Synthesis and HPLC Enantioseparation of Derivatives of the 3-hydroxyphenylethanone

Abe I, Nishiyama T, Nakahara T, Frank H. Gas chromatographic enantiomer separation of pharmaceuticals on capillary columns coated with novel chiral polysiloxanes. J Chromatogr A. 1995;694:237-243. 10.1016/0021-9673(94)00835-WSearch in Google Scholar

Aboul-Enein HY, Bakr SA. Enantiomeric resolution of propranolol and analogs on two cellulose (Chiralcel of and OC) and one amylose (Chiralpak Ad) chiral stationary phases. J Liq Chrom Relat Tech. 1998;8:1137-1145. 10.1080/10826079808006589Search in Google Scholar

Beck GM, Neau SH. Optimization of lambda-carrageenan as a chiral selector in capillary electrophoresis separations. Chirality. 2000;12:614-20. 10.1002/1520-636X(2000)12:8<614::AID-CHIR3>3.0.CO;2-DSearch in Google Scholar

Bhushan R, Arora M. Direct enantiomeric resolution of (±) atenolol, (±) metoprolol, and (±) propranolol by impregnated TLC using L-aspartic acid as chiral selector. Biomed Chrom. 2003;17:226-230. 10.1002/bmc.216Search in Google Scholar

Bhushan R, Tanwar S. Direct TLC resolution of atenolol and propranolol into their enantiomers using different chiral selectors as impregnating reagents. Biomed Chrom. 2008;22:1028-1034. 10.1002/bmc.1025Search in Google Scholar

Bruchata K, Čižmarikova R, Polakovičova M, Hroboňova K, Pastirova Z. Synthesis, conformational study and HPLC enantioseparation of nitrophenoxyaminopropanols. Acta Facult Pharm Univ Comeniaenae. 2010;57:24-32. Search in Google Scholar

Čižmarikova R, Bruchata K, Pastirova Z, Lehotay J, Hroboňova K. HPLC and TLC enantioseparation of the nitro-positioned aryloxysubstituted aminopropanols. Pharmazie. 2010;65:387-388. Search in Google Scholar

Čižmarikova R, Račanska E, Hroboňova K, Lehotay J, Aghova Z, Halešova D. Synthesis, pharmacological activity and chromatographic separation of some novel potential β-blockers of the aryloxyaminopropanol type. Pharmazie. 2003;58:237-241.Search in Google Scholar

Donnecke J, Paul C, Konig WA, Svensson LA, Gyllenhaal O, Vessman J. Immobilization of heptakis 6-O-terc-butyldimethylsilyl-2,3-O-methyl)-β-cyclodextrin for capillary gas chromatography and SFC and micro-liquid chromatography. J Microcolumn Sep. 1996;8:495-505. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(1996)8:7<495::AID-MCS6>3.0.CO;2-XSearch in Google Scholar

Gyllenhaal O, Konig WA, Vessman J. Enantiomer separation of metoprolol and its analogues and metabolites by capillary column gas chromatography after derivatization with phosgene. J Chromatogr A. 1985;350:328-331.10.1016/S0021-9673(01)93537-XSearch in Google Scholar

Haginaka J, Okazaki Y, Matsunaga H. Separation of enantiomers on a chiral stationary phase based on ovoglycoprotein. V. Influence of immobilization method on chiral resolution. J Chromatogr A. 1999;840:171-181. 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00187-9Search in Google Scholar

Henriksson H, Petterson G, Johansson G. Discrimination between enantioselective and non-selective binding sites on cellobiohydrolase-based stationary phases by site specific competing ligands. J Chromatogr A. 1999;857:107-115. 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00776-1Search in Google Scholar

Hroboňova K, Lehotay J, Čižmarikova R. HPLC enantioseparation of potential β- blockers of the aryloxyaminopropanol type. Pharmazie. 2004;59:828-832. Search in Google Scholar

Hroboňova K, Lehotay J, Čižmarikova R. HPLC separation of enantiomers of some potential β-blockers of the aryloxyaminopropanol type using macrocyclic antibiotic chiral stationary phases. Pharmazie. 2005;60:888-891. Search in Google Scholar

Juvancz Z, Grolimund K, Schurig V. Pharmaceutical application of a bonded cyclodextrin stationary phase. J Microcolumn Sep. 1993;5:459-468. 10.1002/mcs.1220050510Search in Google Scholar

Makamba H, Andrisano V, Gotti R, Cavrini V, Felix G. Sparteine as mobile phase modifier in the chiral separation of hydrophobic basic drugs on an α1-acid glycoprotein column. J Chromatogr A. 1998;818:43-52. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00533-0Search in Google Scholar

Matchett MW, Branch SK, Jefferies TM. Polar organic chiral separation of propranolol and analogues using a β-cyclodextrin bonded stationary phase. Chirality. 1996;8:126-130. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(1996)8:1<126::AID-CHIR18>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

Park KL, Kim KH, Jung SH, Lim HM, Hong CH, Kang JS. Enantioselective stabilization of inclusion complexes of metoprolol in carboxymethylated β-cyclodextrin. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal. 2000;27:569-576. 10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00580-5Search in Google Scholar

Petersen PV, Ekelund J, Olsen L, Ovesen SV. Chiral separations of β-blocking drug substances using Pirkle-type α-Burke 1 chiral stationary phase. J Chromatogr A. 1997;757:65-71. 10.1016/S0021-9673(96)00677-2Search in Google Scholar

Proksa B. Capillary zone electrophoretic separation of (R,S)-metipranolol and related substances. Pharmazie. 1999;54:431-434.Search in Google Scholar

Proksa B, Čižmarikova R. Separation of β-adrenolytics derivated from 4- hydroxyacetophenone by capillary electrophoresis in the presence of cyclodextrins. Anal Chim Acta. 2001;434:75-79. 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00804-2Search in Google Scholar

Rastogi SN, Anand N, Gupta PP, Sharma JN. Agents acting on the central nervous system. 19. (±)-1-(o- and m-Alkanoylphenoxy)-3-(N4-arylpiperazinyl)propan-2-ols as local anesthetics, hypotensives, and tranquilizers. J Med Chem. 1973;16:797-804. 10.1021/jm00265a012Search in Google Scholar

Sharma SC, Evans MB, Evans SJ. The enantiomeric separation of metipranolol and desacetylmetipranolol on a cellulose tris-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate chiral stationary phase. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1995;13:129-137. 10.1016/0731-7085(94)00141-NSearch in Google Scholar

Valentova J, Čižmarikova R, Bui TTT, Drake AF, Hutt AJ. Enantiomeric resolution of novel aryloxyaminopropanol derivatives with β-adrenoceptor antagonist activity on a derivatised amylose chiral stationary phase. Chromatographia. 2003;58:733-740. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang H, Shao H, Youmei A, Zhang Z. Optimized conditions of enantioseparation of β- blockers by CZE using carboxymethyl β-cyclodextrin as chiral selector. Chromatographia. 2008;68:653-658.10.1365/s10337-008-0747-7Search in Google Scholar