-transparency-in-isds/?doing_wp_cron=1590325159.9102120399475097656250 [accessed 24 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[68] Turner G. (20 Aug 2018), ‘Analysis: How rich oil firms are using secretive court to fight capital gains tax in developing world’, Finance Uncovered. Retrieved from https://www.financeuncovered.org/tax-havens/analysis-how-rich-oil-firms-are-using-secretive-court-to-fight-capital-gains-tax-in-developing-world/ [accessed 05 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[69] UNCTAD, ‘ConocoPhillips and Perenco v. Viet Nam’, Investment Policy Hub. Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/906/conocophillips-and-perenco-v-viet-nam [accessed 05 June 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[70] UNCTAD (2012), ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement II, UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2011/5, pp. 90-92. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf [accessed 3 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[71] UNCTAD (2010), ‘McKenzie v. Viet Nam’, Investment Policy Hub. Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/382/mckenzie-v-viet-nam [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[72] UNCTAD, ‘Trinh Vinh Binh and Binh Chau JSC v. Viet Nam (II)’ (PCA Case No. 2015-23), Investment Policy Hub. Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/785/trinh-and-bin-chau-v-viet-nam-ii- [accessed 24 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[73] UNCTAD, ‘Trinh Vinh Binh and Binh Chau Joint Stock Company v. Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (I)’, Investment Policy Hub. Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/168/trinh-and-binh-chau-v-viet-nam-i-[accessed 24 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[74] UNCTAD, ‘Vietnam’, Investment Policy Hub. Retrieved from https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/229/viet-nam/respondent [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[75] United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, Final Act and Related Documents, Havana (21 Nov 1947 to 24 Mar 1948). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/havana_e.pdf [accessed 27 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[76] Vietnam Ministry of Justice, Press Release dated 12 Apr 2019. Retrieved from https://moj.gov.vn/qt/thongtinbaochi/Lists/ThongCaoBaoChiVeCacSuKien/Attachments/34/Thong%20cao%20bao%20chi.pdf [accessed 6 Jun 2020]Search in Google Scholar

[77] Vietnam News (15 Dec 2018), ‘Vietnam courts should be more prepared to handle foreign investor v. State investment disputes’. Retrieved from https://vietnamnews.vn/politics-laws/482114/viet-nam-courts-should-be-more-prepared-to-handle-foreign-investor-v-state-investment-disputes.html [accessed 26 May 2020]Search in Google Scholar