[
1. Dunn J.M., Two, three, four, infinity: The path to the four-valued logic and beyond, New Essays on Belnap-Dunn Logic, ed. by H. Omori and H. Wansing, Cham: Springer, 2019, 77-97.10.1007/978-3-030-31136-0_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Feferman S. Toward Useful Type-Free Theories I, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1984, 49, 75-111.10.2307/2274093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Johnstone A. Self-reference, the Double Life and Godel, Logique et Analyse, 1981, 24, 35-47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Kauffman L.H., Knot Logic. In: Knots and Applications, ed. by L. Kauffman, World Scientific Pub., 1994, 1-110.10.1142/9789812796189_0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Kleene S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics. D. Van Nostrand Co., Princeton, 1950.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Konev B. Kontchakov R., Wolter F., Zakharyaschev M. On Dynamic Topological and Metric Logics, Studia Logica, 2006, 84, 129-160.10.1007/s11225-006-9005-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Leitgeb H., Truth and the Liar in De Morgan-Valued Models, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1999, 40(4), 496–514.10.1305/ndjfl/1012429715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Michael E., Peirce’s Paradoxical Solution to the Liar’s Paradox, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1975. XII, No. 3, 369-374.10.1305/ndjfl/1093891797
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Priest G., The Logic Paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1979, 8, 219-241.10.1007/BF00258428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Stepanov V., In defense of the self-referencing quantifier Sx. Approximation of self-referential sentences by dynamic systems, Logico-Philosophical Studies, 2021, 10.52119/LPHS.2021.49.50.014.10.52119/LPHS.2021.49.50.014
]Search in Google Scholar
