Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty: review

1. Grace JN, Sim FH. Fracture of the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988;(230):168-75.10.1097/00003086-198805000-00018Search in Google Scholar

2. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM. The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1982;(165):197-9.10.1097/00003086-198205000-00029Search in Google Scholar

3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. International classification of diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification. 6th ed., 2006.Search in Google Scholar

4. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1999; 30.2:209-214.10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70075-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Merkel KD, and Johnson EW Jr. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 1986; 68.1:29-43.10.2106/00004623-198668010-00005Search in Google Scholar

6. Engh GA. Periprosthetic fractures adjacent to total knee implants: treatment and clinical results. Instructional Course Lectures, 1998; 47:437-448.9571445Search in Google Scholar

7. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1997; 345:113-124.10.1097/00003086-199712000-00016Search in Google Scholar

8. Ritter MA et al. Rush rod fixation of supracondylar fractures above total knee arthroplasties. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995; 10.2:213-216.10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80130-5Search in Google Scholar

9. Ayers ME, Iorio R, Healy WL. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. 2005, Springer, New York, NY, 183-194.Search in Google Scholar

10. de Alencar PGC. Proposta de tratamento com enxerto ósseo cortical homólogo para a fratura distal do fêmur pós-artroplastia total do joelho. Rev. Bras. Ortop, 2001; 36.6:230-234.Search in Google Scholar

11. Bobak P et al. Nailed cementoplasty: a salvage technique for rorabeck type II periprosthetic fractures in octogenarians. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010; 25.6:939-944.10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.03419775855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Canton G et al. Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2017; 88.Suppl 2:118.Search in Google Scholar

13. Farouk O et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique?. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1999; 13.6:401-406.10.1097/00005131-199908000-0000210459598Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Biswas SP, Kurer MH, Mackenney RP. External fixation for femoral shaft fracture after Stanmore total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 1992; 74.2:313-314.10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.15449771544977Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Bae Dae K et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the locking and non-locking plating methods. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014; 22.11:2690-2697.10.1007/s00167-013-2572-223794003Search in Google Scholar

16. Müller FJf, Galler M, Füchtmeier B. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with orthogonal double plating for periprosthetic femoral fractures. International Orthopaedics, 2014; 38.12:2469-2472.10.1007/s00264-014-2464-125109478Search in Google Scholar

17. Wanlim K, Song JH, Jung-Jae K. Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty: even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation. International Orthopaedics, 2015; 39.10:1951-1957.10.1007/s00264-015-2970-926300375Search in Google Scholar

18. Boesmueller S et al. Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015; 127.19-20:770-778.10.1007/s00508-015-0818-326187336Search in Google Scholar

19. Lotzien S et al. Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial locking plates: a single-center experience. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019; 29.1:189-196.10.1007/s00590-018-2266-z29931530Search in Google Scholar

20. Ponzer S, Skoog A, Bergström G. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA) Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish SMFA (SMFA-Swe). Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 2003; 74.6:756-763.10.1080/0001647031001832414763711Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Austin SR et al. Why summary comorbidity measures such as the Charlson comorbidity index and Elixhauser score work. Medical Care, 2015; 53.9:e65.10.1097/MLR.0b013e318297429c381834123703645Search in Google Scholar

22. Viral G et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: clinical comparison and related complications of the femur plate system and retrograde-inserted supracondylar nail. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2014; 15.3:201-207.10.1007/s10195-014-0287-x418264424687558Search in Google Scholar

23. Meneghini RM et al. Modern retrograde intramedullary nails versus periarticular locked plates for supracondylar femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014; 29.7:1478-1481.10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.02524581897Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Park J, Ju Hong L. Comparison of retrograde nailing and minimally invasive plating for treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33-A) above total knee arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2016; 136.3:331-338.10.1007/s00402-015-2374-826646847Search in Google Scholar

25. Matlovich NF et al. Outcomes of surgical management of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2017; 32.1:189-192.10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.05627639307Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Kyriakidis T et al. Locking plates versus retrograde intramedullary nails in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures. A retrospective multicenter comparative study. Injury, 2019.10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.019Search in Google Scholar

27. Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2011; 55.2:111.10.4103/0019-5049.79879Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Hoellwarth JS et al. Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral replacement. Injury, 2018; 49.2:392-397.10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Leino OK et al. Operative results of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur in a single academic unit. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 2015; 104.3:200-207.10.1177/1457496914552343Search in Google Scholar

30. Saidi K et al. Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision components, distal femoral replacement prosthesis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014; 29.1:110-114.10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Çiçek H et al. An alternative treatment for osteoporotic Su Type III periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: Double locking plate fixation. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 2018; 52.2:92-96.10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Zwingmann J et al. Long-term function following periprosthetic fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2016; 83.6:381-387.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bonnevialle P et al. Interprosthetic femoral fractures: Morbidity and mortality in a retrospective, multicenter study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2019; 105.4:579-585.Search in Google Scholar

34. Hoffmann MF, Lotzien S, Schildhauer TA. Clinical outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures treated with polyaxial locking plates. Injury, 2016; 47.4:934-938.10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.02626792022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Vestermark GL, Odum SM, Springer BD. Early femoral condyle insufficiency fractures after total knee arthroplasty: treatment with delayed surgery and femoral component revision. Arthroplasty Today, 2018; 4.2:249-253.10.1016/j.artd.2018.02.013Search in Google Scholar

36. de Alencar PGC et al. Periprosthetic fractures in total knee arthroplasty. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), 2010; 45.3:230-235.10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30362-1Search in Google Scholar

37. Kim HJ et al. Successful outcome with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2017; 103.2:263-268.10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.00727890690Search in Google Scholar

38. Schreiner AJ et al. Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty–an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2018; 19.1:323.10.1186/s12891-018-2250-030200931613185530200931Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Morwood MP et al. Outcomes of fixation for periprosthetic tibia fractures around and below total knee arthroplasty. Injury, 2019; 50.4:978-982.10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.01430929804Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

40. Mardian S et al. Quality of life and functional outcome of periprosthetic fractures around the knee following knee arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2015; 82.82:113-8.Search in Google Scholar

41. Nagwadia H, Prateek J. Outcome of osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018; 28.4:683-690.10.1007/s00590-017-2121-729299767Search in Google Scholar

42. Schreiner AJ et al. Komplikationen in der Behandlung periprothetischer Frakturen bei einliegender Knietotalendoprothese eine klinisch-radiologische Outcome-Analyse. Z Orthop Unfall, 2018;287-297.Search in Google Scholar

43. Cordeiro EN et al. Periprosthetic fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1990; 252:182-189.10.1097/00003086-199003000-00027Search in Google Scholar

44. Douglas DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. JBJS, 2001; 83.1:120.10.2106/00004623-200101000-00016Search in Google Scholar

45. Yoo JD, Nam KK. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 2015; 27,1:1-9. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.1.1.10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.1.1434963925750888Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

46. Canton G et al. Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2017; 88.Suppl 2:118.Search in Google Scholar

47. Whitehouse MR, Sanchit M. Periprosthetic fractures around the knee: current concepts and advances in management. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2014; 7.2:136-144.10.1007/s12178-014-9216-0409220624682988Search in Google Scholar

48. King SW et al. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Maturitas, 2018; 117:1-5.10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.01030314554Search in Google Scholar

49. Kuzyk PRT, Watts E, Backstein D. Revision total knee arthroplasty for the management of periprosthetic fractures. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2017; 25.9:624-633.10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-0068028837455Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

50. Sheu Y et al. Risk factors for fracture in middle-age and older-age men of African descent. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2014; 29.1:234-241.10.1002/jbmr.2016383069523775783Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

51. Khazai NB, Beck GR, Umpierrez GE. Diabetes and fractures—an overshadowed association. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Obesity, 2009; 16.6:435.10.1097/MED.0b013e328331c7eb374649719779334Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

52. Gonnelli S et al. Obesity and fracture risk. Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism: the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases, 2014; 11,1:9-14.10.11138/ccmbm/2014.11.1.009406444825002873Search in Google Scholar