The Evaluation of Factors Affecting Bioeconomy Development Using Transdisciplinary Approach

[1] Economic Forum. Insight Report. The Global Risks Report 2019. 14^th Edition. Economic Forum, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Pérez-Suárez R., López-Menéndez A. J. Growing green? Forecasting CO₂ emissions with environmental Kuznets curves and logistic growth models. Environmental Science & Policy 2015:54:428–437. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.01510.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Wu L., Liu S., Liu D., Fang Z., Xu H. Modelling and forecasting CO₂ emissions in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries using a novel multi-variable grey model. Energy 2015:79:489–495. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.05210.1016/j.energy.2014.11.052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019. Highlights. New York, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[5] European Technology Platform. The European Bioeconomy in 2030. Delivering Sustainable Growth by addressing the Grand Societal Challenges, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Commission. A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Latosov E., Volkova A., Siirde A., Thalfeldt M., Kurnitski J. The Impact of Parallel Energy Consumption on the District Heating Networks. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):1–13. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2019-000110.2478/rtuect-2019-0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Ayeronfe F., Kassim A., Hung P., Ishak N., Syarifah S., Aripin A. Production of Ligninolytic Enzymes by Coptotermes curvignathus Gut Bacteria. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):111–121. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2019-000810.2478/rtuect-2019-0008Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bisikirske D., Blumberga D., Vasarevicius S., Skripkiunas G. Multicriteria Analysis of Glass Waste Application. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):152–167. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2019-001110.2478/rtuect-2019-0011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Gulum M., Bilgin A. Measurement and Prediction of Density and Viscosity of Different Diesel-Vegetable Oil Binary Blends. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):214–228.10.2478/rtuect-2019-0014Search in Google Scholar

[11] European Commission. Innovating for Sustainable Growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[12] McCormic K., Kautto N. The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability 2013:5(6):2589–2608. doi:10.3390/su506258910.3390/su5062589Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Griestop L., Colthorpe J., et al. Bioeconomy in everyday life. Berlin: Biocom AG, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lamers P., Searcy E., et al. Developing the global bioeconomy: technical, market, and environmental lessons from bioenergy. Academic Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bioeconomy in Flanders. The vision and strategy of the Government of Flanders for a sustainable and competitive bioeconomy in 2030. Departement Omgeving, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Boger J., et al. Principles for Fostering the Transdisciplinary Development of Assistive Technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2017:12(5):480–490. doi:10.3109/17483107.2016.115195310.3109/17483107.2016.115195327052793Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Carus M., et al. How to shape the next level of the European bio-based economy. The reasons for the delay and the prospects of recovery in Europe. Huerth: Nova-Institut, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Muizniece I., Kubule A., Blumberga D. Towards understanding the transdisciplinary approach of the bioeconomy nexus. Energy Procedia 2018:147:175–180. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.05210.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Petrenko C., Searle S. Assessing the profitability of growing dedicated energy versus food crops in four European countries. The International Council on Clean Transportation. Working paper 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Klein J. T., Habeli R., et al. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Switzerland: Birkhauser Basel, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Mobjork M. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 2010:42(8):866–873.10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003Search in Google Scholar

[22] Klein J. T. Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 2004:36(4):515–526. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.00710.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Klein J. T., et al. Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: an effective way for managing complexity. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Popa F., Guillermin M., Dedeurwaerdere T. A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 2015:65:45–56. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.00210.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Stirling A. Discussion paper on “Transdisciplinary nexus methods”. The Nexus Network. Social, Technological and Environmental Pathways to Sustainability. Sussex: University of Sussex, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Duckett D., Feliciano D., Martin-Ortega J., Munoz-Rojas J. Tackling wicked environmental problems: The discourse and its influence on praxis in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning 2016:154:44–56. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.01510.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Bergendahl J. A., Sarkis J., Timko M. T. Transdisciplinarity and the food energy and water nexus: Ecological modernization and supply chain sustainability perspectives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2018:133:309–319. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.00110.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Zierhofer W., Burger, P. Disentangling transdisciplinarity: an analysis of knowledge integration in problem-oriented research. Science & Technology Studies 2007:20(1):51–74.10.23987/sts.55219Search in Google Scholar

[29] Mobjork M. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 2010:42(8):866–873. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.00310.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003Search in Google Scholar

[30] Hester P. T. An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations research 2013:10(2):56–66.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Jansone Z., Muizniece I., Blumberga D. Analysis of wood bark use opportunities. Energy Procedia 2017:128:268–274. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.07010.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.070Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Kubule A., Indzere Z., Muizniece I. Modelling of the Bioeconomy system using Interpretive structural modelling. Agronomy Research 2019:17(4):1665–1678. doi:10.15159/ar.19.170Search in Google Scholar