Evaluation of the relative density based on flat dilatometer test

[1] Borowczyk, M., & Frankowski, Z. B. (1981). Dynamic and static sounding results interpretation. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Proc. 10th International Conference, Stockholm, June 1981. Vol. 2, (A.A. Balkema). BorowczykM. FrankowskiZ. B. 1981 Dynamic and static sounding results interpretation Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Proc. 10th International Conference Stockholm June 1981 2 (A.A. Balkema). Search in Google Scholar

[2] EN1997-2:2007. Eurocode 7. Geotechnical design - Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. CEN, Brussels. EN1997-2:2007 Eurocode 7. Geotechnical design - Part 2: Ground investigation and testing CEN, Brussels. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gruchot, A. (2019). Assessment of soil compaction and shear strength of the side dam of the Maziarnia water reservoir. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus, 18(3), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.15576/asp.fc/2019.18.3.133 GruchotA. 2019 Assessment of soil compaction and shear strength of the side dam of the Maziarnia water reservoir Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus 18 3 133 147 https://doi.org/10.15576/asp.fc/2019.18.3.133 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hawrysz, M., & Stróżyk, J. (2015). The controversial interpretation of dynamic probing results in engineering practice. Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika, 3, 203–207. (in Polish) HawryszM. StróżykJ. 2015 The controversial interpretation of dynamic probing results in engineering practice Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika 3 203 207 (in Polish) Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jamiolkowski, M., Leroueil, S., & lo Presti, D.C.F. (1991). Design parameters from theory to practice. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Coastal Development, Yokohama, Japan. JamiolkowskiM. LeroueilS. lo PrestiD.C.F. 1991 Design parameters from theory to practice Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Coastal Development Yokohama, Japan Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jamiolkowski, M., lo Presti, D. C. F., & Manassero, M. (2003). Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from CPT and DMT. https://doi.org/10.1061/40659(2003)7 JamiolkowskiM. lo PrestiD. C. F. ManasseroM. 2003 Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from CPT and DMT https://doi.org/10.1061/40659(2003)7 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jamiolkowski, M., lo Presti, D.C.F., & Manassero, M. (2001). Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from cone penetration test (CPT) and flat dilatometer test (DMT). ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 119, 201–238. JamiolkowskiM. lo PrestiD.C.F. ManasseroM. 2001 Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from cone penetration test (CPT) and flat dilatometer test (DMT) ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 119 201 238 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Koda, E., Tkaczyk, A., Lech, M., & Osiński, P. (2017). Application of Electrical Resistivity Data Sets for the Evaluation of the Pollution Concentration Level within Landfill Subsoil. Applied Sciences, 7(3):262, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030262 KodaE. TkaczykA. LechM. OsińskiP. 2017 Application of Electrical Resistivity Data Sets for the Evaluation of the Pollution Concentration Level within Landfill Subsoil Applied Sciences 7 3 262 https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030262 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Larsson, R. (1989). The dilatometer test for assessing soil layer sequences and properties in the ground. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Information No. 10. (in Swedish) LarssonR. 1989 The dilatometer test for assessing soil layer sequences and properties in the ground Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Information No. 10 (in Swedish) Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lech, M., Skutnik, Z., Bajda, M., & Markowska-Lech, K. (2020). Applications of Electrical Resistivity Surveys in Solving Selected Geotechnical and Environmental Problems. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(7):2263. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072263 LechM. SkutnikZ. BajdaM. Markowska-LechK. 2020 Applications of Electrical Resistivity Surveys in Solving Selected Geotechnical and Environmental Problems Applied Sciences 2020 10 7 2263 https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072263 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Marchetti, S. (1980). In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng, 106, 299–321. MarchettiS. 1980 In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng 106 299 321 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Marchetti, S. (1992). The Flat Dilatometer Test. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Publication No FHWA-SA-91-044. MarchettiS. 1992 The Flat Dilatometer Test U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Publication No FHWA-SA-91-044 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Marchetti, S., & Monaco, P. a. V. (2018). Recent improvements in the use, interpretation, and applications of DMT and SDMT in practice. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 41(5) https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj2017038 MarchettiS. MonacoP. a. V. 2018 Recent improvements in the use, interpretation, and applications of DMT and SDMT in practice Geotechnical Testing Journal 41 5 https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj2017038 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Mayne, P. W., Christopher, B. R., & DeJong, J. (2002). Subsurface Investigations — Geotechnical Site Characterization Reference Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NHI Course No. 132031, 132031. MayneP. W. ChristopherB. R. DeJongJ. 2002 Subsurface Investigations — Geotechnical Site Characterization Reference Manual U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NHI Course No. 132031 132031. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Meardi, G. (1971). Discussion: The Correlation of Cone Size in the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test with the Standard Penetration Test. Geotechnique, 21, 184–190. MeardiG. 1971 Discussion: The Correlation of Cone Size in the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test with the Standard Penetration Test Geotechnique 21 184 190 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Młynarek, Z. (2013). Session report: Direct push-in in situ test. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Site Characterization 4, ISC-4, 1. MłynarekZ. 2013 Session report: Direct push-in in situ test Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Site Characterization 4, ISC-4 1. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Młynarek, Z., Wierzbicki, J., & Wołyński W. (2018). Use of functional cluster analysis of CPTU data for assessment of a subsoil rigidity. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 40(2): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2018-0017 MłynarekZ. WierzbickiJ. WołyńskiW. 2018 Use of functional cluster analysis of CPTU data for assessment of a subsoil rigidity Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 40 2 117 124 https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2018-0017 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Młynarek, Z., Wierzbicki, J., & Lunne, T. (2021). Usefulness of the CPTU method in evaluating shear modulus G₀ changes in the subsoil. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 43(3) 195–205. https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0008 MłynarekZ. WierzbickiJ. LunneT. 2021 Usefulness of the CPTU method in evaluating shear modulus G₀ changes in the subsoil Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 43 3 195 205 https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0008 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Nepelski, K. (2020). Interpretation of CPT and SDMT tests for Lublin loess soils exemplified by Cyprysowa research site. Budownictwo i Architektura, 18(3) 063–072. https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.890. NepelskiK. 2020 Interpretation of CPT and SDMT tests for Lublin loess soils exemplified by Cyprysowa research site Budownictwo i Architektura 18 3 063 072 https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.890. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pinheiro, C., Molina-Gómez, F., Rios, S., Viana da Fonseca, A., & Miranda, T. (2018). Correlations between Dynamic Penetrometer Light and Cone Penetration Tests in Intermediate Soils: a Statistical Comparison. XIX Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica Geotecnia e Desenvolvimento Urbano COBRAMSEG 2018, Brasil, 1–9. PinheiroC. Molina-GómezF. RiosS. Viana da FonsecaA. MirandaT. 2018 Correlations between Dynamic Penetrometer Light and Cone Penetration Tests in Intermediate Soils: a Statistical Comparison XIX Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica Geotecnia e Desenvolvimento Urbano COBRAMSEG 2018 Brasil 1 9 Search in Google Scholar

[21] PN-B-04452:2002. Geotechnics. In situ investigations. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, Warsaw. (in Polish). PN-B-04452:2002 Geotechnics In situ investigations. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, Warsaw. (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

[22] Rabarijoely S. (2018). A New Approach to the Determination of Mineral and Organic Soil Types Based on Dilatometer Tests (DMT). Applied Sciences 8(11):2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112249 RabarijoelyS. 2018 A New Approach to the Determination of Mineral and Organic Soil Types Based on Dilatometer Tests (DMT) Applied Sciences 8 11 2249 https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112249 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Rabarijoely, S., Lech, M., & Bajda, M. (2021). Determination of Relative Density and Degree of Saturation in Mineral Soils Based on In Situ Tests. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 14(22), 6963. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226963 RabarijoelyS. LechM. BajdaM. 2021 Determination of Relative Density and Degree of Saturation in Mineral Soils Based on In Situ Tests Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 14 22 6963 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226963 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Reynolds, J.M. (2011). An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. New 437 York. ReynoldsJ.M. 2011 An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics John Wiley and Sons Ltd. New 437 York. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Tanaka, H., & Tanaka, M. (1998). Characterization of sandy soils using CPT and DMT. Soils and Foundations, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.3_55 TanakaH. TanakaM. 1998 Characterization of sandy soils using CPT and DMT Soils and Foundations 38 3 https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.3_55 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tarnawski M. (2010). The need for verification of the interpretation of dynamic tests. Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika, 31(3), 441–443. (in Polish) TarnawskiM. 2010 The need for verification of the interpretation of dynamic tests Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika 31 3 441 443 (in Polish) Search in Google Scholar

[27] Totani, G., Marchetti, S., Monaco, P., & Calabrese, M. (2001). Use of the Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT) in geotechnical design. Intnl. Conf. On In situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Bali, Indonesia, 1–6. TotaniG. MarchettiS. MonacoP. CalabreseM. 2001 Use of the Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT) in geotechnical design Intnl. Conf. On In situ Measurement of Soil Properties Bali, Indonesia 1 6 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ura, M., & Tarnawski, M. (2014). Interpretation of relative density of non-cohesive soils on the grounds of static and dynamic penetrometer results. Przegląd geologiczny, 62(10/2), 715–720 (in Polish). UraM. TarnawskiM. 2014 Interpretation of relative density of non-cohesive soils on the grounds of static and dynamic penetrometer results Przegląd geologiczny 62 10/2 715 720 (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

[29] Virsis, E., Paeglitis, A., & Jateikienė, L. (2023). Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Soil Properties Determined Using Interpretations of Dilatometer Test (DMT) and Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Methods. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 18(2) https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2023-18.605 VirsisE. PaeglitisA. JateikienėL. 2023 Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Soil Properties Determined Using Interpretations of Dilatometer Test (DMT) and Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Methods The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 18 2 https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2023-18.605 Search in Google Scholar