A Systematic Overview of Decision-Making on Public Transport Systems Using Bibliometric Analysis on Vosviewer

1 Awasthi, A., Chauhan, SS., Omrani, H., Panahi, A. (2011) A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 637–646. Search in Google Scholar

2 Awasthi, A., Omrani, H., Gerber, P. (2018) Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 16, 247–259. Search in Google Scholar

3 Badami, M.G, Haider, M. (2007) An analysis of public bus transit performance in Indian cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(10), 961–981. Search in Google Scholar

4 Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A., Pagliara, F., Montanino, M. (2015) A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transport Policy, 38, 27–39. Search in Google Scholar

5 Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T. (2014) A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transport Policy, 36, 283–293. Search in Google Scholar

6 Chen, H., Jia, B., Lau, S.S.Y. (2008) Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: Challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat International, 32(1), 28–40. Search in Google Scholar

7 Curtis, C., Scheurer, J. (2010) Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making. Progress in Planning, 74(2), 53–106. Search in Google Scholar

8 De Bruijn, H., Veeneman, W. (2009) Decision-making for light rail. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(4), 349–359. Search in Google Scholar

9 Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G. (2011) A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Policy, 18(1), 172–181. Search in Google Scholar

10 Ghorbanzadeh, O., Moslem, S., Blaschke, T., Duleba, S. (2018) Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Considering Different Stakeholder Groups by an Interval-AHP Decision Support Model. Sustainability, 11(1), 9. Search in Google Scholar

11 Hassan, M.N., Hawas, Y.E., Ahmed, K. (2013) A multi-dimensional framework for evaluating the transit service performance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50, 47–61. Search in Google Scholar

12 Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, P., Singhal, S., & Sharma, P. (2014) Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 60-70. Search in Google Scholar

13 Lao, Y., Liu L. (2009) Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), 247–255. Search in Google Scholar

14 Mugion, R. G., Toni, M., Raharjo, H., Di Pietro, L., & Sebathu, S. P. (2018) Does the service quality of urban public transport enhance sustainable mobility? Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1566-1587. Search in Google Scholar

15 Nalmpantis D., Roukouni A., Genitsaris E., Stamelou A., Naniopoulos A. Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 11, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6 Search in Google Scholar

16 Nassereddine, M., Eskandari, H. (2017) An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 427–439. Search in Google Scholar

17 Nathanail, E. (2008) Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the hellenic railways. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 48–66. Search in Google Scholar

18 Özden, A., Şahin, S.N.A. (2020) Urban Mobility in Covid-19: How We Adapted to Change and How Should We Respond. Academic Platform Journal of Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, 1(2), 96–109. Search in Google Scholar

19 Parkes, S.D., Marsden, G., Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A.P. (2013) Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: evidence from Europe and North America. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 94–103. Search in Google Scholar

20 Şahin, S.N.A., Shibayama, T., Özden, A. (2022) Cultural Backgrounds Effects on Travel Mode Choice of International Communities in Vienna. Mobility. Knowledge and Innovation Hubs in Urban and Regional Development. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2022: 209218. Search in Google Scholar

21 Scott R.A., George B.T., Prybutok V.R. A Public Transportation Decision-Making Model within a Metropolitan Area: A Public Transportation Decision-Making Model within a Metropolitan Area. Decision Sciences. 2016, 47(6): 1048–1072. Search in Google Scholar

22 Sheth, C., Triantis, K., Teodorović, D. (2007) Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(4), 453–478. Search in Google Scholar

23 Tyrinopoulos, Y, Antoniou, C. (2008) Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy, 15(4), 260–272. Search in Google Scholar