Human Capital and Innovativeness as Means to Bridging Development Gaps. Poland and the Czech Republic as Case Studies

ACEMOGLU, D., AGHION, P., ZILIBOTTI, F. (2006). Distance to Frontier, Selection and Economic Growth, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 37-74.Search in Google Scholar

ANTONIUK, L.L., PORUCZNIK, A.M., SAWCZUK, W.S. (2003). Innowacij: teoria, miechanizm rozrobki ta komercjalizacji. Ministerstwo Oswiti i Nauki Ukrainy, Kijow: Kijwskij Nacjonalnij Ekonomicznij Uniwersytet. ISBN 966-574-514-X.Search in Google Scholar

BIEŃKOWSKI, W., RADŁO, M.J. (red.) (2006). Amerykański model rozwoju gospodarczego: Istota, efektywność i możliwości rozwoju. Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa. ISBN 978-837378-222-8.Search in Google Scholar

CASTELS, M. (2008). Społeczeństwo sieci. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN. ISBN 978-83-01-15148-5.Search in Google Scholar

COASE, R. (1935). The Nature of the Firm, Economica, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 386-405.Search in Google Scholar

DRUCKER P.F. (1999). Społeczeństwo pokapitalistyczne. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN. ISBN 83-01-12799-6.Search in Google Scholar

EDVINSSON, L. MALONE, M.S. (2001). Kapitał intelektualny. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN. ISBN 83-01-13509-3Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2004). Facing the challenge, The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/pdf/kok_report_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2008). European Innovation Scoreboard 2007-Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, Brussels: Pro Inno Europe. Rertieved from http://www.proinno-europe.eu/metricsSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2009). European Innovation Scoreboard 2008-Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, Brussels: Pro Inno Europe. Rertieved from http://www.proinno-europe.eu/metricsSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2010). European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) 2009. Brussels: Pro Inno Europe. Rertieved from http://www.proinno-europe.eu/metricsSearch in Google Scholar

FUKUYAMA, F. (2000). Wielki wstrząs. Natura ludzka a odbudowa porządku społecznego. Warszawa: Politeja. ISBN 83-7227-481-9.Search in Google Scholar

KAM (2005). The Knowledge for Development (K4D). Global Ranking. Washington: The World Bank Group. Retrieved September 19, 2006 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/kam/kei_table.aspSearch in Google Scholar

KAM (2007). The Knowledge for Development (K4D). KEI and KI Indexes. Washington: The World Bank Group (August). Retrieved December 18, 2007 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/kam2/KAM_page5.aspSearch in Google Scholar

KAM (2008). The Knowledge for Development (K4D). KEI and KI Indexes. Washington: The World Bank Group (Oktober). Retrieved January 5, 2009 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/kam2/KAM_page5.aspSearch in Google Scholar

KAM (2009a). The Knowledge for Development (K4D). KEI and KI Indexes. Washington: The World Bank Group (July). Retrieved April 21, 2009 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/kam2/KAM_page5.aspSearch in Google Scholar

KAM (2009b). The Knowledge for Development (K4D). KEI and KI Indexes. Washington: The World Bank Group (July). Retrieved April 21, 2009 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/kam2/KAM_page3.aspSearch in Google Scholar

KUKLIŃSKI, A. (red.). (2001). Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy. Wyzwanie dla Polski XXI wieku. Warszawa: KBN. ISBN 83-85557-87-3.Search in Google Scholar

KUKLIŃSKI A., PAWŁOWSKI K., WOŹNIAK J. (red.) (2009). Kreatywna i innowacyjna Europa wobec wyzwań XXI wieku, Kraków: Urząd Marszałkowski. ISBN 978-83-61355-31-1.Search in Google Scholar

LEWIS, W.W. (2005) Potęga wydajności. Warszawa: CeDeWu. ISBN 83-87885-92-4.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Aducational Resources. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/7/38654317.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

PORTER, M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Tree Press. ISBN 0-684-84147-9.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1Search in Google Scholar

Report on capital…, (2008). Raport o kapitale intelektualnym Polski 2008. Warszawa: GUS, SGH. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://www.nf.pl/News/13387/Search in Google Scholar

ROMER, P. (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 1002-1037.Search in Google Scholar

SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1960). Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

SKOKAN, K. (2007). Klastry v transformaci regionu - pet let pote, MPRA Paper, No. 12379, pp. 14.Search in Google Scholar

SOLOW, R. M. (1956). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function, Review of Economics and Statictics, Vol. 39, pp. 312-320.Search in Google Scholar

STIGLITZ, J.E. (1999). Knowledge for Development: Economic Science, Economic Policy, and Economic Advice, [in:] Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1998, (eds.) PLESKOVIC, B. STIGLITZ, J.E. Washington: World Bank 1999 (April), pp. 9-58. ISBN: 978-0-8213-4321-0.Search in Google Scholar

WERESA, M.A. (ed.). (2006). POLAND Competitiveness Report 2006. The Role of Innovation. Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa. ISBN 978-83-7378-234-1.Search in Google Scholar

WHITLEY, R. (2008). Varieties of Knowledge and Their Use in Business and Management Studies: Conditions and Institutions. Organization Studies, Vol 29, No. 4, pp. 581-609.10.1177/0170840607088152Search in Google Scholar

WILLIAMSON, O.E. (1998). Ekonomiczne instytucje kapitalizmu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ISBN 83-01-12392-3.Search in Google Scholar

WOŹNIAK, M.G. (2008). Wzrost gospodarczy. Podstawy teoretyczne. Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie. ISBN 978-83-7252-419-5.Search in Google Scholar

ZAK, P.J., KNACK, S. (2001). Trust and Growth, The Economic Journal, Vol. 111, No. 470 (April), pp. 295-321.Search in Google Scholar