1. bookVolumen 30 (2022): Heft 50 (June 2022)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-0532
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Mar 2011
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Sustainability Aspects of Parts Additive Manufacturing from Metal Powder

Online veröffentlicht: 23 Aug 2022
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 30 (2022) - Heft 50 (June 2022)
Seitenbereich: 37 - 44
Eingereicht: 29 Apr 2022
Akzeptiert: 16 May 2022
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1338-0532
Erstveröffentlichung
03 Mar 2011
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

[1] MASCARENHAS, J. 2004. Powder Metallurgy: A Major Partner of the Sustainable Development. Materials Science Forum Vols. 455-456, 857-860. Search in Google Scholar

[2] DALE, J. R. 2011. Sustainability Manufacturing within the PM Industry. International Journal of Powder Metallurgy 47(1). Search in Google Scholar

[3] KIANIAN, B., ANDERSON, C. 2017. Sustainability-Conscious Powder Metallurgy gear manufacturing an analysis of current challenges, In: VDI-Berichte 2294.2, International Conference on Gear Production 2017, pp. 1251-1264. Search in Google Scholar

[4] DALE, J. R. 2011. Powder Metallurgy-Intrinsically Sustainable. International Journal of Powder Metallurgy 47(1), 27-31. Search in Google Scholar

[5] KRUZHANOV, V., ARNHOLD, V. 2012. Energy consumption in powder metallurgical manufacturing, Powder Metallurgy Vol. 55 No. 1, 14-21. Search in Google Scholar

[6] KELLENS, K., MERTENS, R., PARASKEVAS, D., DEWULF, W., JOOST, R. DUFLOU, J. R. 2017 Environmental Impact of Additive Manufacturing Processes: Does AM contribute to a more sustainable way of part manufacturing? Procedia CIRP 61, 582 – 587.10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.153 Search in Google Scholar

[7] PRIARONE, P. C. et al. 2018. Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing: On the correlation between design choices and process sustainability, Procedia CIRP 78, 85–90.10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.058 Search in Google Scholar

[8] FREDRIKSSON, C. 2019. Sustainability of metal powder additive manufacturing, Procedia Manufacturing 33, 139–144. Search in Google Scholar

[9] NIAKI, M. K., TORABI, S. A., NONINO, F. 2019. Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: The role of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 222, 381-392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.019. Search in Google Scholar

[10] VERHOEFA, L. A., BUDDEB, B. W., CHOCKALINGAMB, C., NODARB, B. G., VAN WIJK, J.M. 2018. The effect of additive manufacturing on global energy demand: An assessment using a bottom-up approach. Energy Policy 112, 349–360, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.03410.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.034 Search in Google Scholar

[11] WATSON, J. K., TAMINGER, K. M. B. 2018 A decision-support model for selecting additive manufacturing versus subtractive manufacturing based on energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production 176, 1316-1322, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.009.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.009675003131534306 Search in Google Scholar

[12] PEREIRA, T., KENNEDY, J. V., POTGIETER, J. 2019. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manufacturing 30, 11–18. Search in Google Scholar

[13] www.epma.com, Introduction to Additive Manufacturing Technology. A Guide for Designers and Engineers. [Online]. [Accessed: 04-2022] Available at https://www.epma.com/epma-free-publications/product/download/file_id-13976. Search in Google Scholar

[14] KELLENS, K., BAUMERS, M., GUTOWSKI, T. G., FLANAGAN, W., LIFSET, R., DUFLOU, J. R. 2017. Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing. Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications, Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (1), DOI:10.1111/jiec.12629. DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[15] HUANG, S. H., LIU, P., MOKASDAR A., HOU, L. 2013. Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 67(5), 1191–1203. Search in Google Scholar

[16] MA, K., SMITH, T., LAVERNIA, E. J., SCHOENUNG, J. M. 2016. Environmental Sustainability of Laser Metal Deposition: The Role of Feedstock Powder and Feedstock Utilization Factor. Procedia Manufacturing 7, 198 – 204. Search in Google Scholar

[17] MORROW, W. R., QI, H., KIM, I., MAZUMDER, J., SKERLOS, S. J. 2007. Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing, Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 932-934. Search in Google Scholar

[18] SERRES, N., TIDU, D., SANKARE, S., HLAVKA, F. 2011. Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD (R) process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessment, Journal of Cleaner Production 19,1117-1124, DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.010. DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[19] UNOCIC, N. N., DUPONT, J. R. 2004. Process Efficiency Measurements in the Laser Engineered Net Shaping Process. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 35(1):143-152, DOI:10.1007/s11663-004-0104-7. DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[20] BAUMERS, M., TUCK, C., WILDMAN, R., ASHCROFT, I., HAGUE, R., 2011. Energy Inputs to Additive Manufacturing: Does Capacity Utilization Matter? In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings; 22nd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2011, pp. 30-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15275. Search in Google Scholar

[21] LIU, Z.Y., LI, C., FANG, X.Y., GUO, Y.B. 2018. Energy Consumption in Additive Manufacturing of Metal Parts. Procedia Manufacturing 26, 834–845. Search in Google Scholar

[22] www.fabbaloo.com, Sarah Goehrke: Is Metal 3D Printing Energy Efficient? [Online]. [Accessed: 04-2022] Available at https://www.fabbaloo.com/blog/2019/4/7/is-metal-3d-printing-energy-efficient. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Digital Alloys’ Guide to Metal Additive Manufacturing – Part 7, Energy Consumption in Metal Additive Manufacturing [Online]. [Accessed: 10-2019] Available at https://www.digitalalloys.com/blog/energy-consumption-metal-additive-manufacturing/. Search in Google Scholar

[24] PANDA, B. N., GARG, A. SHANKWAR, K. 2016. Empirical investigation of environmental characteristic of 3-D additive manufacturing process based on slice thickness and part orientation, Measurement 86, 293–300. Search in Google Scholar

[25] PARIS, H., MOKHTARIAN, H., COATANÉA, E., MUSEAU, M., ITUARTE, I.F. 2016. Comparative environmental impacts of additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 65/1, 29-32. Search in Google Scholar

[26] AZEVEDO, J. M. C., CABRERA SERRENHO, A., ALLWOOD, J. M. 2018. Energy and material efficiency of steel powder metallurgy, Powder Technology 328, 329–336. Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo