[
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E., 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, D. and Conrad, S., 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blum-Kulka, S., 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 11, pp. 131-146.10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C., 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chejnová, P., 2014. Expressing politeness in the institutional e-mail communications of university students in the Czech Republic. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 60, pp. 175-192.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coates, J., 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, P., 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042029095
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Downing, A. and Locke, P., 2006. English grammar: A university course. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203087640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dušková, L., Strnadová, Z., Knittlová, D., Peprník, J. and Tárnyiková, J., 2006. Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha: Academia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hassall, T., 1999. Request strategies in Indonesian. Pragmatics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 585-606.10.1075/prag.9.4.02has
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasselgren, A., 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 237-258.10.1111/j.1473-4192.1994.tb00065.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, Y., 2014. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G., 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huschová, P., 2014. Possibility readings of CAN and MAY and their potential interchangeability. Brno Studies in English, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 89-104.10.5817/BSE2014-1-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ježková, Š., ed., 2015. Corpus of Czech students’ spoken English. Pardubice: Univerzita Pardubice.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, G., 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, G., 2003. Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. In: R. Facchinetti, M. Krug and F. Palmer, eds. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 223-240.10.1515/9783110895339.223
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, G., 2004. Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, G., 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, G. and Larina, T., 2014. Politeness: West and East. Russian Journal of Linguistics, no. 4, pp. 9-34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, S. C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, M., 1986. The English verb: An exploration of structure and meaning. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez-Flor, A., 2003. An analysis of request production by university and secondary school EFL students. ES, vol. 25, pp. 167-182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez-Flor, A., 2005. A theoretical review of the speech act of suggesting: Towards a taxonomy for its use in FLT. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, vol. 18, pp. 167-187.10.14198/raei.2005.18.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthews, R., 2003. Modal auxiliary constructions, ΤΑΜ and interrogatives. In: R. Facchinetti, M. Krug and F. Palmer, eds. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.47-70.10.1515/9783110895339.47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ogiermann, E., 2009. Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189-219.10.1515/JPLR.2009.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, F., 1990. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papafragou, A., 1998. Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. discovery.ucl.ac.uk [Accessed 10 April 2020]. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1317914/1/299914.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papafragou, A., 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585474199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London/New York: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Recanati, F., 1987. Meaning and force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reiter, R. M., 2000. Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A contrastive study of requests and apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, J. R., 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, J. R., 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siemund, P., 2018. Speech acts and clause types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, G., 2014. Introducing functional grammar. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203785270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wierzbicka, A., 1985. Different languages, different cultures, different speech acts: English vs. Polish. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 9, pp. 145-178.10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yule, G., 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
