[
[1] Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., Wardoyo, R. “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM)”, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. “A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method”, Materials and Design, 31, pp. 1785–1789, 2010, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[3] Trung, D. D. “Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Milling Process”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 71(2), pp. 69 – 84, 2021. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2021-0019
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[4] Mehdi, K. G., Edmundas, K. Z., Zenonas, T., Jurgita, A. “A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making”, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3), pp. 25 – 44, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G. -H. “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS”, European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2), pp. 445 – 455, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[6] Dragan, P., Goran, C. “The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)”, Expert Systems with Applications 42, pp. 3016 – 3028, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[7] Morteza, Y., Pascale, Z., Edmundas, K. Z., Zenonas, T. “A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems”, Management Decision 57(9), pp. 2501 – 2519, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[8] Pamuca, D. S., Tarle, S. P., Parezanovi, T. “New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL -MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 31(1), pp. 1641 – 1665, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1506706
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[9] Yakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F. “Multi-attribute Decision Making: Dominance with Respect to an Importance Order of the Attributes”, Applied mathematics and computation 54(2), pp. 167 – 181, 1993, DOI: 10.1016/0096-3003(93)90057-L
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[10] Sameera, M., Muzakkir, S. M. “A New Multi-Criterion Decision Making (MCDM) Method Based on Proximity Indexed Value for Minimizing Rank Reversals”, Computers & Industrial Engineering 2018, 1 – 39, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.045
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[11] Hwang, C. –L., Lai, Y. –J., Liu, T. Y. “A new approach for multiple objective decision making”, Computers & Operations Research 20(8), pp. 889 – 899, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[12] Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, “Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study”, Springer – Science + Busines media, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Zhi, W., Huchang, L., Edmundas Kazimieras, Z. “MACONT: Mixed Aggregation by Comprehensive Normalization Technique for Multi-Criteria Analysis”, Informatica 31(4), pp. 857 – 880, 2020. DOI: 10.15388/20-INFOR417
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[14] Ardil, C. “Aircraft Selection Process Using Preference Analysis for Reference Ideal Solution (PARIS)”, International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 14(3), pp. 80 – 90, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Aytekin, A. “Comparative Analysis of the Normalization Techniques in the Context of MCDM Problems”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering 4(2), pp. 1 – 27, 2021. DOI: 10.31181/dmame210402001a
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[16] Aytekin, A. “The distances and references based solution approach for multi-criteria decision problems”, PhD thesis, Anadolu University, Graduatc School of Social Sciences, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Radojko, L. “Application of MABAC Method in Evaluation of Sector Efficiency in Serbia”, Review of International Comparative Management 22(3), pp. 400 – 418, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Merita, B., Darko, B., Aleksandar, M. “Multicriteria decision-making related to flood protection of Arilje city”, 7th International scientific professional conference security and crisis management – theory and practice – safety for the future, Serbia, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Ankur, C., Suresh, K. J., Sachin, K. M. “Socio-technological framework for selecting suppliers of pharmaceuticals in a pandemic environment”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), 2022. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-02-2021-0081
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[20] Zeljko, S., Dragan, P., Edmundas, K. Z., Goran, C., Olegas, P. “The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods”, Symmetry 9(11), pp. 1 – 25, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/sym9110264
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[21] Pijush, K. D. P., Sanjib, B., Saurabh, P., Dragan, M., Prasenjit, C. “A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Resource Selection in Mobile Crowd Computing”, Symmetry 13(9), pp. 1 – 51, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/sym13091713
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[22] Kajal, C., Edmundas, K. Z., Jolanta, T., Krishnendu, A., Samarjit, K. “A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects”, Symmetry 10(2), pp. 1-28, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/sym10020046
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[23] Milan, M., Marko, B., Goran, T. “Selection of the railroad container terminal in Serbia based on multi criteria decision making methods”, Decision Making: Applicatons in Management and Engineering, 1(2), pp. 1 – 15, 2018. DOI: 10.31181/dmame1802001m
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[24] Ayse, T. “Financial performance analysis of electricity generation companies with multi-criteria decision making: Entropy-based Cocoso method”, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal 9(2), pp.532–546, 2021. DOI: 10.15295/bmij.v9i2.1794
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[25] Alptekin, U., Figen, B., Lutfu, S., Darjan, K., Dragisa, S., Gabrijela, P. “Selection of insulation materials with PSI-CRITIC based CoCoSo method”, Journal of Construction 20(2), pp. 382 – 392, 2021. DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.20.2.382
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[26] Erfan, B. T., Ali, E. T. “A Cluster-based Stratified Hybrid Decision Support Model under Uncertainty: Sustainable Healthcare Landfill Location Selection”, Applied Intelligence 2022, 1 – 10, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03335-4889866035280110
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[27] Zhi, W., Huchang, L., Audrius, B., Zenonas, T. “A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 25(8), pp. 858–874, 2019. DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2019.11309
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[28] Haihui, H. “Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with critic for financial risk evaluation”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 26(4), pp. 695 – 724, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/tede.2020.11920
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[29] Gabrijela, P., Pavle, R., Dragisa, S., Darjan, K. “A new hybrid fuzzy PSI-Piprecia-Cocoso MCDM based approach to solving the transportation company selection problem”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 27(5), pp. 1227 – 1249, 2021. DOI: 10.3846/tede.2021.15058
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[30] Esra, A. “An analysis on turkey’s merger and acquisition activities: MAIRCA method”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi 12(1), pp. 1 – 11, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[31] Sema, K. K. “Evaluation of the Effect of COVID-19 on Countries’ Sustainable Development Level: A comparative MCDM framework”, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications 3(3), pp. 101 – 122, 2020. DOI: 10.31181/oresta20303101k
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[32] Sarfaraz, H. Z., Fatih, E., Dragan, P., Saulius, R. “Neighborhood selection for a newcomer via a novel BWM-based revised MAIRCA integrated model: a case from the Coquimbo-La Serena conurbation, Chile”, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 24(2), pp. 102 – 118, 2020. DOI: 10.3846/ijspm.2020.11543
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[33] Huu-Quang, N., Van-Tung, N., Dang-Phong, P., Quoc-Hoang, T., Ngoc-Pi, V. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the PMEDM Process by Using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA Methods”, Applied sciences 12(8), pp. 1 – 11, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/app12083720
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[34] Trung, D. D., Thinh, H. X. “A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study”, Advances in Production Engineering & Management 16(4), pp. 443 – 456, 2021. DOI: 10.14743/apem2021.4.412
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[35] Trung, D, D. “A combination method for multi-criteria decision making problem in turning process”, Manufacturing review 8(26), pp. 1 – 17, 2021. DOI: 10.1051/mfreview/2021024
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[36] Thien, N. V, Dung, H. T., Trung, D. D., Nhu-Tung, N. “Multi-objective optimization of turning process using a combination of Taguchi and VIKOR methods”, Journal of Applied Engineering Science 19(4), pp. 868 – 873, 2021. DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-29654
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[37] Shankar, C., Prasenjit, C. “Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data”, Decision Science Letters 2, pp. 135 – 148, 2013. DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2013.03.005
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[38] Aysegul, T. I., Esra, A. A. “The Decision-Making Approach Based on the Combination of Entropy and Rov Methods for the Apple Selection Problem”, European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 3(3), pp. 80 – 86, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] Naveen, J., Gyanendrakumar, S., Singh, A. R. “An integrated MCDM methodology for green supplier selection in GSCM”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 118(20), pp. 461 – 467, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[40] Josy, G., Francis Xavier, J. “A Hybrid MCDM Model Combining Entropy Weight Method with Range of Value (ROV) Method and Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) Method for Supplier Selection in Supply Chain Management”, Operations Management and Data Analytics Modelling, CRC Press, 2021. DOI: 10.1201/9781003181644
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[41] Milos, M., Miroslav, R., Miodrag, M. “Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids”, Decision Science Letters 5, pp. 245 – 254, 2016. DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.12.001
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[42] Saif, W., Sedat, B., Nasir Bashir, M., Shafi, A. “Selection of sustainable material for the manufacturing of complex automotive products using a new hybrid Goal Programming Model for Best Worst Method–Proximity Indexed Value method”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 0(0), pp. 1 – 15, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1464420720966347
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[43] K. L., Srinivas, K. “Sensitive Analysis on Selection of Piston Material Using MADM Techniques”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 69(4), pp. 45 – 56, 2019. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2019-0042
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[44] Einhorn, H. J., McCoach, W. “A Symble Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation”, Behavioral Scicence 22(4), pp. 270 – 282, 1997. DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830220405
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[45] Trung, D. D., Nhu-Tung, N., Duc, D. V. “Study on multi-objective optimization of the turning process of EN 10503 steel by combination of Taguchi method and Moora technique”, EUREKA: Physics and Engineering 2021(2), pp. 52 – 65, 2021. DOI: 10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001414
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[46] Trung, D. D. “Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes”, Manufacturing Review 9(3), pp. 1 – 13, 2022. DOI: 10.1051/mfreview/2022003
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
[47] Enrique, B., Perez-Gladish, B., Garcia-Bernabeu, A. “A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach”, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, Cham, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[48] Mehdi, K. G., Edmundas, K. Z., Zenonas, T., Jurgita, A. “A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making”, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 50(3), pp. 25 – 44, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
