Genomic predictions and candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms for growth, form, and wood properties of teak clones

1Allwright MR, Payne A, Emiliani G, Milner S, Viger M, Rouse F, Keurentjes JJ, Bérard A, Wildhagen H, Faivre-Rampant P (2016) Biomass traits and candidate genes for bioenergy revealed through association genetics in coppiced European Populus nigra (L.). Biotechnology for biofuels 9(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0603-1Search in Google Scholar

2Ansari SA, Narayanan C, Wali SA, Kumar R, Shukla N, Rahangdale SK (2012) ISSR markers for analysis of molecular diversity and genetic structure of Indian teak (Tectona grandis Lf) populations. Annals of forest research: 11-23. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2012.71Search in Google Scholar

3Badilla Y, Xavier A, Murillo O, Paiva HN (2016) IBA efficiency on mini-cutting rooting from Teak (Tectona grandis Linn F.) clones. Revista Árvore 40: 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000300011Search in Google Scholar

4Badilla-Valverde Y, Murillo-Gambo O, Espinoza-Pizarro M (2023) Optimization of controlled pollination techniques in Tectona grandis, Linn isf. Revista Forestal Mesoamericana Kurú 20(46): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18845/rfmk.v20i46.6597Search in Google Scholar

5Balakrishnan S, Ramasamy Y, Dev SA (2023) An overview of teak genetic improvement towards conservation of genetic resources in a changing climate with special emphasis on India. Tree Genetics & Genomes 19(3): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-023-01604-ySearch in Google Scholar

6Ballesta P, Bush D, Silva FF, Mora F (2020) Genomic predictions using low-density SNP markers, pedigree and GWAS information: a case study with the non-model species Eucalyptus cladocalyx. Plants 9(1): 99.Search in Google Scholar

7Bian Y, Holland JB (2017) Enhancing genomic prediction with genome-wide association studies in multiparental maize populations. Heredity 118(6): 585-593. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2017.4Search in Google Scholar

8Burdon RD, Klápště J (2019) Alternative selection methods and explicit or implied economic-worth functions for different traits in tree breeding. Tree Genetics & Genomes 15(6): 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-019-1384-z Search in Google Scholar

9Callister AN (2013) Genetic parameters and correlations between stem size, forking, and flowering in teak (Tectona grandis). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 43: 1145-1150. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0226Search in Google Scholar

10Callister AN (2021) Genetic Improvement of Teak. The Teak Genome. Ramasamy Y, Galeano E, Win TT, Springer International Publishing: 191-218.Search in Google Scholar

11Callister AN, Bradshaw BP, Elms S, Gillies RW, Sasse JM, Brawner JT (2021) Single-step genomic BLUP enables joint analysis of disconnected breeding programs: an example with Eucalyptus globulus Labill. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab253Search in Google Scholar

12Callister AN, Collins SL (2008) Genetic parameter estimates in a clonally replicated progeny test of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.). Tree Genetics & Genomes 4(2): 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0104-2Search in Google Scholar

13Cappa EP, El-Kassaby YA, Garcia MN, Acuña C, Borralho NM, Grattapaglia D, Marcucci Poltri SN (2013) Impacts of population structure and analytical models in genome-wide association studies of complex traits in forest trees: a case study in Eucalyptus globulus. PloS one 8(11): e81267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081267Search in Google Scholar

14Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Molecular ecology 22(11): 3124-3140. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12354Search in Google Scholar

15Chamberland V, Robichaud F, Perron M, Gélinas N, Bousquet J, Beaulieu J (2020) Conventional versus genomic selection for white spruce improvement: a comparison of costs and benefits of plantations on Quebec public lands. Tree Genetics & Genomes 16(1): 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-019-1409-7Search in Google Scholar

16Chen Z-Q, Zan Y, Milesi P, Zhou L, Chen J, Li L, Cui B, Niu S, Westin J, Karlsson B (2021) Leveraging breeding programs and genomic data in Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) for GWAS analysis. Genome biology 22(1): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02392-1Search in Google Scholar

17Chen Z-Q, Zan Y, Zhou L, Karlsson B, Tuominen H, García-Gil MR, Wu HX (2022) Genetic architecture behind developmental and seasonal control of tree growth and wood properties in Norway spruce. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 927673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.927673Search in Google Scholar

18Chhetri HB, Macaya-Sanz D, Kainer D, Biswal AK, Evans LM, Chen JG, Collins C, Hunt K, Mohanty SS, Rosenstiel T (2019) Multitrait genome-wide association analysis of Populus trichocarpa identifies key polymorphisms controlling morphological and physiological traits. New Phytologist 223(1): 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15777Search in Google Scholar

19Danarto S, Hardiyanto EB (2001) Results of the progeny test of teak at 12 years of age at Jember, East Java. Potentials and Opportunities in Marketing and Trade of Plantation Teak: Challenge for the New Millennium. Proceedings of the Third Regional Seminar on Teak July 31 - August 4, 2000, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Faculty of Forestry Gadjah Mada University.Search in Google Scholar

20Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15): 2156-2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330Search in Google Scholar

21Darmawan W, Nandika D, Sari RK, Sitompul A, Rahayu I, Gardner D (2015) Juvenile and mature wood characteristics of short and long rotation teak in Java. IAWA journal 36(4): 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-20150112Search in Google Scholar

22Desta ZA, Ortiz R (2014) Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. Trends in plant science 19(9): 592-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.05.006Search in Google Scholar

23Dev SA, Ramasamy Y (2021) Genome of Teak: Structure and Features. The Teak Genome, Springer: 237-251.Search in Google Scholar

24Fahrenkrog AM, Neves LG, Resende Jr MF, Vazquez AI, de Los Campos G, Dervinis C, Sykes R, Davis M, Davenport R, Barbazuk WB (2017) Genome-wide association study reveals putative regulators of bioenergy traits in Populus deltoides. New Phytologist 213(2): 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14154Search in Google Scholar

25Fallas JL (2017) Funciones alométricas, de volumen y de crecimiento para clones de teca (Tectona grandis L.f) en Costa Rica. M. Sc., Escuela de Ingeniería Forestal. Cartago, Costa Rica.Search in Google Scholar

26Fofana IJ, Ofori D, Poitel M, Verhaegen D (2009) Diversity and genetic structure of teak (Tectona grandis L.f) in its natural range using DNA microsatellite markers. New Forests 37: 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9116-5Search in Google Scholar

27Galli G, Gezan SA, Murillo DA, Murray D (2022) ASRgwas: An R package to perform complex Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Version 1.0.0. . VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom.Search in Google Scholar

28Gezan SA, de Oliveira AA, Murray D (2021) ASRgenomics: An R package with Complementary Genomic Functions. Version 1.0.0 VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom.Search in Google Scholar

29Gianola D (2013) Priors in whole-genome regression: the Bayesian alphabet returns. Genetics 194(3): 573-596. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.151753Search in Google Scholar

30Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136(2): 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0Search in Google Scholar

31Goh DKS, Chaix G, Baillères H, Monteuuis O (2007) Mass production and quality control of teak clones for tropical plantations: The Yayasan Sabah Group and Forestry Department of Cirad Joint Project as a case study. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 293: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2007.293.a20343Search in Google Scholar

32Grattapaglia D (2022) Twelve years into genomic selection in forest trees: climbing the slope of enlightenment of marker assisted tree breeding. Forests 13(10): 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101554Search in Google Scholar

33Grattapaglia D, Resende MD (2011) Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7: 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-010-0328-4Search in Google Scholar

34Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ (2011) Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC bioinformatics 12(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-186Search in Google Scholar

35Hansen O, Changtragoon S, Ponoy B, Kjaer E, Minn Y, Finkeldey R, Nielsen K, Graudal L (2015) Genetic resources of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.)— strong genetic structure among natural populations. Tree Genetics and Genomes. 11: 802.Search in Google Scholar

36Hansen OK, Changtragoon S, Ponoy B, Lopez J, Richard J, Kjaer ED (2017) Worldwide translocation of teak - origin of landraces and present genetic base. Tree Genetics & Genomes 13(87). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-017-1170-8Search in Google Scholar

37Huang G, Liang K, Zhou Z, Ma H (2016) SSR genotyping—genetic diversity and fingerprinting of teak (Tectona grandis) clones. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 28(1): 48-58. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/43748078 Search in Google Scholar

38Husen A, Pal M (2003) Effect of serial bud grafting and etiolation on rejuvenation and rooting cutttings of mature trees of Tectona grandis Linn. f. Silvae Genetica 52(2): 84-88.Search in Google Scholar

39Isik F (2022). Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits Complex traits in Perennial Plants: A Case for Forest Trees Forest trees. Genomic prediction of complex traits: Methods and Protocols, Springer: 493-520.Search in Google Scholar

40Izekor D, Fuwape J, Oluyege A (2010) Effects of density on variations in the mechanical properties of plantation grown Tectona grandis wood. Archives of Applied Science Research 2(6): 113-120.Search in Google Scholar

41Kokutse AD, Stokes A, Baillères H, Kokou K, Baudasse C (2006) Decay resistance of Togolese teak (Tectona grandis L.f) heartwood and relationship with colour. Trees 20: 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0028-0Search in Google Scholar

42Korte A, Farlow A (2013) The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9(1): 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-29Search in Google Scholar

43Lebedev VG, Lebedeva TN, Chernodubov AI, Shestibratov KA (2020) Genomic selection for forest tree improvement: Methods, achievements and perspectives. Forests 11(11): 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111190Search in Google Scholar

44Lefouili M, Nam K (2022) The evaluation of Bcftools mpileup and GATK HaplotypeCaller for variant calling in non-human species. Scientific Reports 12(1): 11331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15563-2Search in Google Scholar

45Li H (2011) A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27(21): 2987-2993. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509Search in Google Scholar

46Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows– Wheeler transform. bioinformatics 25(14): 1754-1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324Search in Google Scholar

47Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Subgroup GPDP (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. bioinformatics 25(16): 2078-2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352Search in Google Scholar

48Mandal AK, Chawhan PH (2005) Investigations on inheritance of growth and wood properties and their interrelationships in teak. International Conference on Quality Timber products of Teak from Sustainable Forest management. Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala, India, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and International Tropical Timber Organisation, Japan 506-510.Search in Google Scholar

49Mandal AK, Rambabu N (2001) Quantitative Genetic Aspects of Teak Improvement. Genetics and Silviculture of Teak. Mandal AK, Ansari SA. Dehra Dun, International Book Distributors: 134-145.Search in Google Scholar

50McKown AD, Klápště J, Guy RD, Geraldes A, Porth I, Hannemann J, Friedmann M, Muchero W, Tuskan GA, Ehlting J (2014) Genome-wide association implicates numerous genes underlying ecological trait variation in natural populations of Populus trichocarpa. New Phytologist 203(2): 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12815Search in Google Scholar

51Metzker ML (2010) Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nature reviews genetics 11(1): 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2626Search in Google Scholar

52Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819Search in Google Scholar

53Money D, Gardner K, Migicovsky Z, Schwaninger H, Zhong G-Y, Myles S (2015) LinkImpute: Fast and Accurate Genotype Imputation for Non-Model Organisms. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics g3.115.021667. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.021667Search in Google Scholar

54Monteuuis O, Goh DKS, Garcia C, Alloysius D, Gidiman J, Bacilieri R, Chaix G (2011) Genetic variation of growth and tree quality traits among 42 diverse genetic origins of Tectona grandis planted under humid tropical conditions in Sabah, East Malaysia. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7(6): 1263-1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0411-5Search in Google Scholar

55Monteuuis O, Vallauri D, Poupard C, Hazard L, Yusof Y, Wahap Latip A, Garcia C, Chauviere M (1995). Propagation clonale de tecks matures par bouturage horticole. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 243: 25-39.Search in Google Scholar

56Moya R, Marin JD, Murillo O, Leandro L (2013) Wood physical properties, color, decay resistance and stiffness in Tectona grandis clones with evidence of genetic control. Silvae Genetica 62(3): 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2013-0019Search in Google Scholar

57Moya R, Tenorio C (2021) Wood properties and their variations in teak. The Teak Genome, Springer: 103-137.Search in Google Scholar

58Mphahlele MM, Isik F, Mostert-O’Neill MM, Reynolds SM, Hodge GR, Myburg AA (2020) Expected benefits of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in Eucalyptus grandis. Tree Genetics and Genomes 16(4): 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-020-01443-1Search in Google Scholar

59Müller BS, de Almeida Filho JE, Lima BM, Garcia CC, Missiaggia A, Aguiar AM, Takahashi E, Kirst M, Gezan SA, Silva-Junior OB (2019) Independent and Joint-GWAS for growth traits in Eucalyptus by assembling genome-wide data for 3373 individuals across four breeding populations. New Phytolo-gist 221(2): 818-833. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15449Search in Google Scholar

60Murillo O (2011) Forest Evaluation and Appraisal. Software Version 2023Search in Google Scholar

61Murillo O, Resende MDV, Badilla Y, Gamboa JP (2019) Genotype by environment interaction and teak (Tectona grandis L.) selection in Costa Rica. Silvae Genetica 68: 116-121. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2019-0020Search in Google Scholar

62Murillo O, Wright J, Monteuuis O, Montenegro F (2013) Mejoramiento genético de la teca en América Latina. Las plantaciones de teca en América Latina: Mitos y realidades. Camino R, Aymerich JM. Costa Rica, CATIE: 86-111. Search in Google Scholar

63Naranjo SS, Moya R, Chauhan S (2012) Early selection of morphology and some wood properties of Tectona grandis L. clones. Silvae Genetica 61(1/2): 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2012-0008Search in Google Scholar

64Narayanan C, Wali S, Shukla N, Kumar R, Mandal A, Ansari S (2007) RAPD and ISSR markers for molecular characterization of teak (Tectona grandis) plus trees. Journal of Tropical Forest Science: 218-225. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/43595390Search in Google Scholar

65Neale DB, Kremer A (2011) Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications. Nature Reviews Genetics 12(2): 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2931Search in Google Scholar

66Pandey D, Brown C (2000) Teak: a global overview. Unasylva 201 51: 3-13.Search in Google Scholar

67Park T, Casella G (2008) The bayesian lasso. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(482): 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000337Search in Google Scholar

68Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS genetics 2(12): e190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190Search in Google Scholar

69Pérez P, de Los Campos G (2014) Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics 198(2): 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.164442Search in Google Scholar

70Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE (2012) Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PloS one 7(5): e37135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037135Search in Google Scholar

71Porth I, Klapšte J, Skyba O, Hannemann J, McKown AD, Guy RD, DiFazio SP, Muchero W, Ranjan P, Tuskan GA (2013) Genome-wide association mapping for wood characteristics in Populus identifies an array of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms. New Phytologist 200(3): 710-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12422Search in Google Scholar

72Resende MDV (2016) Software Selegen-REML/BLUP: a useful tool for plant breeding. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 16: 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n4a49Search in Google Scholar

73Rizanti DE, Darmawan W, George B, Merlin A, Dumarcay S, Chapuis H, Gérardin C, Gelhaye E, Raharivelomanana P, Kartika Sari R (2018) Comparison of teak wood properties according to forest management: short versus long rotation. Annals of Forest Science 75(2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0716-8Search in Google Scholar

74Sasidharan S (2021) Teak plantations and wood production. The Teak Genome, Springer: 13-25.Search in Google Scholar

75Shukla S, Viswanath S (2023) Comparison of growth and few wood quality parameters of 24–25-year-old Tectona grandis (teak) trees raised under three agroforestry practices. Agroforestry Systems 97(4): 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00815-5Search in Google Scholar

76VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 91(11): 4414-4423. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0980Search in Google Scholar

77Verhaegen D, Fofana IJ, Logossa ZA, Ofori D (2010) What is the genetic origin of teak (Tectona grandis L.) introduced in Africa and Indonesia? Tree Genetics and Genomes 6(5): 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-010-0286-xSearch in Google Scholar

78Win TT (2021) Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of Teak. The Teak Genome, Springer: 181-190.Search in Google Scholar

79Wu HX (2019) Benefits and risks of using clones in forestry – a review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 34(5): 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1487579Search in Google Scholar

80Younessi-Hamzekhanlu M, Gailing O (2022) Genome-wide SNP markers accelerate perennial forest tree breeding rate for disease resistance through marker-assisted and genome-wide selection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(20): 12315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012315Search in Google Scholar

81Zhao D, Hamilton JP, Bhat WW, Johnson SR, Godden GT, Kinser TJ, Boachon B, Dudareva N, Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2019) A chromosomal-scale genome assembly of Tectona grandis reveals the importance of tandem gene duplication and enables discovery of genes in natural product biosynthetic pathways. Gigascience 8(3): giz005. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz005Search in Google Scholar