Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Can We Fully Comprehend the Intricacies of the Physical World? Some Reflections on the Boundaries of Scientific Knowledge from a Historical Perspective


Zitieren

Agar, J. (2012). Science in the twentieth century and beyond. Cambridge [UK] & Malden, MA: Polity Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-745-63469-2. Search in Google Scholar

Agutter, p. S. & D. N. Wheatley (2008). Thinking about life. The history and philosophy of biology and other sciences. Berlin [etc.]: Springer. ISBN 13: 978-1-402-08865-0. Search in Google Scholar

Bacon, F. (1620). Novum organum scientiarum. London: Joannem Billium [English translation: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (etc.), 2000. ISBN 13: 978-0-521-56483-0]. Search in Google Scholar

Barrow, J. D. (1998). Impossibility. The limits of science and the science of limits. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-195-13082-9. Search in Google Scholar

Becquerel, H. (1896). Sur les radiations émises par phosphorescence/Sur les radiations invisibles émises par les corps phosphorescents. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences 122: 420–421 & 501–502. https://www.academie-sciences.fr/pdf/dossiers/Becquerel/Becquerel_pdf/CR1896_p420.pdf & https://www.academie-sciences.fr/pdf/dossiers/Becquerel/Becquerel_pdf/CR1896_p501.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Bernal, J. D. (1954). Science in history. Vol. 1. New York: Cameron Associates. ISBN N/A. Search in Google Scholar

Bernard, C. (1865). Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris [etc.]: J. B. Baillière et Fils. https://archive.org/download/BIUSante_31054/BIUS-ante_31054.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific research. Strategy and philosophy. Two vols. Heidelberg, Berlin & New York: Springer. ISBN N/A. Search in Google Scholar

Cela-Conde, C. J., G. Marty, F. Maestú, T. Ortiz, E. Munar, A. Fernández, M. Roca, J. Rosselló & F. Quesney (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 101: 6321–6325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401427101. Search in Google Scholar

Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science 69: 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/342455. Search in Google Scholar

Colman, D. R. (2006). The three princes of Serendip. Notes on a mysterious phenomenon. McGill Journal of Medicine 9: 161–163. https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v9i2.667. Search in Google Scholar

Croce, B. (1908). Estetica come scienza dell’espressione e linguistica generale. Teoria e storia. Third edition. Bari: Giuseppe Laterza & Figli [First edited in 1902 by Remo Sandron, Milano, Palermo & Napoli]. https://archive.org/download/esteticacomesci00crocgoog/esteticacomesci00crocgoog.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. C. (2014). Theoretical foundations for an empirical aesthetics. In (P. p. L. Tinio & J. K. Smith, Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts, pp. 60–85. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207058.005. Search in Google Scholar

Dahm, R. (2005). Friedrich Miescher and the discovery of DNA. Developmental Biology 278: 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.028. Search in Google Scholar

de Visser, S. N., B. p. Freymann & H. Olff (2011). The Serengeti food web: empirical quantification and analysis of topological changes under increasing human impact. Journal of Animal Ecology 80: 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01787.x. Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. New York: Penguin Group. Original edn.: Minton, Balch & Co., New York, 1934. ISBN 13: 978-1-101-66703-3. Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1977). Come si fa una tesi di laurea. Le materie umanistiche, Milano: Bompiani. https://archive.org/download/UmbertoEcoComeSiFaUnaTesiDiLaure/Umberto_Eco-Come_si_fa_una_tesi_di_laure.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Feijoo, B. J. [Feyjoó, B. G.] (1745). Cartas eruditas y curiosas. En que, por la mayor parte, se continúa el designio del Theatro Crítico Universal, impugnando, o reduciendo a dudosas, varias opiniones comunes. Tomo segundo. Madrid: Imprenta de los herederos de Francisco del Hierro [Modern edition: Instituto Feijoo de Estudios del Siglo XVIII – Ayuntamiento de Oviedo – KRK Ediciones, Oviedo, 2018; ISBN 13: 978-84-8367-628-8]. Search in Google Scholar

Feyerabend, p. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books. ISBN 13: 978-0-902-30891-6. Search in Google Scholar

Ford, E. D. (2000). Scientific method for ecological research. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-521-66973-3. Search in Google Scholar

Ginsberg, R. (2004). The aesthetics of ruins. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. ISBN 13: 978-9-042-01672-9. Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, H. E. (1978). Darwin’s “tree of nature” and other images of wide scope. In (J. Wechsler, Ed.) On Aesthetics in science, pp. 121–140. Cambridge, MA & London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-262-23088-9. Search in Google Scholar

Haeckel, E. (1904). Kunstformen der Natur. Leipzig & Vienna: Verlag des Bibliographischen Instituts. https://archive.org/download/kunstformenderna00haec/kunstformenderna00haec.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape. How science can determine human values. New York [etc.]: Free Press. ISBN 13: 978-1-439-17121-9. Search in Google Scholar

Hetzler, F. M. (1988). Causality: ruin time and ruins. Leonardo 21: 51–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578416. Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, R. (1990). Molecular beauty. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48: 191–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/431761. Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, R. (2003). Thoughts on aesthetics and visualization in chemistry. Hyle 9: 7–10. https://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/9-1/hoffmann.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, S. J., F. Dufaud & E. H. Oelkers (2003). An experimental study of illite dissolution kinetics as a function of pH from 1.4 to 12.4 and temperature from 5 to 50°C. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67: 3583–3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00163-7. Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientifíc revolutions. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-226-45811-3. Search in Google Scholar

Laín Entralgo, p. (1970). Ciencia y vida. Madrid: Seminarios y Ediciones. ISBN N/A. Search in Google Scholar

Lan, T., S. Gill, E. Bellemain, R. Bischof, M. A. Nawaz & C. Lindqvist (2017). Evolutionary history of enigmatic bears in the Tibetan Plateau–Himalaya region and the identity of the yeti. Proceedings of the Royal Society – Biological sciences 284: 20171804 (10 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1804. Search in Google Scholar

Margalef, R. (1993). Teoría de los sistemas ecológicos. Barcelona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona. ISBN 13: 978-8-447-50213-4. Search in Google Scholar

Merian, M. S. (1705). Metamorphosis insectorum Surinamensium. Ofte verandering der Surinaamsche insecten. Amsterdam: Voor den Auteur; als ook by Gerard Valck [English translation: Lannoo Publishers, Tielt (Belgium), 2016; ISBN 13: 978-9-401-43378-5]. Search in Google Scholar

Miescher, F. (1871). Ueber die chemische Zusammensetzung der Eiterzellen. Medicinisch-chemische Untersuchungen 4: 441–460. https://archive.org/download/medicinischchemi00hopp/medicinischchemi00hopp.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Monod, J. (1970). Le hasard et la nécessité. Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Paris: Éditions du Seuil [reprint edition: Éditions Points, 2014; ISBN 13: 978-2-757-84448-9]. Search in Google Scholar

Morris, D. (1967). The naked ape. A zoologist’s study of the human animal. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://archive.org/download/the-naked-ape-morris-desmond_202011/Thenakedape-Morris,Desmond.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Mosterín, J. (1987). Conceptos y teorías en la ciencia. Second edition. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. ISBN 13: 978-8-420-62394-8. Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, E. (1952). Some issues in the logic of historical analysis. The Scientific Monthly 74: 162–169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20798. Search in Google Scholar

Pasteur, L. (1848). Mémoire sur la relation qui peut exister entre la forme cristal-line et la composition chimique, et sur la cause de la polarisation rotatoire. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences 26: 535–538. https://www.academie-sciences.fr/archivage_site/fondations/lp_pdf/CR1848_p535.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2005). Are the historical sciences sciences? Skeptical Inquirer 29: 20–21. https://cdn.centerforinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2005/07/22164632/ p20.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. 1908 [1905]. La valeur de la science. Paris: Flammarion. https://archive.org/download/lavaleurdelasci00poingoog/lavaleurdelasci00poingoog.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1934) [impressum 1935]. Logik der Forschung. Zur Erkenntnistheorie der modernen Naturwissenschaft. Vienna: Julius Springer [English translation: Routledge, London & New York, 2002. ISBN 13: 978-0-415-27844-7]. Search in Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN N/A. Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1983). Realism and reason. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-521-24672-9. Search in Google Scholar

Redi, F. (1668). Esperienze intorno alla generazione degl’insetti. Firenze: All’Insegna della Stella. https://archive.org/download/esperienzeintor00redi/esperienzeintor00redi.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, R. M. (1989). Serendipity. Accidental discoveries in science. New York [etc.]: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 13: 978-0-471-60203-3. Search in Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16: 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120118837. Search in Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein, R. [S.] (2003). The art of innovation: polymaths and universality of the creative process. In (L. V. Shavinina, Ed.) The International handbook on innovation, pp. 267–278. Amsterdam & Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50018-8. Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, G. S. (2003). Science, culture and the imagination: enlightenment configurations. In (D. C. Lindberg, R. Porter and R. L. Numbers, Eds.) The Cambridge history of science. Vol. 4, pp. 762–799. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 13: 978-0-521-57243-9. Search in Google Scholar

Siekmann, F., H. Schlör & S. Venghaus (2023). Linking sustainability and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: a monitoring framework accounting for technological development. Energy, Sustainability and Society 13: art. #26 (18 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00405-4. Search in Google Scholar

Stearns, p. N. (2021). The Industrial Revolution in world history. Fifth edition. New York & Abingdon-on-Thames [UK]: Routledge. ISBN 13: 978-0-367-50514-1. van Andel, p. (1994). Anatomy of the unsought finding. Serendipity: origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.2.631. Search in Google Scholar

Windelband, W. (1894). Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Rede zum Antritt des Rectorats der Kaiser-Wilhelms-Universität Strassburg, geh. am 1. Mai 1894. Strassburg: Heitz & Mündel [English translation: Theory & Psychology 8, 5–22, 1998; https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354398081001]. Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, L. & Y. Goyal (2019). Art and science — Intersections of art and science through time and paths forward. EMBO Reports 20: e47061 (6 pp.). https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201847061. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2601-1182
Sprachen:
Englisch, Deutsch, Französisch