Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Individual-portal support with a pre-tensioned canopy for a coal mine roadway junction

,  und   
23. Sept. 2024

Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN

Figure 1:

Assumptions in the design of roadway junction supports (Rotkegel, 2013).
Assumptions in the design of roadway junction supports (Rotkegel, 2013).

Figure 2:

Spatial sketches of typical portal supports for three-way junctions: (a) at an acute angle and (b) at a right angle (Rotkegel, 2015).
Spatial sketches of typical portal supports for three-way junctions: (a) at an acute angle and (b) at a right angle (Rotkegel, 2015).

Figure 3:

Examples of portal support implementation for three-way junctions: (a) at an acute angle and (b) at a right angle (Rotkegel, 2015).
Examples of portal support implementation for three-way junctions: (a) at an acute angle and (b) at a right angle (Rotkegel, 2015).

Figure 4:

Support structure made of steel I-beams with the canopy reinforced by pre-tensioned cables: (a) cross section of canopy, (b) canopy with pre-tensioned cables and (c) position of canopy attached with column legs.
Support structure made of steel I-beams with the canopy reinforced by pre-tensioned cables: (a) cross section of canopy, (b) canopy with pre-tensioned cables and (c) position of canopy attached with column legs.

Figure 5.

Example of support for the roadway junction in the form of a rectangular portal: (a) cross section and (b) top view (1 – column legs, 2 – canopy, 3 – floor base).
Example of support for the roadway junction in the form of a rectangular portal: (a) cross section and (b) top view (1 – column legs, 2 – canopy, 3 – floor base).

Figure 6:

Example of polygonal portal made in the form of an arch – a support construction designed for the Bogdanka coal mine: (a) top view and (b) cross section.
Example of polygonal portal made in the form of an arch – a support construction designed for the Bogdanka coal mine: (a) top view and (b) cross section.

Figure 7:

The three-way roadway junction support is based on a portal made of the V profile steel frames: (a) top view and (b and c) cross section.
The three-way roadway junction support is based on a portal made of the V profile steel frames: (a) top view and (b and c) cross section.

Figure 8:

Numerical model of rock mass in FLAC3D.
Numerical model of rock mass in FLAC3D.

Figure 9:

Numerical model of the coal mine roadway and the configuration of their connection at different angles: (a) 30°, (b) 60° and (c) 90°.
Numerical model of the coal mine roadway and the configuration of their connection at different angles: (a) 30°, (b) 60° and (c) 90°.

Figure 10:

Vertical displacement of roof rock in the main roadway.
Vertical displacement of roof rock in the main roadway.

Figure 11:

Vertical displacement of floor rock in the main roadway.
Vertical displacement of floor rock in the main roadway.

Figure 12:

Vertical displacement of roof rock in the access roadway.
Vertical displacement of roof rock in the access roadway.

Figure 13:

Vertical displacement of floor rock in the access roadway.
Vertical displacement of floor rock in the access roadway.

Figure 14:

Failure zone of rock mass around the three-way roadway junction: (a) along the main roadway and (b) along the access roadway.
Failure zone of rock mass around the three-way roadway junction: (a) along the main roadway and (b) along the access roadway.

Figure 15:

Load patterns for the canopy beam.
Load patterns for the canopy beam.

Figure 16:

Dimensions of I-beam adopted for modelling.
Dimensions of I-beam adopted for modelling.

Figure 17:

Model of canopy made of a simple I-beam – Beam model.
Model of canopy made of a simple I-beam – Beam model.

Figure 18:

Distribution of reduced stresses (Pa) in the beam model of a canopy made of a single I-beam for various load patterns: (a) one-point load, (b) two-point load and (c) evenly distributed load.
Distribution of reduced stresses (Pa) in the beam model of a canopy made of a single I-beam for various load patterns: (a) one-point load, (b) two-point load and (c) evenly distributed load.

Figure 19:

Model of a canopy made of two I-beams with additional ribs – Shell model.
Model of a canopy made of two I-beams with additional ribs – Shell model.

Figure 20:

Model of a canopy made of two I-beams with one line of cables (Shell model + 4 cables).
Model of a canopy made of two I-beams with one line of cables (Shell model + 4 cables).

Figure 21:

Model of a canopy made of two I-beams with two lines of cables (Shell model + 8 cables).
Model of a canopy made of two I-beams with two lines of cables (Shell model + 8 cables).

Figure 22:

Calculation variants.
Calculation variants.

Figure 23:

Map of reduced stresses (Pa) in a model of a canopy made of two I-beams: (a) one-point load, (b) two-point load and (c) evenly distributed load (loading force – 500 kN).
Map of reduced stresses (Pa) in a model of a canopy made of two I-beams: (a) one-point load, (b) two-point load and (c) evenly distributed load (loading force – 500 kN).

Figure 24:

Maximum values of reduced stress of canopy for individual calculation variants: (a) 400-mm I-beam and (b) 450-mm I-beam (loading force – 500 kN).
Maximum values of reduced stress of canopy for individual calculation variants: (a) 400-mm I-beam and (b) 450-mm I-beam (loading force – 500 kN).

Figure 25:

Maximum values of canopy deflection for individual calculation variants: (a) 400-mm I-beam and (b) 450-mm I-beam (loading force – 500 kN).
Maximum values of canopy deflection for individual calculation variants: (a) 400-mm I-beam and (b) 450-mm I-beam (loading force – 500 kN).

Figure 26:

Maximum values of reduced stress of cables for individual calculation variants: (a) 400-mm I-beam and (b) 450-mm I-beam (yield strength of steel – 700 MPa)
Maximum values of reduced stress of cables for individual calculation variants: (a) 400-mm I-beam and (b) 450-mm I-beam (yield strength of steel – 700 MPa)

Figure 27:

Concentration of stresses (Pa) in the area of cable connections (canopy model made of two 400-mm I-beams with evenly distributed load of 500 kN, pre-tensioned force of cable of 200 kN): (a) one line of cables – 4 cables and (b) two lines of cables – 8 cables.
Concentration of stresses (Pa) in the area of cable connections (canopy model made of two 400-mm I-beams with evenly distributed load of 500 kN, pre-tensioned force of cable of 200 kN): (a) one line of cables – 4 cables and (b) two lines of cables – 8 cables.

Comparison of results of the bearing capacity analyses for the shell model and the beam model_

Load pattern Shell model Beam model

Max. reduced stress, σred, MPa Max. deflection, ƒ, mm Max. reduced stress, σred, MPa Max. deflection, ƒ, mm
258.21 15.91 292.5 18.44
189.90 14.13 218.1 16.80
118.87 9.72 146.3 11.52

Mechanical parameters of rock mass in the Cam Pha coal basin, Vietnam_

Rock type Bulk modulus, K (GPa) Shear modulus, G (GPa) Friction angle φ (deg.) Cohesion c (MPa) Tensile strength Rt (MPa) Density ρ (kg/m3)
Sandstone 3.94 2.58 32 4.0 1.20 2500
Mudstone 2.33 1.40 30 2.0 0.56 2700
Claystone 1.67 1.00 28 1.2 0.25 2600
Coal 1.25 0.58 25 0.8 0.10 1400
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Geowissenschaften, Geowissenschaften, andere, Materialwissenschaft, Verbundwerkstoffe, Poröse Materialien, Physik, Mechanik und Fluiddynamik