[Achiume, E. Tendayi. 2014. Beyond Prejudice: Structural Xenophobic Discrimination Against Refugees. Georgetown Journal of International Law 45(2): 323–382.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arango, Luis, Dolores Mata, and Nataly Obando. 2015. Echoes of the Crises in Spain and US in the Colombian Labor Market: A Differences-in-Differences Approach. SERIEs 6(4): 441–477.10.1007/s13209-015-0130-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Arendt, Florient and Narin Karadas. 2019. Ethnic Concordance in Patient–Physician Communication: Experimental Evidence from Germany. Journal of Health Communication 24(1): 1–8.10.1080/10810730.2018.1549624]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayón, Cecilia. 2015. Economic, Social and Health Effects of Discrimination on Latino Immigrant Families. Migration Policy Institute: Washing DC. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/economic-social-and-health-effects-discriminationlatino-immigrant-families.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bargain, Olivier, Herwig Immervoll, and Heikki Viitamäki. 2012. No Claim, No Pain. Measuring the Non-Take-Up of Social Assistance Using Register Data. The Journal of Economic Inequality 10(3): 375–395.10.1007/s10888-010-9158-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Blix, Marten. 2018. Digitalization, Immigration and the Welfare State New Thinking in Political Economy Series Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Sweden Publication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourgois, Philippe and Jeff Schonberg. 2009. Righteous Dopefiend. University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brodkin, Evelyn. and Malay Majmundar. 2010. Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 827–848.10.1093/jopart/mup046]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruckmeier, Kerstin and Jürgen Wiemers. 2017. Differences in Welfare Take-Up Between Immigrants and Natives – a Microsimulation Study. International Journal of Manpower 38(2): 226–241.10.1108/IJM-03-2015-0053]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrne, Bridget, Claire Alexander, Omar Khan, James Nazro, and William Shankley (eds.). 2020. Ethnicity and Race in the UK: State of the Nation. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Bristol University Press10.2307/j.ctv14t47tm]Search in Google Scholar
[Calderon, Jose. 1992. Hispanic and Latino: The Viability of Categories for Panethnic Unity. Latin American Perspectives 19(4): 37–44.10.1177/0094582X9201900404]Search in Google Scholar
[Crepaz, Markus and Regan Damron. 2009. Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes About Immigrants. Comparative Political Studies 42(3): 437–463.10.1177/0010414008325576]Search in Google Scholar
[Currie, Janet. 2004. The Take Up of Social Benefits. National Bureau of Economic Research. pp. 80–148 in Auerbach, Alan, David Card, and John Quigley (eds), Public policy and the income distribution, New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dragos, Radu, Maria Hudson and Joan Phillips. 2010. Migrant Workers’ Interactions with Welfare Benefits: A Review of Recent Evidence and its Relevance for the Tax Credits System. HMRC Research Report 115.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2012. Comparing Welfare State Regimes: Are Typologies an Ideal or Realistic Strategy? European Social Policy Analysis Network. ESPAnet Conference.]Search in Google Scholar
[Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N. J: Princeton University Press.10.1177/095892879100100108]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurofund. 2015. Access to Social Benefits: Reducing Non-Take-Up. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1536en.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, Tony. 2016. Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315602325]Search in Google Scholar
[Finn, Daniel and Jo Goodship. 2014. Take-Up of Benefits and Poverty: An Evidence and Policy Review. Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion. London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, Carly. 2008. The Welfare Queen: Race, Gender, Class, and Public Opinion. Race, Gender & Class 15(3/4): 162–179.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, Michael, Katrin Gasior, Tamara Premrov, Katarina Hollan, and Anette Scoppetta. 2020. Falling through the Social Safety Net? Analysing Non-Take-up of Minimum Income Benefit and Monetary Social Assistance in Austria. Social Policy & Administration 54: 827–843.10.1111/spol.12581]Search in Google Scholar
[Flores, René. 2015. The Resurgence of Race in Spain: Perceptions of Discrimination Among Immigrants. Social Forces 94(1): 237–269.10.1093/sf/sov056]Search in Google Scholar
[Glick Schiller, Nina, Ayşe Çağlar, and Thaddeus C. Guldbrandsen. 2006. Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation. American Ethnologist 33(4): 612–633.10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.612]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman, Ashley, Kim Fleming, Nicole Markwick, Louise Lagimodiere, and Thomas Kerr. 2017. “They Treated Me Like Crap And I Know It Was Because I Was Native”: The Healthcare Experiences of Aboriginal Peoples Living in Vancouver’s Inner City. Social Science and Medicine 17: 87–94.10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.053]Search in Google Scholar
[Grosios, Konstantina, Peter Gahan, and Jane Burbidge. 2010. Overview of Healthcare in the UK. The EPMA journal 1(4): 529–534.10.1007/s13167-010-0050-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hainmueller, Jens and Daniel Hopkins. 2014. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17(1): 225–249.10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818]Search in Google Scholar
[Harris, Jennifer. 2020. The Digitization of Advice and Welfare Benefits Services: Re-Imagining the Homeless User. Housing Studies 35(1): 143–162.10.1080/02673037.2019.1594709]Search in Google Scholar
[Hooijer, Gerda and Georg Picot. 2015. European Welfare States and Migrant Poverty: The Institutional Determinants of Disadvantage. Comparative Political Studies 48(14): 1879–1904.10.1177/0010414015597508]Search in Google Scholar
[Isakjee, Arshad. 2017. Welfare State Regimes: A Literature Review’, IRiS Working Paper Series, 18/2017 (UPWEB Working Paper Series, No. 5/2017) Birmingham: Institute for Research into Super-diversity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jessen, Jorunn and Per A. Tufte. 2014. Discretionary Decision-Making in a Changing Context of Activation Policies and Welfare Reforms. Journal of Social Policy 43(2): 269–288.10.1017/S0047279413000998]Search in Google Scholar
[Jo, Yongmie. 2013. Psycho-Social Dimensions of Poverty: When Poverty Becomes Shameful. Critical Social Policy 33: 514–531.10.1177/0261018313479008]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, Kevin. 2009. The Intersection of Race and Class in U.S. Immigration Law and Enforcement. Law and Contemporary Problems 72(4): 1–35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayser, Hilke and Joachim Frick. 2000. Take It or Leave It:(Non-)Take-Up Behavior of Social Assistance in Germany. Discussion Paper No. 210. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW).]Search in Google Scholar
[Leruth, Benjamin and Peter Taylor-Gooby. 2019. Does Political Discourse Matter? Comparing Party Positions and Public Attitudes on Immigration in England. Politics 39(2): 154–169.10.1177/0263395718755566]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy; Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.10.2307/1288305]Search in Google Scholar
[Lo, Ming-Cheng and Roxana Bahar. 2013. Resisting the Colonization of the Lifeworld? Immigrant Patients’ Experiences with Co-ethnic Healthcare Workers. Social Science & Medicine 87: 68–76.10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Lott, Bernice and Heather Bullock. 2007. Psychology and Economic Injustice: Personal, Professional, and Political Intersections. American Psychological Association. The book is 190 pages10.1037/11501-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Mallet, Marie and Johanna Pinto-Coelho. 2018. Investigating Intra-Ethnic Divisions Among Latino Immigrants in Miami, Florida. Latino Studies 16: 91–112.10.1057/s41276-017-0108-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Mar-Molinero, Clare 2002. The Politics of Language in the Spanish-Speaking World: From Colonization to Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203443729]Search in Google Scholar
[Mazet, Pierre. 2014. Analysis of the Non-Take-Up of Benefits: A Public Policy Assessment Tool. Service de lutte contre la pauvreté, la précarité et l’exclusion sociale, Bruxelles, Belgium.]Search in Google Scholar
[McIlwaine, Cathy. 2015 Legal Latins: Creating Webs and Practices of Immigration Status among Latin American Migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(3): 493–511.10.1080/1369183X.2014.931803]Search in Google Scholar
[McLaren, Lauren. 2015. Immigration and Perceptions of National Political Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739463.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Morales, Laura and Alfonso Echazarra. 2013. Will We All Hunker Down? The Impact of Immigration and Diversity on Local Communities in Spain. Journal of Elections. Public Opinion & Parties 23(3): 343–366.10.1080/17457289.2013.808642]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreno Fuentes, Francisco and Maria Bruquetas Callejo. 2011. Immigration and the Welfare State in Spain. Barcelona: Coleccion Estudios Sociales. LaCaixa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petropoulos, Georgias, Scott Marcus, Nicolas Moës, and Enrico Bergamini. 2019. Digitalization and European Welfare States. Bruegel Blueprint Series 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, Lakeisha. 2006. Illegal Immigrants Should Not Receive Social Services. International Social Science Review 81(1/2): 66–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reijnders, Mark, Jelmer Schalk, and Trui Steen. 2018. Services Wanted? Understanding the Non-Take-Up of Social Support at the Local Level. VOLUNTAS 29(6): 1360–1374.10.1007/s11266-018-00060-w]Search in Google Scholar
[Reitz, Jeffrey G., Patrick Simon, and Emily Laxer. 2017. Muslims’ Social Inclusion and Exclusion in France, Québec, and Canada: Does National Context Matter? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(15): 2473–2498.]Search in Google Scholar
[Riphahn, Regina, Monika Sander, and Christoph Wunder. 2013. The Welfare Use of Immigrants and Natives in Germany: The Case of Turkish Immigrants. International Journal of Manpower 34(1): 70–82.10.1108/01437721311319665]Search in Google Scholar
[Römer, Friederike. 2017. Generous to All or ‘Insiders Only’? The Relationship between Welfare State Generosity and Immigrant Welfare Rights. Journal of European Social Policy 27(2): 173–196.10.1177/0958928717696441]Search in Google Scholar
[Sainsbury, Diane. 2006. Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms in Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 229–244.10.1177/0958928706065594]Search in Google Scholar
[Sainsbury, Diane. 2012. Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654772.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth, and Clara Holzinger. 2018. ‘Damn It, I Am a Miserable Eastern European in the Eyes of the Administrator’: EU Migrants’ Experiences with (Transnational) Social Security. Social Inclusion 6(3): 201–209.10.17645/si.v6i3.1477]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi, Leiyu, Gregory Stevens, Lydie Lebrun, Pegah Faed, and Jenna Tsai. 2008. Enhancing the Measurement of Health Disparities for Vulnerable Populations. Journal of public health management and practice 14: 45–52.10.1097/01.PHH.0000338386.59565.dc]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Laura. 2010. Multicultural Foundations of Psychology and Counseling Series. Psychology, Poverty, and the Rnd of Social Exclusion: Putting our Practice to Work. New York: Teachers College Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[United Nations. 2017. International Migration Report 9. New York: United Nations.]Search in Google Scholar
[U. S. Census Bureau. 2015. Population Estimates, https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2015/(27.06.2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[USCIS. 2018. Final Rule on Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility. www.uscis.gov/archive/archive-news/final-rule-public-charge-ground-inadmissibility (27.06.2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim. 1991. Non-Take-Up of Social Security Benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 1(1): 15–30.10.1177/095892879100100103]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim. 1995. Realizing Rights: A Multi-Level Approach to Non-take-up of Means-tested Benefits. Aldershot: Avebury.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Oorschot, Wim. 1996. Modelling Non-Take-Up: The Interactive Model of Multi-Level Influences and the Dynamic Model of Benefit Receipt. In New Perspectives on the Non-take-up of Social Security Benefits, edited by Wim van Oorschot. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warin, Philippe. 2008. Le non-recours par désintérêt : la possibilité d’un « vivre hors droits ». Vie sociale 1(1): 9–19.10.3917/vsoc.081.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Warin, Philippe. 2014. What Is the Non-Take-Up of Social Benefits. Books and Ideas 9: 1–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinberg, Merlinda. 2010. The Social Construction of Social Work Ethics: Politicizing and Broadening the Lens. Journal of Progressive Human Services 21(1): 32–44.10.1080/10428231003781774]Search in Google Scholar
[Yemane, Ruta and Mariña Fernández-Reino. 2019. Latinos in the United States and in Spain: the Impact of Ethnic Group Stereotypes on Labour Market Outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47(6): 1240–1260. Doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1622806.10.1080/1369183X.2019.1622806]Search in Google Scholar
