Overstrength and ductility factors of XBF structures with pinned and fixed supports

[1] European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1-1. Brussels. European Committee for Standardization 2005 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings EN 1998-1-1 Brussels Search in Google Scholar

[2] UBC Standards. (1997). Volume 2 of the Uniform Building Code: Structural engineering design provisions. UBC97. Whittier. UBC Standards 1997 Volume 2 of the Uniform Building Code: Structural engineering design provisions. UBC97 Whittier Search in Google Scholar

[3] Louzai, A. & Abed, A. (2015). Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13 (6), 1773–1793. DOI:10.1007/s10518-014-9689-7. LouzaiA. AbedA. 2015 Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 6 1773 1793 10.1007/s10518-014-9689-7 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Elghazouli, A. Y. (2010). Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8 (1), 65–89. DOI:10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6. ElghazouliA. Y. 2010 Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8 1 65 89 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Ferraioli, M., Lavino, A. & Mandara, A. (2014). Behaviour Factor of Code-Designed Steel Moment-Resisting Frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14 (2), 243–254. DOI:10.1007/s13296-014-2005-1. FerraioliM. LavinoA. MandaraA. 2014 Behaviour Factor of Code-Designed Steel Moment-Resisting Frames International Journal of Steel Structures 14 2 243 254 10.1007/s13296-014-2005-1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Balendra, T. & Huang, X. (2003). Overstrength and Ductility Factors for Steel Frames Designed According to BS 5950. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 129 (8), 1019–1035. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019). BalendraT. HuangX. 2003 Overstrength and Ductility Factors for Steel Frames Designed According to BS 5950 Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 129 8 1019 1035 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019). Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kim, J. & Choi, H. (2005). Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames. Engineering Structures, 27 (2), 285–300. DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009. KimJ. ChoiH. 2005 Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames Engineering Structures 27 2 285 300 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Mahmoudi, M. & Zaree, M. (2010). Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66 (10), 1196–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004. MahmoudiM. ZareeM. 2010 Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66 10 1196 1204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Faggiano, B., Antonio Formisano, L. F., Macillo, V., Castaldo, C. & Mazzolani, F. M. (2014). Assessment of the Design Provisions for Steel Concentric X Bracing Frames with Reference to Italian and European Codes. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 8 (Suppl 1: M3), 208–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874836801408010208. FaggianoB. Antonio FormisanoL. F. MacilloV. CastaldoC. MazzolaniF. M. 2014 Assessment of the Design Provisions for Steel Concentric X Bracing Frames with Reference to Italian and European Codes The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal 8 Suppl 1: M3 208 215 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874836801408010208. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Fanaie, N. & Shamlou, S. O. (2015). Response modification factor of mixed structures. Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal, 19 (6), 1449–1466. DOI: 10.12989/scs.2015.19.6.1449. FanaieN. ShamlouS. O. 2015 Response modification factor of mixed structures Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal 19 6 1449 1466 10.12989/scs.2015.19.6.1449 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[11] Kheyrodin, A. & Mashadiali, N. (2018). Response modification factor of concentrically braced frames with hexagonal pattern of braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 148, 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.024. KheyrodinA. MashadialiN. 2018 Response modification factor of concentrically braced frames with hexagonal pattern of braces Journal of Constructional Steel Research 148 658 668 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.024. Search in Google Scholar

[12] European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1993-1-1. Brussels. European Committee for Standardization 2005 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings EN 1993-1-1 Brussels Search in Google Scholar

[13] Azad, S. K., Topkaya, C. & Astaneh-Asl, A (2017). Seismic behaviour of concentrically braced frames designed to AISC341 and EC8 provisions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 133, pp. 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.02.026. AzadS. K. TopkayaC. Astaneh-AslA 2017 Seismic behaviour of concentrically braced frames designed to AISC341 and EC8 provisions Journal of Constructional Steel Research 133 383 404 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.02.026. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ostraas, J. D., & Kraeinkler, H. (1990). STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY CONSIDERATIONS IN SEISMIC DESIGN. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA. (Report No.90). OstraasJ. D. KraeinklerH. 1990 STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY CONSIDERATIONS IN SEISMIC DESIGN The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University California, USA (Report No.90). Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rahgozar, M. A. & Humar, J. L. (1998). Accounting for overstrength in seismic design of steel structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25 (1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1139/l97-045. RahgozarM. A. HumarJ. L. 1998 Accounting for overstrength in seismic design of steel structures Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 25 1 1 15 10.1139/l97-045 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Fanaie, N. & Afsar Dizaj, E. (2014). Response modification factor of the frames braced with reduced yielding segment BRB. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An International Journal, 50 (1), 1–17. DOI: 10.12989/sem.2014.50.1.001. FanaieN. Afsar DizajE. 2014 Response modification factor of the frames braced with reduced yielding segment BRB Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An International Journal 50 1 1 17 10.12989/sem.2014.50.1.001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Attia, W. A. & Irheem, M. M. M. (2018). Boundary condition effect on response modification factor of X-braced steel frames, HBRC Journal, 4 (1), pp. 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2016.03.002. AttiaW. A. IrheemM. M. M. 2018 Boundary condition effect on response modification factor of X-braced steel frames HBRC Journal 4 1 104 121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2016.03.002. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kappos, A. J. (1999). Evaluation of behaviour factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies. Engineering Structures, 21 (9), 823–835. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00050-9. KapposA. J. 1999 Evaluation of behaviour factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies Engineering Structures 21 9 823 835 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00050-9. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Mazzolani, F. M. & Piluso, V. (1996). Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames. London: E & FN Spon, An imprint of Chapman & Hall. MazzolaniF. M. PilusoV. 1996 Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames London E & FN Spon, An imprint of Chapman & Hall Search in Google Scholar

[20] ATC Standards. (1995). Applied Technology Council: A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design. ATC-34. Redwood City. ATC Standards 1995 Applied Technology Council: A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design. ATC-34 Redwood City Search in Google Scholar

[21] Abdollahzadeh, G. & Banihashemi, M. (2013). Response modification factor of dual moment-resistant frame with buckling restrained brace (BRB). Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal, 14 (6), 621–636. DOI: 10.12989/scs.2013.14.6.621. AbdollahzadehG. BanihashemiM. 2013 Response modification factor of dual moment-resistant frame with buckling restrained brace (BRB) Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal 14 6 621 636 10.12989/scs.2013.14.6.621 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Yahmi, D., Branci, T., Bouchaïr, A. & Fournely, E. (2018). Evaluating the Behaviour Factor of Medium Ductile SMRF Structures. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 62 (2), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.10419. YahmiD. BranciT. BouchaïrA. FournelyE. 2018 Evaluating the Behaviour Factor of Medium Ductile SMRF Structures Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 62 2 373 385 https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.10419. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dehghani, E., Hamidi, S. A., Tehrani, F. M., Goyal, A., Mirghaderi, R. (2015). New Practical Approach to Plastic Analysis of Steel Structures. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 59 (1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7578. DehghaniE. HamidiS. A. TehraniF. M. GoyalA. MirghaderiR. 2015 New Practical Approach to Plastic Analysis of Steel Structures Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 59 1 27 35 https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7578. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Nassar, A., & Krawinkler, H. (1991). Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA. (Report No. 95). NassarA. KrawinklerH. 1991 Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University California, USA (Report No. 95). Search in Google Scholar

[25] Fajfar, P. (2000). A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 16 (3), 573–592. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128. FajfarP. 2000 A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design Earthquake Spectra 16 3 573 592 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Mahmoudi, M. & Zaree, M. (2013). Determination the response modification factors of buckling restrained braced frames. Procedia Engineering, 54, 222–231. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.020. MahmoudiM. ZareeM. 2013 Determination the response modification factors of buckling restrained braced frames Procedia Engineering 54 222 231 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.020 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Yahmi, D., Branci, T., Bouchaïr, A. & Fournely, E. (2017). Evaluation of behaviour factors of steel moment-resisting frames using standard pushover method. Procedia Engineering, 199, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.130. YahmiD. BranciT. BouchaïrA. FournelyE. 2017 Evaluation of behaviour factors of steel moment-resisting frames using standard pushover method Procedia Engineering 199 397 403 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.130. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Farshid, F. & Sepideh, R. (2020). Supervised probabilistic failure prediction of tuned mass damper-equipped high steel frames using machine learning methods. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 42(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0043. FarshidF. SepidehR. 2020 Supervised probabilistic failure prediction of tuned mass damper-equipped high steel frames using machine learning methods Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 42 3 179 190 https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0043. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kamaris, G. S., Vallianatou, Y. M. & Beskos, D. E. (2012). Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10 (6), 1745–1766. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9387-2. KamarisG. S. VallianatouY. M. BeskosD. E. 2012 Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 6 1745 1766 10.1007/s10518-012-9387-2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI). (2010). Structural Analysis Program: Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures. SAP2000. Berkeley. Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI) 2010 Structural Analysis Program: Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures. SAP2000 Berkeley Search in Google Scholar

[31] Mondal, A., Ghosh, S. & Reddy, G. R. (2013). Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames. Engineering Structures, 56, 1808–1819. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038. MondalA. GhoshS. ReddyG. R. 2013 Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames Engineering Structures 56 1808 1819 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). American Society of Civil Engineers: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. FEMA 356. Washington. Federal Emergency Management Agency 2000 American Society of Civil Engineers: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. FEMA 356 Washington Search in Google Scholar

[33] Gholipour, M. & Alinia, M. M. (2016). Considerations on the Pushover Analysis of Multi-Story Steel Plate Shear Wall Structures. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 60 (1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7706. GholipourM. AliniaM. M. 2016 Considerations on the Pushover Analysis of Multi-Story Steel Plate Shear Wall Structures Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 60 1 113 126 https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7706. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Branci, T., Yahmi, D. & BOUYAKOUB, S. (2020). ANALYSE STATIQUE NON LINÉAIRE D’OSSATURES MÉTALLIQUES CONTREVENTÉES PAR PALÉES EN X. ALGÉRIE ÉQUIPEMENT, 62, 01–07. BranciT. YahmiD. BOUYAKOUBS. 2020 ANALYSE STATIQUE NON LINÉAIRE D’OSSATURES MÉTALLIQUES CONTREVENTÉES PAR PALÉES EN X ALGÉRIE ÉQUIPEMENT 62 01 07 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Karavasilis, T. L., Bazeos, N. & Beskos, D. E. (2006). Maximum displacement profiles for the performance based seismic design of plane steel moment resisting frames. Engineering Structures, 28(1), 9–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.021. KaravasilisT. L. BazeosN. BeskosD. E. 2006 Maximum displacement profiles for the performance based seismic design of plane steel moment resisting frames Engineering Structures 28 1 9 22 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.021 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Banihashemi, M. R., Mirzagoltabar, A. R. & Tavakoli, H. R. (2015). Development of the performance based plastic design for steel moment resistant frame. International Journal of Steel Structures, 15 (1), 51–62. DOI: 10.1007/s13296-015-3004-6. BanihashemiM. R. MirzagoltabarA. R. TavakoliH. R. 2015 Development of the performance based plastic design for steel moment resistant frame International Journal of Steel Structures 15 1 51 62 10.1007/s13296-015-3004-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Xiong, E., He, H., Cui, F. & Bai, L. (2016). Performance-Based Plastic Design Method for Steel Concentrically Braced Frames Using Target Drift and Yield Mechanism. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 60 (1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7383. XiongE. HeH. CuiF. BaiL. 2016 Performance-Based Plastic Design Method for Steel Concentrically Braced Frames Using Target Drift and Yield Mechanism Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 60 1 127 134 https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7383. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Branci, T., Yahmi, D., Bouchaïr, A. & Fournely, E. (2016). Evaluation of Behavior Factor for Steel Moment-Resisting Frames. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 10(3), 358–362. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123588. BranciT. YahmiD. BouchaïrA. FournelyE. 2016 Evaluation of Behavior Factor for Steel Moment-Resisting Frames International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 10 3 358 362 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123588. Search in Google Scholar