<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The article investigates the recent (2000–2019) mainland Chinese historiography on the Sinocentric tributary system of the Míng and Qīng periods (1368–1912). The theoretical approach of the article is based on Foucauldian discourse theory, as well as Chinese theoretical scholarship on the evolution of Chinese thought. Its methodology is primarily based on Reiner Keller’s sociological discourse research method. The main body of the article is structured upon the major fields of argumentation of the discourse, identified by the author as “the validity of the term ‘tributary system,’” “the tributary system and pre-modern Chinese culture,” “the tributary system and Míng-Qīng Chinese socio-economic history,” and “the tributary system and the regional political order.” The article argues that the ‘discursive struggle’ in recent historiography on the tributary system is primarily a result of its contested interpretation and evaluation under current dominant framings of an ideal international order—one centred around the principles of national sovereignty and “win-win” economic cooperation.</p></abstract>

The article investigates the recent (2000–2019) mainland Chinese historiography on the Sinocentric tributary system of the Míng and Qīng periods (1368–1912). The theoretical approach of the article is based on Foucauldian discourse theory, as well as Chinese theoretical scholarship on the evolution of Chinese thought. Its methodology is primarily based on Reiner Keller’s sociological discourse research method. The main body of the article is structured upon the major fields of argumentation of the discourse, identified by the author as “the validity of the term ‘tributary system,’” “the tributary system and pre-modern Chinese culture,” “the tributary system and Míng-Qīng Chinese socio-economic history,” and “the tributary system and the regional political order.” The article argues that the ‘discursive struggle’ in recent historiography on the tributary system is primarily a result of its contested interpretation and evaluation under current dominant framings of an ideal international order—one centred around the principles of national sovereignty and “win-win” economic cooperation.

A Discourse Analysis of Recent Mainland Chinese Historiography on the Sinocentric Tributary System of the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912)

Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The article investigates the recent (2000–2019) mainland Chinese historiography on the Sinocentric tributary system of the Míng and Qīng periods (1368–1912)....

A Discourse Analysis of Recent Mainland Chinese Historiography on the Sinocentric Tributary System of the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912)

Online veröffentlicht: 13. Sept. 2020

Seitenbereich: 149 - 176

Eingereicht: 11. Nov. 2019

Akzeptiert: 07. Mai 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjeas-2020-0006

Schlüsselwörter
tributary system, discourse analysis, Ming China, Qing China, East Asian history

© 2020 Sebestyén Hompot, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

A Discourse Analysis of Recent Mainland Chinese Historiography on the Sinocentric Tributary System of the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912)

Online veröffentlicht: 13. Sept. 2020

Seitenbereich: 149 - 176

Eingereicht: 11. Nov. 2019

Akzeptiert: 07. Mai 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjeas-2020-0006

Schlüsselwörtertributary system, discourse analysis, Ming China, Qing China, East Asian history

© 2020 Sebestyén Hompot, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
tributary system, discourse analysis, Ming China, Qing China, East Asian history