Conventional Theory’s Relevance: Evidence from Japan

Balassa, B., 1986, Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 315-31910.2307/1925512Search in Google Scholar

Bernhofen, D.M., Brown, J.C., Masuyaki, T., 2012, A direct test of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem: the natural experiment of Japan, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2d6f/ab88f27fc8a53669d735145b70297f2fefba.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Harrigan J., 2003, Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?’, in Handbook of International Trade, Blackwell Publishing Co., p.87Search in Google Scholar

Hufbauer, G.C., 1970, The Impact of National Characteristics & Technology on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactured Goods, in The Technology Factor in International Trade, R. Vernon (ed.) NBER, pp.146-231Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R.W., 1971, A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade, and History, in Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, J. Bhagwati, ed., North-Holland Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Lancaster, K., 1969, The Heckscher-Ohlin Model: A Geometric Treatment in J. Bhagwati ed., International Trade: Selected Readings, Baltimore Penguin, 1969Search in Google Scholar

Leontief, W.W., 1956, Factor Proportions and the Structure of American Trade: Further Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 386-40710.2307/1926500Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Markusen, J.R., Melvin, J.R., Kaempfer, W.H., Maskus, K.E., 1995, International Trade, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Minhas, B.S., 1962, The Homohypallagic Production Function, Factor-Intensity Reversals, and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 138-39, 143-4410.1086/258610Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stolper, W. F., Samuelson, P.A., 1941, Protection and Real Wages, The Review of Economic Studies 9/1, pp. 58-7310.2307/2967638Open DOISearch in Google Scholar