Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Assessing the Impact of Varying Fines and Antistripping Agent on Moisture Susceptibility in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures

, , , , , ,  und   
24. Aug. 2024

Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN

Figure 1:

A) Mixing of aggregates and bitumen in a mechanical mixing machine, B) loose mixture prepared for conditioning.
A) Mixing of aggregates and bitumen in a mechanical mixing machine, B) loose mixture prepared for conditioning.

Figure 2:

A) Core and trimmed specimen along with waste rings for SPT; B) core specimens for IDT.
A) Core and trimmed specimen along with waste rings for SPT; B) core specimens for IDT.

Figure 3:

A) Studs fixing using gauge point fixing device; B) clamps and LVDTs mounted on the sample.
A) Studs fixing using gauge point fixing device; B) clamps and LVDTs mounted on the sample.

Figure 4:

Measured dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.
Measured dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.

Figure 5:

IDT strength of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.
IDT strength of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.

Figure 6:

Measured resilient modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.
Measured resilient modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures with 3%, 6%, and 9% fines with and without freeze–thaw conditioning.

Figure 7:

Pareto plot illustrating standardized effects.
Pareto plot illustrating standardized effects.

Figure 8:

Visualization of absolute standardized effects in the half-normal plot.
Visualization of absolute standardized effects in the half-normal plot.

Figure 9:

Visualization of the standardized effect of the normal plot.
Visualization of the standardized effect of the normal plot.

Figure 10:

Main effects plot for dynamic modulus.
Main effects plot for dynamic modulus.

Figure 11.

Interaction plots for dynamic modulus.
Interaction plots for dynamic modulus.

Figure 12:

Cube plot for dynamic modulus.
Cube plot for dynamic modulus.

Figure 13:

Typical normal probability plot.
Typical normal probability plot.

Figure 14:

Typical residual versus fitted values.
Typical residual versus fitted values.

Figure 15:

Typical residual versus fitted values.
Typical residual versus fitted values.

Figure 16:

Validation plot between predicted and observed values.
Validation plot between predicted and observed values.

Job mix formula observations for mix having 3%, 6%, and 9% fines (ASTM Standard, D-3515, 2014)_

Parameters Criteria Measured Value Remarks (3%/6%/9%)

3% fines 6% fines 9% fines
Optimum asphalt content (%) NA 4.10 4.45 5.00 P/P/P
VMA (%) 14 14.10 14.10 16.60 P/P/P
VFA (%) 65–75 71.00 71.00 71.00 P/P/P
Stability (N) 8006 8630 8465 8110 P/P/P
Flow (mm) 2.0–3.5 2.55 2.85 3.10 P/P/P

Analysis of variance for dynamic modulus_

Sources DF SS MSS F-test p-value
Main effects 3 190,552,515 63,517,505 1336.0 0.000
2-way interactions 3 8,892,063 2,964,021 62.35 0.000
3-way interactions 1 464,442 464,442 9.77 0.014
Residual error 8 380,322 47,540
Total 1 200,289,341 47,540

Comparison of different parameters for moisture susceptibility_

Fines (%) Conditioning Dynamic modulus ratio at 10 (Hz) Tensile strength ratio Resilient modulus ratio

Without AS With AS Without AS With AS Without AS With AS
3% One cycle F-T 74 85 78 87 56 87
6% One cycle F-T 74 81 80 89 68 90
9% One cycle F-T 69 80 77 85 51 86

Factor's notations and their levels for analysis_

Factors Notation Levels
Frequency (Hz) A 0.1 25
Fines (%) B 3 9
Conditioning C Conditioned Unconditioned

Peak load values in indirect tensile strength test_

Fines Controlled unconditioned Controlled conditioned Antistripped and conditioned
3% 9200 (N) 7200 (N) 8000 (N)
6% 9500 (N) 7600 (N) 8500 (N)
9% 9100 (N) 7000 (N) 7700 (N)

Measured values of dynamic modulus with different percent fines and frequency_

Frequency (Hz) Fines (%) Conditioning Dynamic modulus (MPa)
0.1 3 Conditioned 805
0.1 3 Conditioned 1036
0.1 9 Conditioned 1100
25 3 Conditioned 5704
25 3 Unconditioned 7474
25 3 Conditioned 6268
25 9 Conditioned 7501
0.1 9 Conditioned 845
25 9 Unconditioned 10.376
25 9 Conditioned 7091
0.1 3 Unconditioned 963
0.1 9 Unconditioned 1423
25 9 Unconditioned 10.508
25 3 Unconditioned 7124
0.1 3 Unconditioned 966
0.1 9 Unconditioned 1550

Sieve size with different percentages of fines_

Sieve size Gradation with 3% fines Gradation with 6% fines Gradation with 9% fines

% Passing % Retained % Passing % Retained % Passing % Retained
3/4″ 100 0 100 0 100 0
1/2″ 80 20 85 15 86 14
3/8″ 67 13 70 13 74 12
#4 47 20 57 20 54 20
#8 28 19 37 20 34 20
#16 9 19 17 20 14 20
#200 4 5 12 5 9 5
Pan 3 6 9
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Geowissenschaften, Geowissenschaften, andere, Materialwissenschaft, Verbundwerkstoffe, Poröse Materialien, Physik, Mechanik und Fluiddynamik