[
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18(2). 159–212. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450001346410.1017/S0047404500013464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Penelope, & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busse, Ulrich. 2003. The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address forms in the Shakespeare Corpus: Who says thou or you to whom? In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, John Benjamins. 193–221. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.10bus10.1075/pbns.107.10bus
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan & Dawn Archer. 2008. Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640–1760. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English, John Benjamins. 45–84. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.05cul10.1075/pbns.176.05cul
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan & Jane Demmen. 2011. Nineteenth-century English politeness: Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1–2). 49–81. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honegger, Thomas. 2003. “And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thane preye I thee, […].”: Forms of address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, John Benjamins. 61–84. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.05hon10.1075/pbns.107.05hon
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hope, Jonathan. 2003. Shakespeare’s grammar. Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474243391
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008a. Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English, John Benjamins. 27–44. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008b. Linguistic politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A study of Old English address terms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9(1). 140–158. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kopytko, Roman. 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English, John Benjamins. 515–540. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.35.27kop10.1075/pbns.35.27kop
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, Robin T. 2005. Civility and its discontents: Or, getting in your face. In Robin T. Lakoff –& Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness. John Benjamins. 23–43. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.139.05lak10.1075/pbns.139.05lak
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nevala, Minna. 2003. Family first: Address and subscription formulae in English family correspondence from the fifteenth to the seventeenth century. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, John Benjamins. 147–176. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.08nev10.1075/pbns.107.08nev
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English, John Benjamins. 541-601. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.35.28nev10.1075/pbns.35.28nev
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shvanyukova, Polina. 2019. Promoting negative politeness in nineteenth-century England: The case of letter-writing manuals. In Annick Paternoster & Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.), Politeness in nineteenth-century Europe, John Benjamins. 171–196. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.299.06shv10.1075/pbns.299.06shv
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. Anglo scripts against “putting pressure” on other people and their linguistic manifestations. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context, De Gruyter Mouton. 31–64. DOI: 10.1515/9783110911114.3110.1515/9783110911114.31
]Search in Google Scholar
