[
Bernardez, E., 2013. On the cultural character of metaphor. Some reflections on Universality and Culture-specificity in the language and cognition of time, especially in Ameridian languages. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, M. P., 2000. Closet geographies: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cameron, L., 2007. Confrontation or complementarity?: Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 107-135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P. and Stanley, N., 2009. The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 63-89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chirrey, D. A., 2003. ‘I hereby come out’: What sort of speech act is coming out? Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 24-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chirrey, D. A., 2012. Reading the script: An analysis of script formulation in coming out advice texts. Journal of Language and Sexuality, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-58
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chirrey, D. A., 2020. Metaphors we come out by: How structural metaphors construct coming out in internet advice texts. Gender and Language, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 8-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo Fernández, E., 2015. Sex in language: Euphemistic and dysphemistic metaphors in internet forums. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A., 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dabrowska, E., 1997. Cognitive semantics and the Polish dative. Berlin: De Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Day, M. V. and Bobocel, D. R., 2013. The weight of a guilty conscience: Subjective body weight as an embodiment of guilt. PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, e69546.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deignan, A., 2005. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyrmo, T., 2022a. Gestural metaphorical scenarios and coming out narratives. Metaphor and the Social World, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyrmo, T., 2022b. A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 27-43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyrmo, T., 2022c. Do we need Queer Cognitive Linguistics? tekst i dyskurs – text und diskurs, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 241-257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fauconnier, G., 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, M. H., 2017. Multimodalities of metaphor: A perspective from the poetic arts. Poetics Today, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 61-92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Górska, E., 2020. Understanding abstract concepts across modes in multimodal discourse: A cognitive linguistic approach. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grady, J., 2005. Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1595-1614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M., 2017. Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovecses, Z., 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z., 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 321-347
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z., 2020. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lederer, J., 2019. Gesturing the source domain: The role of co-speech gesture in the metaphorical models of gender transition. Metaphor and the Social World, vol. 9, pp. 32-58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Littlemore, J., 2019. Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovelock, M., 2017. ‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 70-85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manning, J., 2014. Communicating sexual identities: A typology of coming out. Sexuality & Culture, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 122-138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Motschenbacher, H. and Stegu, M., 2013. Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 519-535.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, C., 2008. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Musolff, A., 2016. Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Musolff, A., 2021. National conceptualisations of the body politic. Cultural experience and political imagination. Singapore: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reddy, M., 1979: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language ab out language. In: A. Ortony, ed. Metaphor and thought. Berlin: De Gruyer, pp. 284-324.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ritchie, L. D. and Cameron, L., 2014. Open hearts or smoke and mirrors: Metaphorical framing and frame conflicts in a public meeting. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 204-223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryzhova, D., Rakhilina, E. V. and Kholkina, L., 2019. Chapter 10. Approaching perceptual qualities: The case of heavy. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque and A. Majid eds. Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185-207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seidman, S., 2002. Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharifian, F., 2017. Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slepian, M. L., Masicampo, E. J., Toosi, N. R. and Ambady, N., 2012. The physical burdens of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 619-624.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steen, G. 2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sweetser, E., 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szwedek, A., 2014. The nature of domains and the relationships between them in metaphorization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 342-374.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, N. and Huang, J., 2019. Primary metaphors across languages: Difficulty as weight and solidity. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 111-126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimman, L., 2009. Other kind of coming out’: Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender and Language, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53-80.
]Search in Google Scholar
