[
Adam, Edmund. 2023. Reviving the Sociology of Organizations in Higher Education: The Case of How Global University Rankings Influence the Strategic Management of Canadian Universities. International Review of Sociology. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2156436.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Altrichter, Herbert. 2015. Governance in Education: Conceptualisation, Methodology, and Research Strategies for Analysing Contemporary Transformations of Teacher Education. Pp. 9–30 in Governance in Initial Teacher Education: Perspectives on England and Germany, edited by Dina Kuhlee, Jürgen van Buer, and Christopher Winch. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andsager, Julie L., and H. Allen White. 2007. Self Versus Other: Media, Messages, and the Third-Person Effect. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Atakan-Duman, Sirin, Aysin Pasamehmetoglu, and Tuba Bozaykut-Buk. 2019. The Challenge of Constructing a Unique Online Identity through an Isomorphic Social Media Presence. International Journal of Communication 13: 160–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumann, Sheron. 2022. Research Profile Clusters among Lecturers in Non-Traditional Higher Education. An Exploratory Analysis in the Swiss Context. International Journal of Educational Research Open 3: 100182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BfS (Bundesamt für Statistik). 2020. Tabellen. Hochschulpersonal (SHIS-PERS), Hochschulfinanzen (SHIS-FIN) und Studierende und Abschlüsse der Hochschulen (SHIS-studex) 2019. Neuchâtel: BfS, https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kataloge-datenbanken/tabellen.html?dyn_prodima=900782 (12.11.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bloch, Roland. 2021. The Actorhood Imperative. On Universities as Organisational Actors. European Journal of Higher Education 11(S1): 489–505.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blümel, Albrecht. 2016. Hochschulleitung und Hochschulmanagement. Pp. 517–532 in Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik, edited by Dagmar Simon, Andreas Knie, Stefan Hornbostel, and Karin Zimmermann. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borchelt, Rick E., and Kristian H. Nielsen. 2014. Public Relations in Science: Managing the Trust Portfolio. Pp. 58–69 in Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, Dietmar. 1999. Changing Governance Models in Higher Education: The Case of the New Managerialism. Swiss Political Science Review 5(3): 1–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bühler, Heike, Gabriele Naderer, Robertine Koch, and Carmen Schuster. 2007. Hochschul-PR in Deutsch-land. Ziele, Strategien und Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: DUV.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, Burton R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’heer, Evelien. 2018. Media Logic Revisited: The Concept of Social Media Logic as Alternative Framework to Study Politicians’ Usage of Social Media During Election Times. Pp. 173–194 in Media Logic(s) Revisited: Modelling the Interplay between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change, edited by Caja Thimm, Mario Anastasiadis, and Jessica Einspänner-Pflock. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis III, Charles H. F., Regina Deil-Amen, Cecilia Rios-Aguilar, and Manuel Sacramento González Canché. 2015. Social Media, Higher Education, and Community Colleges: A Research Synthesis and Implications for the Study of Two-Year Institutions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 39(5): 409–422.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davison, Phillips W. 1983. The Third-Person Effect in Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47(1): 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Boer, Harry, Jürgen Enders, and Uwe Schimank. 2007. On the Way Towards New Public Management? The Governance of University Systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. Pp. 137–152 in New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration, edited by Dorothea Jansen. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Jong, Stefan P. L., and Corina Balaban. 2022. How Universities Influence Societal Impact Practices: Academics’ Sense-Making of Organizational Impact Strategies. Science and Public Policy 49(4): 609–620.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Donges, Patrick. 2008. Medialisierung politischer Organisationen. Parteien in der Mediengesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elken, Mari, Bjørn Stensaker, and Indra Dedze. 2018. The Painters Behind the Profile: The Rise and Functioning of Communication Departments in Universities. Higher Education 76(6): 1109–1122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engwall, Lars. 2008. Minerva and the Media: Universities Protecting and Promoting Themselves. Pp. 31–48 in European Universities in Transition: Issues, Models and Cases, edited by Carmelo Mazza, Paolo Quattrone, and Angelo Riccaboni. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entradas, Marta, Martin W. Bauer, Colm O’Muircheartaigh, Frank Marcinkowski, Asako Okamura, Giuseppe Pellegrini, John Besley, Luisa Massarani, Pedro Russo, Anthony Dudo, Barbara Saracino, Carla Silva, Kei Kano, Luis Amorim, Massimiano Bucchi, Ahmet Suerdem, Tatsuo Oyama, and Yuh-Yuh Li. 2020. Public Communication by Research Institutes Compared across Countries and Sciences: Building Capacity for Engagement or Competing for Visibility? PLoS One 15(7): e0235191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esser, Frank, and Jesper Strömbäck (eds.). 2014. Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fähnrich, Birte, Jens Vogelgesang, and Michael Scharkow. 2020. Evaluating Universities’ Strategic Online Communication: How Do Shanghai Ranking’s Top 50 Universities Grow Stakeholder Engagement with Facebook Posts? Journal of Communication Management 24(3): 265–283.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferris, Sharmila Pixy, and Kathleen Waldron. 2021. Higher Education Leadership: Pathways and Insights. Bingley: Emerald.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freed, Gwendolyn H. 2018. Managing External Relations, Higher Education Institutions. Pp. 1–7 in Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, edited by Jung-Cheol Shin and Pedro Nuno Teixeira. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_525-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedrichsmeier, Andres, and Silke Fürst. 2012. Neue Governance als Wettbewerb um Sichtbarkeit. Zur veränderten Dynamik der Öffentlichkeits- und Medienorientierung von Hochschulen. Die Hochschule: Journal für Wissenschaft und Bildung 21(2): 46–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fumasoli, Tatiana, and Benedetto Lepori. 2011. Patterns of Strategies in Swiss Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education 61(2): 157–178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fürst, Silke, Daniel Vogler, Mike S. Schäfer, and Isabel Sörensen. 2021. Media Representations of Academia: Mapping and Typologizing News Coverage of All Swiss Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Communication 15: 3600–3620.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fürst, Silke, Sophia Charlotte Volk, Mike S. Schäfer, Daniel Vogler, and Isabel Sörensen. 2022a. Assessing Changes in the Public Communication of Higher Education Institutions: A Survey of Leaders of Swiss Universities and Colleges. Studies in Communication Sciences (SComS) 22(3): 515–534.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fürst, Silke, Sophia Charlotte Volk, Mike S. Schäfer, Daniel Vogler, and Isabel Sörensen. 2022b. Organizational and Societal Goals in Tension? A Survey of Communication Practitioners at Swiss Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Science Communication 21(7): A06.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasse, Raimund, and Georg Krücken. 2013. Competition and Actorhood: A Further Expansion of the Neo-Institutional Agenda. Sociologia Internationalis 51(2): 181–205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hooker, Catherine M., and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2017. Survey Methods, Online. Pp. 1–7 in The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by Jörg Matthes, Christine S. Davis, and Robert F. Potter. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0244.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplow, Mirjam. 2019. Kommunikation für die Wissenschaft. Die Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit in wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen hat sich enorm verändert. Pp. 183–191 in Wissenschafts-Journalismus. Ein Handbuch für Ausbildung und Praxis, edited by Winfried Göpfert. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiener, Urs. 2013. Die Fachhochschule als Missverständnis. Reform, Identität, Selbstbeschreibung. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39(2): 341–360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klinger, Ulrike, and Jacob Svensson. 2015. The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach. New Media & Society 17(8): 1241–1257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koivumäki, Kaisu, and Clare Wilkinson. 2022. “One Might Tweet Just for Money”: Organisational and Institutional Incentives for Researchers’ Social Media Communication and Public Engagement Practices. Studies in Communication Sciences (SComS) 22(3): 471–491.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koivumäki, Kaisu, Timo Koivumäki, and Erkki Karvonen. 2021. Challenges in the Collaboration Between Researchers and In-House Communication Professionals in the Digital Media Landscape. Journal of Science Communication 20(3): 1–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
König, Mareike. 2020. Scholarly Communication in Social Media. Pp. 639–656 in Science Communication, edited by Annette Leßmöllmann, Marcelo Dascal and Thomas Gloning. Boston: de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krücken, Georg. 2014. Higher Education Reforms and Unintended Consequences: A Research Agenda. Studies in Higher Education 39(8): 1439–1450.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krücken, Georg. 2021. Multiple Competitions in Higher Education: A Conceptual Approach. Innovation 23(2): 163–181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krücken, Georg, and Frank Meier. 2006. Turning the University into an Organizational Actor. Pp. 241–257 in Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, edited by Gili Drori, John Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kühl, Stefan. 2020. Organisationen. Eine sehr kurze Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lafuente-Ruiz-de-Sabando, Amaia, Pilar Zorrilla, and Javier Forcada. 2018. A Review of Higher Education Image and Reputation Literature: Knowledge Gaps and a Research Agenda. European Research on Management and Business Economics 24(1): 8–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leder, Christian. 2022. Der lange Weg von der «Hochschule Schweiz» zum «Hochschulraum». Analysen zur politischen Geschichte und Organisation des Hochschulsystems. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Zurich, Switzerland, https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/224274/1/Leder_Christian_Dissertation.pdf (21.06.2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepori, Benedetto. 2008. Research in Non-University Higher Education Institutions: The Case of the Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences. Higher Education 56(1): 45–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepori, Benedetto, Jeroen Huisman, and Marco Seeber. 2014. Convergence and Differentiation Processes in Swiss Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis. Studies in Higher Education 39(2): 197–218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leutwyler, Bruno, Nikolay Popov, and Charl Wolhuter. 2017. The Internationalization of Teacher Education: Different Contexts, Similar Challenges. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Bulgarian Comparative Education Society (BCES). Borovets, Bulgaria, June, 2017, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574195 (13.06.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linvill, Darren L., Sara E. McGee, and Laura K. Hicks. 2012. Colleges’ and Universities’ Use of Twitter: A Content Analysis. Public Relations Review 38(4): 636–638.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lo, Yin-Yueh, Chun-Ju Huang, and Hans Peter Peters. 2019. Do Organizational Interests Interfere with Public Communication of Science? An Explorative Study of Public Relations of Scientific Organizations in Taiwan. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 13(4): 557–574.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lueg, Klarissa, and Angela Graf. 2022. The Organization of Higher Education: An Overview of Sociological Research into Universities as Organizations. Pp. 13–29 in Research Handbook on the Sociology of Organizations, edited by Mary Godwyn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lund, Brady. 2019. Universities Engaging Social Media Users: An Investigation of Quantitative Relationships between Universities’ Facebook Followers/Interactions and University Attributes. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 29(2): 251–267.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcinkowski, Frank, Matthias Kohring, Andres Friedrichsmeier, and Silke Fürst. 2013. Neue Governance und die Öffentlichkeit der Hochschulen. Pp. 257–288 in Neue Governance der Wissenschaft: Reorganisation – externe Anforderungen – Medialisierung, edited by Edgar Grande, Dorothea Jansen, Otfried Jarren, Arie Rip, Uwe Schimank, and Peter Weingart. Bielefeld: Transcript.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcinkowski, Frank, Matthias Kohring, Silke Fürst, and Andres Friedrichsmeier. 2014. Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public: An Empirical Investigation. Science Communication 36(1): 56–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mau, Steffen. 2019. The Metric Society: On the Quantification of the Social. Cambridge: Polity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McAllister, Sheila M. 2012. How the World’s Top Universities Provide Dialogic Forums for Marginalized Voices. Public Relations Review 38(2): 319–327.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meier, Frank. 2019. Trends der Hochschulentwicklung. Der Weg zur wettbewerblichen Organisation. Pp. 25–38 in Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation, edited by Birte Fähnrich, Julia Metag, Senja Post, and Mike S. Schäfer. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metag, Julia, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2017. Hochschulen zwischen Social Media-Spezialisten und Online- Verweigerern. Eine Analyse der Online- und Social Media-Kommunikation. Studies in Communication and Media (SCM) 6(2): 160–195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metag, Julia, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2019. Hochschulkommunikation in Online-Medien und Social Media. Pp. 363–391 in Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation, edited by Birte Fähnrich, Julia Metag, Senja Post, and Mike S. Schäfer. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morphew, Christopher C., Tatiana Fumasoli, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2018. Changing Missions? How the Strategic Plans of Research-Intensive Universities in Northern Europe and North America Balance Competing Identities. Studies in Higher Education 43(6): 1074–1088.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pallas, Josef, Magnus Fredriksson, and Linda Wedlin. 2016. Translating Institutional Logics: When the Media Logic Meets Professions. Organization Studies 37(11): 1661–1684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, Hans Peter, Harald Heinrichs, Arlena Jung, Monika Kallfass, and Imme Petersen. 2008. Medialization of Science as a Prerequisite of Its Legitimization and Political Relevance. Pp. 71–92 in Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, edited by Donghong Cheng, Michel Claessens, Toss Gascoigne, Jenni Metcalfe, Bernard Schiele, and Shi Shunke. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raupp, Juliana. 2009. Medialisierung als Parameter einer PR-Theorie. Pp. 265–284 in Theorien der Public Relations. Grundlagen und Perspektiven der PR-Forschung, edited by Ulrike Röttger. Wies-baden: VS Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raupp, Juliana, and Angela Osterheider. 2019. Evaluation von Hochschulkommunikation. Pp. 181–205 in Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation, edited by Birte Fähnrich, Julia Metag, Senja Post, and Mike S. Schäfer. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheu, Andreas. 2019. Between Offensive and Defensive Mediatization: An Exploration of Mediatization Strategies of German Science-Policy Stakeholders. Journal of Science Communication 18(3): 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheu, Andreas, and Arko Olesk. 2018. National Contextual Influences on Mediatization: The Comparison of Science Decision Makers in Estonia and Germany. Science Communication 40(3): 366–392.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schimank, Uwe. 2002. Organisationen: Akteurkonstellationen – Korporative Akteure – Sozialsysteme. Pp. 29–54 Organisationssoziologie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 42, edited by Jutta Allmendinger and Thomas Hinz. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwetje, Thorsten, Christiane Hauser, Stefan Böschen, and Annette Leßmöllmann. 2020. Communicating Science in Higher Education and Research Institutions: An Organization Communication Perspective on Science Communication. Journal of Communication Management 24(3): 189–205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, Richard W. 2015. Organizational Theory and Higher Education. Journal of Organizational Theory in Education 1(1): 68–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sörensen, Isabel, Silke Fürst, Daniel Vogler, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2023. Higher Education Institutions on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter: Comparing Swiss Universities’ Social Media Communication. Media and Communication 11(1): 264–277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. 2021. Science in the Swiss Public: The State of Science Communication and Public Engagement with Science in Switzerland. Bern: Swiss Academies Reports, http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4974312 (16.07.2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thiele, Franziska, and Corinna Luethje. 2021. Post or Perish? – Scholarly Communication Practices on Social Media in Times of Deep Mediatization. Mediatizations Studies 5: 59–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tratschin, Luca. 2021. Post-NPM-Governance und Grenzobjekte. Zur organisationalen Funktion des Digitalisierungsdiskurses an Universitäten. Soziale Systeme 26(1–2): 285–312.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Truniger, Luzia. 2017. Schlaglichter auf Entwicklungen und Differenzierungsprozesse in Hochschulen. Pp. 15–29 in Führen in Hochschulen. Anregungen und Reflexionen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, edited by Luzia Truniger. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. 2013. Understanding Social Media Logic. Media and Communication 1(1): 2–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VanDyke, Matthew S., and Nicole M. Lee. 2020. Science Public Relations: The Parallel, Interwoven, and Contrasting Trajectories of Public Relations and Science Communication Theory and Practice. Public Relations Review 46(4): 1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vogler, Daniel. 2020a. Analyzing Reputation of Swiss Universities on Twitter–The Role of Stakeholders, Content and Sources. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 25(3): 429–445.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vogler, Daniel. 2020b. The Effects of Media Reputation on Third-Party Funding of Swiss Universities. Journal of Communication Management 24(3): 285–298.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vogler, Daniel, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2020. Growing Influence of University PR on Science News Coverage? A Longitudinal Automated Content Analysis of University Media Releases and Newspaper Coverage in Switzerland, 2003‒2017. International Journal of Communication 14: 3143–3164.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weingart, Peter. 2012. The Lure of the Mass Media and Its Repercussions on Science. Pp. 17–32 in The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and Its Repercussions, edited by Simone Rödder, Martina Franzen, and Peter Weingart. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yeo, Sara K., and Dominique Brossard. 2017. The (Changing) Nature of Scientist–Media Interactions: A Cross-National Analysis. Pp. 261–272 in The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, edited by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan Kahan, and Dietram A. Scheufele. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
