1. bookVolumen 4 (2011): Heft 2 (December 2011)
    Law and Public Management Revisited
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Aug 2009
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Rule of Law or Law Overruled ? Why the Rule of Law Should Be on the Public Administration Research Agenda

Online veröffentlicht: 16 May 2013
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 4 (2011) - Heft 2 (December 2011) - Law and Public Management Revisited
Seitenbereich: 23 - 37
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Aug 2009
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

Allison, J. W. F. 2007. The English Historical Constitution. Continuity, Change andEuropean Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619373Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, W. and F. Van Waarden. 1999. Ruimte rond regels: Stijlen van regulering enbeleidsuitvoering bekeken. Amsterdam: Boom.Search in Google Scholar

Bardach, E. and R. A. Kagan. 2010. Going by the Book: The Problem of RegulatoryUnreasonableness. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Carlens, I. and B. Verbeeck. 2007. “Protecting the Citizen, Protecting the Local Administration: The Flemish Case.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of EGPA Study Group on Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, P. J. 2007. Public Law & Public Administration. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar

De Groot-Van Leeuwen, L. E., A. M. van den Bossche and Y. Buruma (eds). 2006.Search in Google Scholar

De ongehoorzame rechter: Rechters versus andere rechters, de wetgever, de bevolkingen het Europees recht. Deventer: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, P. O. and M. Herweijer. 2004. Alle regels tellen: De ontwikkeling van het aantalwetten, AmvB’s en ministeriële regelingen in Nederland. Den Haag: Boom.Search in Google Scholar

Finer, S. E. 1999. The History of Government from the Earliest Times. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207900.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, M. D. A. 2001. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, L. 1994. Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Glendon, M. A., M. W. Gordon and C. Osakwe. 1994. Comparative Legal Traditions:Text, Materials and Cases. St. Paul: West Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, H. P. 2010. Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/he/9780199580804.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Greenawalt, K. 1998. Law and Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, K. 2002. Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a RegulatoryAgency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243891.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, R. H. and C. G. Rosberg. 1982. Personal Rule in Black Africa: Prince, Autocrat,Prophet, Tyrant. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520313071Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, R. A. 1978. Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-price Freeze. New York: Russell Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. 1983. Reine Rechtslehre. Wien: Deuticke.Search in Google Scholar

Koopmans, T. 2003. Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511522253Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, L. E. 2009. “Restoring the Rule of Law to Public Administration: What Frank Goodnow Got Right and Leonard White Didn’t.” Public Administration Review 69, 803-812.Search in Google Scholar

Nonet, Ph. and Ph. Selznick. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward ResponsiveLaw. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 2007. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership.10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftwSearch in Google Scholar

Harvard: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Painter, M. and B. G. Peters (eds). 2010. Tradition and Public Administration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230289635Search in Google Scholar

Pakes, F. 2004. Comparative Criminal Justice. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A ComparativeAnalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pressman, J. L. and A. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Seerden, R. J. G. H. (ed.). 2007. Administrative Law of the European Union, its MemberStates and the United States: A Comparative Analysis. Antwerp: Intersentia.Search in Google Scholar

Tamanaha, B. Z. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511511073Search in Google Scholar

Waarden, F. van. 1999. “Ieder land zijn eigen trant?” In Bakker & Van Waarden 1999, 303-339.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. Q. 1991. Bureaucracy. What Government Agencies Do and Why They DoIt. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Zouridis, S. 2009. De dynamiek van bestuur en recht: Over de rechtsstaat als bestuurswetenschappelijkfenomeen. Den Haag: Lemma. Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo