<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Definitions in learners’ dictionaries are usually written within a limited defining vocabulary (DV), that is, a set of lexical units specified prior to defining. Some researchers claim that this approach to vocabulary control may lead to definitions being syntactically complex, convoluted, and wordy. This paper aims to examine whether the introduction of a limited DV in <italic>OALD5</italic> made its definitions more difficult to read for learners as compared to the definitions in <italic>OALD4</italic>, which were written with no explicit restrictions on the definition vocabulary. The study examines a selection of construction patterns that are potentially difficult for less advanced learners, using quantitative and qualitative methods. The examination shows that the introduction of the limited DV had no effect on most parameters studied. However, it led to significant increases in the length of definitions and the number of nominal constructions with a postmodifying past participle (e.g., <italic>performance given</italic>, <italic>spice ground, phrase used</italic>).</p>
</abstract>

Definitions in learners’ dictionaries are usually written within a limited defining vocabulary (DV), that is, a set of lexical units specified prior to defining. Some researchers claim that this approach to vocabulary control may lead to definitions being syntactically complex, convoluted, and wordy. This paper aims to examine whether the introduction of a limited DV in OALD5 made its definitions more difficult to read for learners as compared to the definitions in OALD4, which were written with no explicit restrictions on the definition vocabulary. The study examines a selection of construction patterns that are potentially difficult for less advanced learners, using quantitative and qualitative methods. The examination shows that the introduction of the limited DV had no effect on most parameters studied. However, it led to significant increases in the length of definitions and the number of nominal constructions with a postmodifying past participle (e.g., performance given, spice ground, phrase used).

Does a Limited Defining Vocabulary Make Definitions Syntactically More Complex?

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"Does a Limited Defining Vocabulary Make Definitions Syntactically More Complex?"}

Definitions in learners’ dictionaries are usually written within a limited defining vocabulary (DV), that is, a set of lexical units specified prior to...

Does a Limited Defining Vocabulary Make Definitions Syntactically More Complex?

Online veröffentlicht: 13. März 2021

Seitenbereich: 5 - 19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2020-0001

Schlüsselwörter
Defining vocabulary, DV, limited defining vocabulary, vocabulary control, construction pattern

© 2020 Mariusz Piotr Kamiński, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Does a Limited Defining Vocabulary Make Definitions Syntactically More Complex?

Online veröffentlicht: 13. März 2021

Seitenbereich: 5 - 19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2020-0001

SchlüsselwörterDefining vocabulary, DV, limited defining vocabulary, vocabulary control, construction pattern

© 2020 Mariusz Piotr Kamiński, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
Defining vocabulary, DV, limited defining vocabulary, vocabulary control, construction pattern