[1. Micera S, Carpaneto J, Raspopovic S. Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2010; 3: 48–68.10.1109/RBME.2010.208542922275201]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Brookmeyer R, Ephraim PL, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 422–29.10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.00518295618]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Inkellis E, Low EE, Langhammer C, Morshed S. Incidence and characterization of major upper-extremity amputations in the national trauma data bank. JB JS Open Access 2018; 3(2): e0038.10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00038614556430280131]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Atkins D, Heard D, Donovan W. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot 1996; 8: 2–11.10.1097/00008526-199600810-00003]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Carey S, Lura D, Highsmith J. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review. J Prosthet Orthot 2017; 29: 14–1610.1097/JPO.0000000000000159]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Schultz AE, Baade SP, Kuiken TA. Expert opinions on success factors for upper-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 483–89.10.1682/JRRD.2006.08.008718247245]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Sheehan T. Rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration in upper limb amputation. In: Cifu D. authors. Braddom’s Physical medicine & rehabilitation 5th Ed.; Elsevier 2015; p.182-1835.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Antfolk C, Björkman A, Frank S, Sebelius F, Lundborg G, Rosen B. Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air- mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44:702–7.10.2340/16501977-100122729800]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Witteveen HJ, Rietman HS, Veltink PH. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2015; 39(3): 204–12.10.1177/030936461452226024567348]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Pasquina PF, Evangelista M, Carvalho AJ, Lockhart J, Griffin S, Nanos G, еt al. First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. J Neurosci Methods 2015; 244: 85–93.10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.016431737325102286]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85(5): 723–29.10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.00215129395]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Lawrence SM, Dhillon GS, Horch KW. Fabrication and characteristics of an implantable polymer-based intrafascicular electrode. J Neurosci Methods 2003; 131: 9–26.10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00231-0]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Micera S, Rossini MP, Rigosa J, Citi L, Carpaneto L, Raspopovic S, et al. Decoding of grasping information from neural signals recorded using peripheral intrafascicular interfaces. Ј Neuro Eng Rehabil 2011; 8(1): 53.10.1186/1743-0003-8-53]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Rossini PM, Micera S, Benvenuto A, Carpaneto J, Cavallo G, Citi L, et al. Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121(5): 777–83.10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Rossini PM, Rigosa J, Micera S, Assenza G, Rossini L, Ferreri F. Stump nerve signals during transcranial magnetic motor cortex stimulation recorded in an amputee via longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes. Exp Brain Res 2011; 210 (1): 1–11.10.1007/s00221-011-2571-9]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Petrini F, Mazzoni A, Rigosa J, Giambattistelli F, Granata G, Barra B, et al. Microneurography as a tool to develop decoding algorithms for peripheral neuro-controlled hand prostheses. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2019; 18: 44.10.1186/s12938-019-0659-9]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Boretius T, Badia J, Pascual-Font A, Schuettler M, NavarroX, Yoshida K. A transverse intrafascicular multi-channel electrode (TIME) to interface with the peripheral nerve. Biosens Bioelectron 2010; 26(1):62–9.10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.010]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Popović I, Isaković M, Živković V, Štrbac M, Radotić M, Bijelić G. Applications of sensory substitution using FES in transradial amputees. Balneoclimatology 2015; 39: 196–200.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Shannon G. A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979; 17: 73–80.10.1007/BF02440956]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, Grusser S. Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain. The Lancet 2001; 357: 1763–4.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04890-X]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Perović M, Stevanović M, Jevtić T, Štrbac M, Bijelić G, Vučetić C, et al. Electrical stimulation of the forearm: a method for transmitting sensory signals from the artificial hand to the brain. J Automat Control 2013; 21: 13– 18.10.2298/JAC1301013P]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Popović I, Isaković M, Simanić I, Štrbac M, Grujičić B, Belić G. Superficial electric stimulation as a feedback from myoelectric prosthesis for improving control of grip force. Balneoclimatology 2016; 196–200.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Antfolk C, D’Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013; 10(1); 45–54.10.1586/erd.12.6823278223]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Luchetti M, Cutti AG, Verni G, Sacchetti R, Rossi N. Impact of Michelangelo prosthetic hand: Findings from a crossover longitudinal study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2015; 52(5): 605–18.10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.028326437448]Search in Google Scholar
[25. D’Anna E, Popović I, Simanić I, Raspopović S et al. A somatotopic bidirectional hand prosthesis with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation based sensory feedback. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 10930.10.1038/s41598-017-11306-w558995228883640]Search in Google Scholar
[26. D’Anna E, Giacomo G, Mazzoni A, Strauss I, Iberite F, Patton P. A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Sci. Robot. 2018. doi.org/10.1101/262741.10.1101/262741]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Oddo CM, Raspopovic S, Artoni F, Mazzoni A, Spigler G, Petrini F, et al. Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans. Elife 2016; 5: e09148.10.7554/eLife.09148479896726952132]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Ortiz-Catalan M, Håkansson B, Brånemark R. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6(257): 257re6.10.1126/scitranslmed.300893325298322]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Schady W, Braune S, Watson S, Torebjörk HE, Schmidt R. Responsiveness of the somatosensory system after nerve injury and amputation in the human hand. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 68–7510.1002/ana.4103601148024265]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Clemente F, D’Alonzo M, Controzzi M, Edin B, Cipriani C. Non-invasive, temporally discrete feedback of object contact and release improves grasp control of closed-loop myoelectric transradial prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil 2016; 24: 1314–22.10.1109/TNSRE.2015.250058626584497]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Boretius T, Badia J, Pascual-Font A, Schuettler M, Navarro X, Yoshida K, et al. A transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) to interface with the peripheral nerve. Biosen Bioelectron 2010; 26: 62–9.10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.01020627510]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Raspopović S, Capogrosso M, Petrini FM, Bonizzato M, Rigosa J, Giovanni Di Pino G et al. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand pros-theses. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6: 222.10.1126/scitranslmed.300682024500407]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Tan D, Schiefer M,Keith M, Anderson JR, Tyler J. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6: 257.10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669551730525298320]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Sudipta P, Sanjeev K, Swati B, Soumendu G, Moumita G, Biswarup N, et al. Technical advancement on various bio-signal controlled arm- a review. J Mech Cont Math Sci 2018; 13: 95–111.10.26782/jmcms.2018.06.00007]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Pilarski P, Ann L Edwards A, Chan KM. Novel control strategies for arm prostheses: A partnership between man and machine. Jpn J Rehabil Med 2015; 52: 91–5.10.2490/jjrmc.52.91]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kuiken TA, Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Lock BA, Stubblefield K, et al. Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: A case study. Lancet 2007; 369: 371–80.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60193-7]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Zhou R, Jiang N, Englehartn K, Parker P. A computational model and simulation study of the efferent activity in the brachial nerves during voluntary motor intent. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010; 48: 67–77.10.1007/s11517-009-0555-819937394]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Kim L, McLeod R, Kiss Z. A new psychometric questionnaire for reporting of somatosensory percepts. J Neural Eng 2018; 15: 9.10.1088/1741-2552/aa966a29076455]Search in Google Scholar