<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Street names are mundane spatial markers that besides providing a sense of orientation inscribe onto the landscape the ideological ethos and political symbols of hegemonic discourses. This review article takes stock of the existing scholarship done on the politics of street naming practices in human (political, cultural, and social) geography and rethinks these insights from sociological perspectives. Drawing on Randall Collins’ taxonomy of sociological theory, the paper interprets urban street nomenclatures along functionalist, conflictualist, constructionist, and utilitarian lines. The analysis is delivered in two installments: Part I addresses urban nomenclatures from functionalist and conflictualist perspectives, while Part II (published in the next issue of this journal) approaches street names as social constructions and examines their utilitarian value. In doing so, the paper advances the argument that urban namescapes in general and street names in particular should make an important object of sociological reflection and empirical analysis. It is one of the key arguments developed in this paper that toponymy encapsulates broader and intersecting issues of power, memory, identity, language, and space which can be rendered visible through sociological analysis.</p></abstract>

Street names are mundane spatial markers that besides providing a sense of orientation inscribe onto the landscape the ideological ethos and political symbols of hegemonic discourses. This review article takes stock of the existing scholarship done on the politics of street naming practices in human (political, cultural, and social) geography and rethinks these insights from sociological perspectives. Drawing on Randall Collins’ taxonomy of sociological theory, the paper interprets urban street nomenclatures along functionalist, conflictualist, constructionist, and utilitarian lines. The analysis is delivered in two installments: Part I addresses urban nomenclatures from functionalist and conflictualist perspectives, while Part II (published in the next issue of this journal) approaches street names as social constructions and examines their utilitarian value. In doing so, the paper advances the argument that urban namescapes in general and street names in particular should make an important object of sociological reflection and empirical analysis. It is one of the key arguments developed in this paper that toponymy encapsulates broader and intersecting issues of power, memory, identity, language, and space which can be rendered visible through sociological analysis.

Street Names through Sociological Lenses. Part I: Functionalism and Conflict Theory

Department of Social Work, Journalism, Public Relations, and Sociology

Social Change Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Street names are mundane spatial markers that besides providing a sense of orientation inscribe onto the landscape the ideological ethos and political symbols...

Street Names through Sociological Lenses. Part I: Functionalism and Conflict Theory

Online veröffentlicht: 01. März 2021

Seitenbereich: 144 - 176

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2020-0001

Schlüsselwörter
Sociology of street names, Politics of memory, Political toponymy, Social theory, Political geography

© 2020 Mihai Stelian Rusu, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Street Names through Sociological Lenses. Part I: Functionalism and Conflict Theory

Online veröffentlicht: 01. März 2021

Seitenbereich: 144 - 176

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2020-0001

SchlüsselwörterSociology of street names, Politics of memory, Political toponymy, Social theory, Political geography

© 2020 Mihai Stelian Rusu, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
Sociology of street names, Politics of memory, Political toponymy, Social theory, Political geography