<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Discectomy is a surgical procedure in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) if sciatica or neurological deficits occur and still persist after a course of conservative therapy. Standard discectomy (SD) and microdiscectomy (MD) are still equal in curent clinical practice. Many retrospective and prospective studies have shown that there is no clinically significant difference in the functional outcome after two treatment modalities.The aim of our study was to determine whether there are differences in the incidence of reoperation after performing SD and MD.The research included 545 patients with average period of postoperative follow-up of approximately 5.75 years. Standard discectomy was performed in 393 patients (72.11%), and micro-discectomy in 152 (27.8%) patients. The total number of reoperated patients was 37/545, or 6.78%. In the SD group, the number of reoperated patients was 33/393 (8.39%) and in the MD group 4/152 or 2.63%. Statistically significant difference (p &lt;0.05) was recorded in favor of the MD group.Although it has been proven that both SD and MD give good endpoints of treatment and similar functional recovery, the advantage is given to microdiscectomy due to statistically significantly lower rates of recurrent herniation. This result is attributed to better visualization of neural structures and pathological substrates, as well as their mutual relationship.</abstract>

Discectomy is a surgical procedure in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) if sciatica or neurological deficits occur and still persist after a course of conservative therapy. Standard discectomy (SD) and microdiscectomy (MD) are still equal in curent clinical practice. Many retrospective and prospective studies have shown that there is no clinically significant difference in the functional outcome after two treatment modalities.The aim of our study was to determine whether there are differences in the incidence of reoperation after performing SD and MD.The research included 545 patients with average period of postoperative follow-up of approximately 5.75 years. Standard discectomy was performed in 393 patients (72.11%), and micro-discectomy in 152 (27.8%) patients. The total number of reoperated patients was 37/545, or 6.78%. In the SD group, the number of reoperated patients was 33/393 (8.39%) and in the MD group 4/152 or 2.63%. Statistically significant difference (p <0.05) was recorded in favor of the MD group.Although it has been proven that both SD and MD give good endpoints of treatment and similar functional recovery, the advantage is given to microdiscectomy due to statistically significantly lower rates of recurrent herniation. This result is attributed to better visualization of neural structures and pathological substrates, as well as their mutual relationship.

Retrospective Analysis of Reoperation Rate After Standard Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy - Single Center Experience

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery

Experimental and Applied Biomedical Research (EABR)

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Discectomy is a surgical procedure in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) if sciatica or neurological deficits occur and still persist after a course...

Retrospective Analysis of Reoperation Rate After Standard Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy - Single Center Experience

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 205 - 211

Eingereicht: 24. Apr. 2019

Akzeptiert: 01. Mai 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjecr-2019-0023

Schlüsselwörter
hernia lumbar discus, microdiscectomy, standard discectomy, reoperation

© 2021 Vojin Kovacevic et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Retrospective Analysis of Reoperation Rate After Standard Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy - Single Center Experience

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 205 - 211

Eingereicht: 24. Apr. 2019

Akzeptiert: 01. Mai 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjecr-2019-0023

Schlüsselwörterhernia lumbar discus, microdiscectomy, standard discectomy, reoperation

© 2021 Vojin Kovacevic et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
hernia lumbar discus, microdiscectomy, standard discectomy, reoperation