Moderation by Researchgate Related to Comments on “Predatory” Publishing Practices

BOUTRON, I., RAVAUD, P. (2018) Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115(11): 2613-2619. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.171075511510.1073/pnas.1710755115DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

COPIELLO, S. (2019) Research Interest: another undisclosed (and redundant) algorithm by ResearchGate. Scientometrics (in press). DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03124-w10.1007/s11192-019-03124-wDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

COPIELLO, S., BONIFACI, P. (2019) ResearchGate Score, full-text research items, and full-text reads: a follow-up study. Scientometrics 119: 1255–1262. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03063-610.1007/s11192-019-03063-6DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

FIHN, S.D. (2019). Combating misrepresentation of research findings. JAMA Network Open 2(5): e192553-e192553. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.255310.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2553Search in Google Scholar

KHAN, M.S., LATEEF, N., SIDDIQI, T.J., REHMAN, K.A., ALNAIMAT, S., KHAN, S.U., RIAZ, H., MURAD, H., MANDROLA, J., DOUKKY, R., KRASUSKI, R.A. (2019) Level and prevalence of spin in published cardiovascular randomized clinical trial reports with statistically nonsignificant primary outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Network Open 2(5): e192622-e192622. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.262210.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2622Search in Google Scholar

PYNE, D. (2017) The rewards of predatory publishing at a small business school. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 48(3): 137-160. DOI: 10.3138/jsp.48.3.13710.3138/jsp.48.3.137DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A. (2017) ResearchGate projects: unregulated academic social media. Social Communication 1(15): 6-13. DOI: 10.1515/sc-2017-000110.1515/sc-2017-0001DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A., DOBRÁNSZKI, J. (2018) Editors moving forward: stick to academic basics, maximize transparency and respect, and enforce the rules. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 109(5): 263-266. DOI: 10.1701/2902.2924410.1701/2902.29244DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A., & TSIGARIS, P. (2018a) What value do whitelists and blacklists have in academia? The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(6): 781-792. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.01710.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.017DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A, & TSIGARIS, P. (2018b). Academics must list all publications on their CV. KOME 6(1): 94-99. DOI: 10.17646/KOME.2018.1610.17646/KOME.2018.16DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A, & TSIGARIS, P. (2019). How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society (in press) DOI: 10.1108/JICES-06-2018-005910.1108/JICES-06-2018-0059DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TSIGARIS, P. (2019). Letter to the editors. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 50(2): 139–142. DOI: 10.3138/jsp.50.2.0510.3138/jsp.50.2.05DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TSIGARIS, P., TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A. (2019) Did the research faculty at a small Canadian business school publish in “predatory” venues? This depends on the publishing blacklist. Publications 7: 35. DOI: 10.3390/publications702003510.3390/publications7020035DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

TURRENTINE, M. (2017) It’s all how you “spin” it: interpretive bias in research findings in the obstetrics and gynecology literature. Obstetrics & Gynecology 129(2): 239-242.10.1097/AOG.0000000000001818Search in Google Scholar