<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The ranking of solutions to determine the best one among many solutions is always the setting goal for all activities of all fields in general and in the turning process in particular. When a solution is evaluated by multiple criteria, this is known as “Multi-Criteria Decision Making - MCDM”. Many MCDM methods were proposed by scientists, however, the ranked results of the solutions are not the same. In addition, the ranked results of the solutions also depend on the weighting methods of the criteria. In this study, the ranking of the solutions in the hole turning process was performed by different MCDM methods and with different weighting methods. Five MCDM methods were mentioned in this study including COCOSO, MABAC, MAIRCA, EAMR, and TOPSIS. In this study, five weighting methods were also used including MEREC weight, EQUAl weight, ROC weight, RS weight, and FUCOM weight. The combination of MCDM and weighting methods creates twenty-five ranking results of the solutions. It is interesting to note that all twenty-five ranking results determine the same best solution. The stability in ranking the solutions by MCDM methods was also discussed in this study. From the obtained results, several recommendations were drawn. Some issues that have not been solved in this study and need to be done in near future are also mentioned in the last section of this study.</p>
</abstract>

The ranking of solutions to determine the best one among many solutions is always the setting goal for all activities of all fields in general and in the turning process in particular. When a solution is evaluated by multiple criteria, this is known as “Multi-Criteria Decision Making - MCDM”. Many MCDM methods were proposed by scientists, however, the ranked results of the solutions are not the same. In addition, the ranked results of the solutions also depend on the weighting methods of the criteria. In this study, the ranking of the solutions in the hole turning process was performed by different MCDM methods and with different weighting methods. Five MCDM methods were mentioned in this study including COCOSO, MABAC, MAIRCA, EAMR, and TOPSIS. In this study, five weighting methods were also used including MEREC weight, EQUAl weight, ROC weight, RS weight, and FUCOM weight. The combination of MCDM and weighting methods creates twenty-five ranking results of the solutions. It is interesting to note that all twenty-five ranking results determine the same best solution. The stability in ranking the solutions by MCDM methods was also discussed in this study. From the obtained results, several recommendations were drawn. Some issues that have not been solved in this study and need to be done in near future are also mentioned in the last section of this study.

Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process

Strojnícky časopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The ranking of solutions to determine the best one among many solutions is always the setting goal for all activities of all fields in general and in the...

Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process

Online veröffentlicht: 07. Nov. 2022

Seitenbereich: 15 - 40

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2022-0014

Schlüsselwörter
MCDM, COCOSO, MABAC, MAIRCA, EAMR, TOPSIS, FUCOM, Hole turning

© 2022 Do Duc Trung et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Applying Cocoso, Mabac, Mairca, Eamr, Topsis and Weight Determination Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Hole Turning Process

Online veröffentlicht: 07. Nov. 2022

Seitenbereich: 15 - 40

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2022-0014

SchlüsselwörterMCDM, COCOSO, MABAC, MAIRCA, EAMR, TOPSIS, FUCOM, Hole turning

© 2022 Do Duc Trung et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
MCDM, COCOSO, MABAC, MAIRCA, EAMR, TOPSIS, FUCOM, Hole turning