<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>An interdisciplinary approach was used to analyse multicomplex issues of the Covid-19 crisis, demonstrated also by the Economics of innovation. The Economics of innovation is useful when analysing a unique feedback of megatrends and the emergence of liminal crisis innovations. The purpose of this paper is, in spite of many statements to the contrary, to prove that innovative activity may serve as the key to unlocking a post-crisis economic development. Analyses presented in the paper are based on the Polish and foreign literature on the subject, reports on research conducted in many research centres and the author’s own observation at the Social Innovation Council. Three research themes are signalled: 1) the reality of the crisis in the aspect of Covid-19 pandemic and other crises in the literature studies and in practice; 2) innovation as the driving force for recovering from the Covid-19 crisis; 3) Coronavirus support: the activity of the state and social expectations. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this paper are, to a large extent, based on hermeneutics; they also stem from statistical data analyses and own research.</p>
</abstract>

An interdisciplinary approach was used to analyse multicomplex issues of the Covid-19 crisis, demonstrated also by the Economics of innovation. The Economics of innovation is useful when analysing a unique feedback of megatrends and the emergence of liminal crisis innovations. The purpose of this paper is, in spite of many statements to the contrary, to prove that innovative activity may serve as the key to unlocking a post-crisis economic development. Analyses presented in the paper are based on the Polish and foreign literature on the subject, reports on research conducted in many research centres and the author’s own observation at the Social Innovation Council. Three research themes are signalled: 1) the reality of the crisis in the aspect of Covid-19 pandemic and other crises in the literature studies and in practice; 2) innovation as the driving force for recovering from the Covid-19 crisis; 3) Coronavirus support: the activity of the state and social expectations. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this paper are, to a large extent, based on hermeneutics; they also stem from statistical data analyses and own research.

Crisis and Innovations: Are they Constructive or Destructive?

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"Crisis and Innovations: Are they Constructive or Destructive?"}

An interdisciplinary approach was used to analyse multicomplex issues of the Covid-19 crisis, demonstrated also by the Economics of innovation. The Economics...

Crisis and Innovations: Are they Constructive or Destructive?

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 425 - 449

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2021-0024

Schlüsselwörter
crisis, Covid-19, liminal innovations, Coronavirus support

© 2021 Ewa Okoń-Horodyńska, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crisis and Innovations: Are they Constructive or Destructive?

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 425 - 449

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2021-0024

Schlüsselwörtercrisis, Covid-19, liminal innovations, Coronavirus support

© 2021 Ewa Okoń-Horodyńska, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
crisis, Covid-19, liminal innovations, Coronavirus support