1. bookVolumen 67 (2018): Heft 1 (February 2018)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2509-8934
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Feb 2016
Erscheinungsweise
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Asymmetric introgression between Pinus sibirica and Pinus pumila in the Aldan plateau (Eastern Siberia)

Online veröffentlicht: 25 Jul 2018
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 67 (2018) - Heft 1 (February 2018)
Seitenbereich: 66 - 71
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2509-8934
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Feb 2016
Erscheinungsweise
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Abstract

Pinus sibirica and P. pumila are Asian five-needle pines with vast geographic distributions that are partially overlapping. Natural hybrids with intermediate morphology have been found previ­ously, but there is a lack of evidence of ongoing introgression. The goal of our study was to elucidate the genetic structure of P. sibirica and P. pumila populations growing in the north-east of their sympatry zone (Aldan plateau) using cytoplasmic DNA markers. All studied P. sibirica and P. pumila trees had usual spe­cies-specific growth habits. Using nad1 intron2 of mitochond­rial DNA (mtDNA) and trnV of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) we found that trees morphologically identified as P. sibirica had pumila-specific mtDNA. Moreover, some of them also had pumila-specific cpDNA. P. pumila trees were typical and had pumila-type cytoplasmic DNA markers. These results suggest that interspecific hybridization took place long ago and lead to introgression and cryptic hybrids with P. sibirica appearance and P. pumila mtDNA

Anderson E (1953) Introgressive hybridization. Biol Rev 28(3): 280-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1953.tb01379.x10.1111/j.1469-185x.1953.tb01379.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Bobrov EG (1944) On the features of the flora of the erratic region (one of the ways of forming). Sovetskaja botanika 2: 3-20 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Bobrov EG (1961) Introgressive hybridization in the flora of the Baikalian Siberia. Botanical Journal 46(3): 313-327 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Burgess KS, M Morgan, L Deverno and BC Husband (2005) Asymmetrical intro gression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abun dance. Mol Ecol 14: 3471-3483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365294X.2005.02670.x10.1111/j.1365294X.2005.02670.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Chen J, CG Tauer, G Bai, Y Huang, ME Payton and AG Holley (2004) Bidirectional introgression between Pinus taeda and Pinus echinata: evidence from mor­phological and molecular data. Can J For Res 34: 2508-2516. https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-13410.1139/X04-134DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Demesure B, Sodzi M, Petit RJ (1995) A set of universals primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 4: 129-131.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00201.x10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00201.x7711952DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Doyle JJ and JL Doyle (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quanti ties of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11-15.Search in Google Scholar

Gernandt DS, GG Lopez, SO Garcia and A Liston (2005) Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon 54(1): 29-42.https://doi.org/10.2307/2506530010.2307/25065300DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Godbout J, FC Yeh and J Bousquet (2012) Large-scale asymmetric introgression of cytoplasmic DNA reveals Holocene range displacement in a North Amer­ican boreal pine complex. Ecol Evol 2(8): 1853-1866. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.29410.1002/ece3.294343399022957188DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Goroshkevich SN (1999) On the possibility of natural hybridization between Pi­nus sibirica and Pinus pumila (Pinaceae) in the Baikal region. Botanical Jour­nal. 84(9): 48-57 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Goroshkevich SN (2004) Natural hybridization between Russian stone pine (Pi­nus sibirica) and Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila). In: Sniezko RA et al. (ed) Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adapt­ability, and pest resistance. pp. 169-171Search in Google Scholar

Goroshkevich SN, AG Popov and GV Vasilieva (2008) Ecological and morphologi­cal studies in the hybrid zone between Pinus sibirica and Pinus pumila. Ann For Res 51: 43-52. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 563 pp ISBN 0231051131Search in Google Scholar

Gugerli F, J Senn, M Anzidei, A Madaghiele, U Büchler, C Sperisen and JJ Vendr­amin (2001) Chloroplast microsatellites and mitochondrial nad1 intron 2 se­quences indicate congruent phylogenetic relationships among Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra), Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica), and Siberian dwarf pine (Pinus pumila). Mol Ecol 10: 1489-1497. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01285.x10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01285.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hao ZZ, YY Liu, M Nazaire, XX Wei and XQ Wang (2015) Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of sect. Quinquefoliae (Pinus): implications for Northern Hemisphere biogeography. Mol Phylogenet Evol 87: 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.01310.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.01325800283DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Ito M, Y Suyama, TA Ohsawa and Y Watano (2008) Airborne-pollen pool and mating pattern in a hybrid zone between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla. Mol Ecol 17:5092-5103.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03966.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03966.x19120991DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Koropachinskiy IYu and LI Milyutin (2006) Natural hybridization of woody plants. Novosibirsk, Academic Publishing House “Geo”, 223 pp. ISBN 5-9747-0034-1 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Kupriyanova LA and MV Litvintseva (1974) The group Cembrae of genus Pinus, its volume and relationships according to palynological data. Botanical Journal 59(5): 630-644 (In Russian). Mogensen HL (1996) The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants. Am J Bot 83:383 404. https://doi.org/10.2307/244617210.2307/2446172DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Morita Y, K Ueda, H Kataoka, N Miyoshi (1999) The size-frequency of Japanese Pi­nus pollen. The Bulletin of Research Institute of Natural Sciences Okayama University of Science 25:73-86.Search in Google Scholar

Neale DB and RR Sederoff (1989) Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA and maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in loblolly pine. Theoret Appl Genetics 77(2): 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0026618910.1007/BF0026618924232531DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Petit RJ, C Bodenes, A Ducousso, G Roussel and A Kremer (2004) Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol 161: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Petit RJ and GG Vendramin (2007) Phylogeography of organelle DNA in plants: an introduction. In: Weiss S, Ferrand N (eds) Phylogeography of Southern European Refugia. New York, USA: Springer, pp 23-97. ISBN 978-1-4020- 4904-0Search in Google Scholar

Petrova EA, SN Goroshkevich, MM Belokon, YS Belokon and DV Politov (2008) Population genetic structure and mating system in the hybrid zone be­tween Pinus sibirica Du Tour and P. pumila (Pall.) Regel at the eastern Baikal Lake shore. Ann For Res 51: 19-30.Search in Google Scholar

Petrova EA, SN Goroshkevich, DV Politov, MM Belokon, AG Popov and GV Vasily­eva (2007) Seed production and genetic structure of populations in natural hybrid zone of Siberian stone pine and Siberian dwarf pine. Khvoynyye bo­realnoy zony 24: 329-335 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Politov DV, MM Belokon, OP Maluchenko, YS Belokon, VN Molozhnikov, LE Me­jnartowicz and KV Krutovsky (1999) Genetic evidence of natural hybridiza­tion between Pinus sibirica Du Tour and P. pumila (Pall.) Regel. Forest Genet­ics 6: 41-48.Search in Google Scholar

Pozdnyakov LK (1969) Forests in the Yakutskaya ASSR. In: Forest of USSR. Vol. 4. Moscow, Nauka, pp 469-537 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Senjo M, K Kimura, Y Watano, K Ueda and T Shimizu (1999) Extensive mitochon­drial introgression from Pinus pumila to P. parviflora var. pentaphylla (Pina­ceae). J Plant Res 112: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL0001386710.1007/PL00013867DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Stebbins GL Jr (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc Am Phil Soc 103: 231-251.Search in Google Scholar

Syring J, K Farrell, R Businsky, R Cronn and A Liston (2007) Widespread genealog­ical nonmonophyin species of Pinus Subgenus Strobus. Syst Biol 5 (2): 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1063515070125878710.1080/1063515070125878717454973DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Thórsson AT, E Salmela and K Anamthawat-Jónsson (2001) Morphological, cyto­genetic, and molecular evidence for introgressive hybridization in birch. J Hered 92(5): 404-408. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/92.5.40410.1093/jhered/92.5.40411773247DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Tsutsui K, A Suwa, K Sawada, T Kato, TA Ohsawa and Y Watano (2009 Incongru­ence among mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear gene trees in Pinus subgenus Strobus (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 122: 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-009-0246-410.1007/s10265-009-0246-419529882DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Vasilyeva GV and SN Goroshkevich (2013) Crossability of Pinus sibirica and P. pumila with their hybrids. Silvae Genetica 62(1-2):61-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2013-000810.1515/sg-2013-0008DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Vasilyeva GV (2014) Seed efficiency of hybrids between Siberian stone pine and Siberian dwarf pine from northern slope of Khamar-Daban ridge. Moscow state forest university bulletin. Lesnoj Vestnik 1: 85-90 (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Vasilyeva GV, EA Zhuk and AG Popov (2010) Flowering phenology of the Siberi­an stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour), Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila (Pall.) Regel) and their hybrids. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology 1(9): 61-67 (In Russian, English summary)Search in Google Scholar

Wang B and Wang XR (2014) Mitochondrial DNA capture and divergence in Pi­nus provide new insights into the evolution of the genus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 80: 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.07.01410.1016/j.ympev.2014.07.01425106134DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Watano Y, M Imazu and T Shimizu (1995) Chloroplast DNA typing by PCR-SSCP in the Pinus pumila-P. parviflora var. pentaphylla complex (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 108: 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0234423910.1007/BF02344239DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Watano Y, M Imazu and T Shimizu (1996) Spatial distribution of cpDNA and mtD­NA haplotypes in a hybrid zone between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla (Pinaceae). J Plant Res 109: 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0234455510.1007/BF02344555DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo