Making the most out of proficiency testing participation for a medical laboratory from the standardization point of view

1. Boursier G, Vukasovic I, Brguljan PM, Lohmander M, Ghita I, Andreu FAB, et al. Accreditation process in European countries-an EFLM survey. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2016;54(4):545-51. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-078026744251 DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

2. Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:218:0030:0047:en:PDF#:~:text=This%20Regulation%20provides%20a%20framework,consumers%2C%20protection%20of%20the%20environment Search in Google Scholar

3. Ilac Signatories [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from https://ilac.org/signatory-search/ Search in Google Scholar

4. Iso/iec 15189:2012 [Internet]. ISO. 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/56115.html Search in Google Scholar

5. Györfi I, Pál K, Mănescu IB, Oprea OR, Dobreanu M. Atellica CH 930 chemistry analyzer versus Cobas 6000 c501 and Architect ci4100-a multi-analyte method comparison. Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator. 2021;29(4):421-38. DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2021-0027 DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

6. Iso/iec 17043:2010 [Internet]. ISO. 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/29366.html Search in Google Scholar

7. European-accreditation.org. [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://european-accreditation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/EA-4-18.pdf Search in Google Scholar

8. European-accreditation.org. [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://european-accreditation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ea-4-21-inf-rev00-march-18.pdf Search in Google Scholar

9. Directory of EA Members and MLA signatories [Internet]. European Accreditation. 2018 [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://european-accreditation.org/ea-members/directory-of-ea-members-and-mla-signatories/ Search in Google Scholar

10. ISO 13528:2022 [Internet]. ISO. 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/78879.html Search in Google Scholar

11. Avram C, Mărușteri M. Normality assessment, few paradigms and use cases. Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator. 2022;30(3):251-60. DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2022-0030 DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

12. Wong SK. Evaluation of the use of consensus values in proficiency testing programmes. Accreditation and quality assurance. 2005;10(8):409-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00769-005-0029-0 DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

• Association of HLA class II alleles with suicidal behavior in a Transylvanian population
• The metabolic control and laboratory evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of telemedicine: a single-center experience
• Making the most out of proficiency testing participation for a medical laboratory from the standardization point of view
• Ferritin and procalcitonin in COVID-19 associated acute kidney injury – gender disparities, but similar outcomes
• On the relationship between CT measured abdominal fat parameters and three metabolic risk biomarkers
• The Role of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propertied (P1NP) Cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) as Potential Bone function markers in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
• Management of a case of Castleman’s disease coexisting with or occurring after transplanted Hodgkin’s lymphoma