Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Predicting Equations and Resting Energy Expenditure Changes in Overweight Adults

Mojca Stubelj

Mojca Stubelj

University of Primorska, Faculty of Health SciencesSlovenia
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stubelj, Mojca
, 
Kaja Teraž

Kaja Teraž

Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology ResearchKoper, Slovenia
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Teraž, Kaja
 und 
Tamara Poklar Vatovec

Tamara Poklar Vatovec

University of Primorska, Faculty of Health SciencesSlovenia
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Poklar Vatovec, Tamara
  
13. Dez. 2019
Predicting Equations and Resting Energy Expenditure Changes in Overweight Adults's Cover Image
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN
Artikel-Kategorie: Original scientific article
Online veröffentlicht: 13. Dez. 2019
Seitenbereich: 33 - 41
Eingereicht: 02. Mai 2019
Akzeptiert: 05. Nov. 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0005
Schlüsselwörter
© 2020 Mojca Stubelj et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Comparison of different methods for determining female subjects’ REE before and after the 6-month intervention.Legend: REE, measured resting energy expenditure; HB, Harris–Benedict’s method; MSJ, Mifflin–St Jeor’s method; O, Owen’s method; W, Wright’s method.* The difference before and after the intervention was statistically significant in females at the level of p<0.05.
Comparison of different methods for determining female subjects’ REE before and after the 6-month intervention.Legend: REE, measured resting energy expenditure; HB, Harris–Benedict’s method; MSJ, Mifflin–St Jeor’s method; O, Owen’s method; W, Wright’s method.* The difference before and after the intervention was statistically significant in females at the level of p<0.05.

Figure 2

Comparison of different methods for determining male subjects’ REE before and after the 6-month intervention.Legend: REE, measured resting energy expenditure; HB, Harris–Benedict’s method; MSJ, Mifflin–St Jeor’s method; O, Owen’s method; W, Wright’s method.* The difference before and after the intervention was statistically significant in males at the level of p<0.05.
Comparison of different methods for determining male subjects’ REE before and after the 6-month intervention.Legend: REE, measured resting energy expenditure; HB, Harris–Benedict’s method; MSJ, Mifflin–St Jeor’s method; O, Owen’s method; W, Wright’s method.* The difference before and after the intervention was statistically significant in males at the level of p<0.05.

Figure 3

Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between predicted REE with Owen (O) equation and measured REE for female.
Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between predicted REE with Owen (O) equation and measured REE for female.

Figure 4

Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between predicted REE with Mifflin–St Jeor (MSJ) equation and measured REE for male.
Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between predicted REE with Mifflin–St Jeor (MSJ) equation and measured REE for male.

Comparison of measured REE and estimated REE in females_

Measured REE vs. Method comparisonMean difference±SDt(p)Pearson r (p)
Tanita−215.9±214.7−4.5 (0.000)*0.571 (0.009)**
HB−202.9±218.6−4.1 (0.001)*0.582 (0.007)**
MSJ−140.5±211.2−3.0 (0.008)*0.604 (0.005)**
O−43.6±226.1−0.86 (0.399)0.614 (0.004)**
W−173.0±218.1−3.5 (0.002)*0.559 (0.010)*

Predictive equations for estimating the REE_

ReferenceFemaleMale
Mifflin St Jeor [9](9.99 × w) + (6.25 × H) − (4.92 × A) − 161(9.99 × W) + (6.25 × H) − (4.92 × A) + 5
Harris Benedict [19]655.09 + (9.56 × W) + (1.84 × H) − (4.67 × A)66.47 + (13.75 × W) + (5 × H) − (6.75 × A)
Owen et al. [21], Owen et al. [22](7.18 × W) + 795(10.2 × W) + 879
Wright et al. [23](9.02 × W) + (5.88 × H) − 7.47 × A + 110.76(9.27 × W) + (4.58 × H) − (6.53 × A) + 451.44
Harris Benedict adjusted from Tanita Corporation655.10 + (9.56 × W) + (1.85 × H) − (4.68 × A)66.47 + (13.75 × W) + (5 × H) − (6.76 × A)

Female subject’s characteristics comparison, before and after 6-month intervention_

Female (n=20)Mean±SDR
Before interventionAfter intervention%
REE (kcal/day)1400±2561305±260−7
REE (kJ/day)5864±10725465±1089−7
HB REE (kcal/day)1536 ±951507±95*−2
MSJ REE (kcal/day)1475±1151445±116*−2
O REE (kcal/day)1370±651348±64*−2
W REE (kcal/day)1505±1101477±111*−2
Tanita REE (kcal/day)1511±1221520±124+1
Weight (kg)80.1±9.177.0±9,0*−4
BMI (kg/m2)29.1±2.728.0±2.6*−4
Fat free mass (kg)49.3±4.048.3±3.9*−2
Total fat (kg)30.8±5.628.7±5.8*−7

Comparison of measured REE and estimated REE in male_

Measured REE vs. Method comparisonMean difference±SDt(p)Pearson r (p)
Tanita−419.9±218.5 *−6.9 (0.000)*0.235 (0.440)
HB−297.4±195.9*−5.1 (0.000)*0.322 (0.284)
MSJ0.553±181.70.011 (0.991)0.373 (0.210)
O−120.5±201.2−2.2 (0.052)0.094 (0.761)
W−183.8±179.8*−3.7 (0.003)*0.377 (0.205)

Male subjects’ characteristics comparison, before and after 6-month intervention_

Male (n=13)Mean±SDR
Before interventionAfter intervention%
REE (kcal/day)1882±2751700±191*−10
REE (kJ/day)7884±11547123±801*−10
HB REE (kcal/day)2036±1441979±136*−3
MSJ REE (kcal/day)1740±1141699±110*−2
O REE (kcal/day)1862±821820±83*−2
W REE (kcal/day)1922±1091884±102*−2
Tanita REE (kcal/day)2161±1582120±160−2
Weight (kg)96.4±8.192.3±8.1*−4
BMI (kg/m2)29.8±2.828.5±2.6*−4
Fat free mass (kg)72.6±4.571.0±4.4*−2
Total fat (kg)23.5±4.921.3±5.7*−10

Characteristics of the participants_

CharacteristicMean±SD
Female (n=20)Male (n=13)Total (n=33)
Age40.5±6.437.92±6.639.5±6.5
Height165.7±5.2180.0±6.5171.3±9.1
Weight (kg)80.1±9.196.4±8.186.5±11.8
Fat mass (%)38.2±3.124.2±3.532.7±7.6
Fat-free mass (kg)49.3±4.072.6±4.558.5±12.3
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Medizin, Klinische Medizin, Hygiene- und Umweltmedizin
Zeitschrift RSS Feed