Fostering diffusion of scientific contents of National Society Cardiovascular Journals: the new ESC search engine

[1] Alfonso F, Ambrosio G, Pinto FJ et al. European National Society cardiovascular journals. Background, rationale and mission statement of the “Editors’ Club” (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology). Heart 2008; 94:e19.10.1136/hrt.2008.14486518480341Search in Google Scholar

[2] Alfonso F, Ambrosio G, Pinto FJ et al. Editors’ Network ESC Task Force. European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals: the ‘editors’ network’. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:26-8.10.1093/eurheartj/ehp46219952007Search in Google Scholar

[3] Alfonso F, Timmis A, Pinto FJ et al. Editors’ Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force. Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals.Eur Heart J 2012; 33:587-94.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr46422383145Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mills P, Timmis A, Huber K et al. The role of European national journals in education. Heart 2009; 95:e3.10.1136/hrt.2009.18633819946003Search in Google Scholar

[5] Timmis AD, Alfonso F, Ambrosio G et al. Editors’ Network.National society cardiovascular journals of Europe: Almanac 2011. Heart 2011; 97:1819.10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301089319944522016399Search in Google Scholar

[6] Alfonso F, Bermejo J, Segovia J. Impactology, impactitis, impactotherapy. Rev Esp Cardiol 2005; 58:1239-45.10.1157/13079921Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bjork B-C, Welling P, Laakso M et al. Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e11273.10.1371/journal.pone.0011273289057220585653Search in Google Scholar

[8] Van Aalst J. Using Google Scholar to estimate the impact of journal articles in education. Educational Researcher 2010; 39:387-400.10.3102/0013189X10371120Search in Google Scholar

[9] Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008; 22:338-42.10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF17884971Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 2009; 302:1092-6.10.1001/jama.2009.130719738094Search in Google Scholar

[11] Alfonso F. The long pilgrimage of Spanish biomedical journals toward excellence. Who helps? Quality, impact and research merit. Endocrinol Nutr 2010; 57:110-20.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.Science 1968; 159:56-63.10.1126/science.159.3810.56Search in Google Scholar

[13] Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L. Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 2006; 57:1060-72.14.10.1002/asi.20373Search in Google Scholar

[14] Perneger TV. Relation between online ‘hit counts’ and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. BMJ 2004; 329:546-7.10.1136/bmj.329.7465.54651610515345629Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wren JD. URL decay in MEDLINE: a 4-year follow-up study. Bioinformatics 2008; 24:1381-5.10.1093/bioinformatics/btn12718413326Search in Google Scholar

[16] Butler D. Web usage data outline map of knowledge. Nature 2009; 458:135.10.1038/458135a19279596Search in Google Scholar

[17] Citrome L, Moss SV, Graf C. How to search and harvest the medical literature: let the citations come to you, and how to proceed when they do. Int J Clin Pract 2009; 63:1565-70.10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02164.x19747238Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hrynaszkiewicz I, Norton ML, Vickers AJ et al. Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors and peer reviwers. BMJ 2010; 340:c181.10.1136/bmj.c181281342720110312Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ross JS, Lehman R, Gross CP. The importance of clinical trial data sharing. Towards more open science. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5:238-40.10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965798331898322438465Search in Google Scholar

[20] Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:e308.10.1371/journal.pone.0000308181775217375194Search in Google Scholar

[21] Santoro E, Caldarola P, Villella A. Using Web 2.0 technologies and social media for the cardiologist’s education and update. G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 2011; 12:174-81.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chatterjee P, Biswas T. Blogs and Twitter in medical publications: too unreliable to quote, or a change waiting to happen? S AfrMed J 2011; 101:712, 714.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Chan XH, Wynn-Jones W. Time for open access secure online data collection tool. BMJ 2012; 11:49.10.1136/bmj.e480522802407Search in Google Scholar

[24] Masic I, Sivic S, Pandza H. Social Networks in medical education in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mater Sociomed 2012; 24:162-4.10.5455/msm.2012.24.162-164Search in Google Scholar

[25] Nallamothu BK, Lüscher TF. Moving from impact to influence: measurement and the changing role of medical journals. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:2892-6.10.1093/eurheartj/ehs308Search in Google Scholar

[26] Heras M, Avanzas P, Bayes-Genis A et al. 2011 Annual summary. Another meeting with our readers. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64:1207-14.10.1016/j.recesp.2011.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[27] Meneghini R, Packer AL. Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication. EMBO Rep 2007; 8:112-16.10.1038/sj.embor.7400906Search in Google Scholar

[28] Carroll MW. Why full open access matters. PLoS Biol 2011; 9:e101210.10.1371/journal.pbio.1001210Search in Google Scholar

[29] Bjork BC. A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13:e115.10.2196/jmir.1802Search in Google Scholar

[30] Alfonso F, Almonte K, Arai K et al. Ibero-American cardiovascular journals. Proposals for a much-needed cooperation.Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62:1060-7.10.1016/S0300-8932(09)72106-2Search in Google Scholar

[31] Suber P. Ensuring open access for publicly funded research.BMJ 2012; 345:e5184.10.1136/bmj.e5184341443222875953Search in Google Scholar

[32] Whitfield J. Open access comes of age. Nature 2011; 474:428.10.1038/474428a21697919Search in Google Scholar

[33] Eysenbach G. Citation advantage of open access articles.PLoS Biol 2006; 4:e157.10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157145924716683865Search in Google Scholar

[34] Norris M, Oppenheim C, Rowland F. The citation advantage of open-access articles. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 2008; 59:1963-72.10.1002/asi.20898Search in Google Scholar

[35] Evans JE, Reimer J. Open access and global participation in science. Science 2009; 323:1025.10.1126/science.115456219229029Search in Google Scholar

[36] Mueller PS, Murali NS, Cha SS et al. The effect of online status on the impact factors of general internal medicine journals. Neth J Med 2006; 64:39-44.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Murali NS, Murali HR, Auethavekiat P et al. Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79:1001-6.10.4065/79.8.100115301326Search in Google Scholar

[38] Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V et al. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e13636.10.1371/journal.pone.0013636295667820976155Search in Google Scholar

[39] Davis PM. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing.FASEB J 2011; 25:2129-34.10.1096/fj.11-18398821450907Search in Google Scholar

[40] Crum JA. An availability study of electronic articles in an academic health sciences library. J Med Libr Assoc 2011; 99:290-6.10.3163/1536-5050.99.4.006319337122025906Search in Google Scholar

[41] Manikandan S, Vani NI. Restricting access to publications from funded research: ethical issues and solutions. J Postgrad Med 2010; 56:154-6.10.4103/0022-3859.6528620622399Search in Google Scholar

[42] Hawkes N. UK government comes down in favor of making all publicly funded research “open access”. BMJ 2012; 345:e4878.10.1136/bmj.e487822807164Search in Google Scholar

[43] Noorden RV. Europe joins UK open-access bid. Britain plans to dip in to research funding to pay for results to be freely available. Nature 2012; 487:285.Search in Google Scholar

[44] http://www.escardio.org/about/corporate-news/Pages/Search-the-ESC.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

[45] http://www.escardio.org/about/welcome/Pages/Search-the-ESC.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

[46] ESC Web activity report Oct 2012 to Nov 2012. http://snack.to/fukiqkmc Search in Google Scholar