[1. Pavlov H. Lower Extremity, Knee. Lateral view. In: Pavlov H, Burke M, Giesa M et al. Orthopaedist's guide to plain film imaging. 1999, New York, Thieme.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Berquist TH. The Knee. In: Berquist TH. Imaging of Orthopaedic Fixation Devices and Prostheses. 2009, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 251-332.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Paley D. Radiographic Assessment of Lower Limb Deformities. In: Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. 2002, New York, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H et al. TKA sagittal alignment with navigation system and conventional technique vary only few degrees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:1000-1006.10.1007/s11999-008-0449-3265005918712579]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE et al. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6, suppl):39-43.10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.03419553073]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Yehyawi TM, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR et al. Variances in Sagittal Femoral Shaft Bowing in Patients Undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464:99-104.10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e4a217767082]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB et al. Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated Res. 2009; 467:240 3-13.10.1007/s11999-009-0762-5286692319242764]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Seo JG, Kim BK, Moon YW et al. Bony landmarks for determining the mechanical axis of the femur in the sagittal plane during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009; 1:128-31.10.4055/cios.2009.1.3.128276674719885047]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Balakrishnan V, De Steigert R, Lowe A. Radiographic assessment of alignment following TKA: outline of standardized protocol and assessment of a newly devise trigonometric method of analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2010; 80: 344-9.10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05198.x20557509]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Hankemeier S, Gosling T, Richter M et al. Computer assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intra observer reliability compared to conventional method. Comput Aided Surg. 2006; 11:81-6.10.3109/1092908060062898516782643]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hinman RS, May RL, Crossley KM. Is there an alternative to the full leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis?. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 55:306-13.10.1002/art.2183616583430]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Yin L, Chen K, Guo L et al. Knee alignment in the trans-verse plane during weight-bearing activity and its implication for the tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015; 30(6):565-71.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.00325936578]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Maderbacher G, Baier C, Benditz A et al. Presence of rotational errors in long leg radiographs after total knee arthroplasty and impact on measured lower limb and component alignment. Int Orthop. 2017 Jan 31.10.1007/s00264-017-3408-328144722]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Yoo JH, Chang CB, Shin KS et al. Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:586-92.10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.00618514879]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Denis K, Van Ham G, Bellemans J et al. How correctly does an intramedullary rod represent the longitudinal tibial axes?. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2002; 397:424-33.10.1097/00003086-200204000-0005011953637]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Singh G, Tan JH, Sng BY et al. Restoring the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximize post-operative flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(10): 1354-1358.10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.3147724078531]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, et al. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deepflexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 50-3.10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.0840050]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Soda Y, Oishi J, Nakasa T et al. New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 127:167-70.10.1007/s00402-007-0295-x17372749]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Arabori M, Matsui N, Kuroda R et al. Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining an posterior stabilized TKA. J Orthop Sci. 2008; 13:46-50.10.1007/s00776-007-1191-518274855]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Clarke HD, Hentz JG. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:2711-6.10.1007/s11999-008-0454-6256502218719972]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Fehring TK, Odum SM, Hughes J et al. Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91:2335-41.10.2106/JBJS.H.0083419797567]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR et al. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331):35-46.10.1097/00003086-199610000-000068895617]Search in Google Scholar
[23. WeissmanBN. Radiographic evaluation of total joint replacement. In: Sledge CB, Ruddy S, Harris ED Jr. et al. Arthritis Surgery. 1994, Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 846–907.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Miller RK, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW et al. In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:900.10.1302/0301-620X.80B5.0800900]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Aslanian T et al. Patellar height assessment in total knee arthroplasty: a new method. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(12):2527-2531.10.1007/s00264-016-3256-627503481]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Lin CF, Wu JJ, Chen TS et al. Comparison of the Insall-Salvati ratio of the patella in patients with and without an ACL tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13(1):8-11.10.1007/s00167-004-0515-715654645]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[27. Allen AM, Ward WG, Pope TL et al. Imaging of the total knee arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995; 33:289–303.10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00420-1]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Eshnazarov KE, Seon JK, Song EK. Comparison of Radiological Assessments Patellar Resurfacing with Retention for Grade IV Osteoarthritis in Patellofemoral Joint accomplished Total Knee Arthroplasty. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 2016; 97(1):28-32.10.20862/0042-4676-2016-97-1-28-3227192770]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Malo M, Vince KG. The unstable patella after total knee arthroplasty: Etiology, prevention, and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11(5):364-371.10.5435/00124635-200309000-0000914565758]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R et al. Patella resurfacing in total knee replacement: functional evaluation and complications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9:S27-33.10.1007/s00167000016011354865]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[31. Figgie H, Goldberg V, Heiple K et al. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with posterior stabilized condylar knee pros-thesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68:1035.10.2106/00004623-198668070-00009]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001; 6:248-52.10.1007/s00776010004311484119]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[33. Selvarajah E, Hooper G. Restoration of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1099-1102.10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.03018757171]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[34. Mihalko WM, Boyle J, Clark LD et al. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:25-8.10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.01115660056]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ et al. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartimental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 0-7.10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.082]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Chia SL, Merican AM, Devadasan B et al. Radiographic features predictive of patellar maltracking during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(10):1217-1224.10.1007/s00167-009-0832-y]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Classen T, Wegner A, Muller RD et al. Femoral component rotation and Laurin angle after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010; 76(1):69-73.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Huang TW, Hsu WH, Peng KT et al. Total knee replacement in patients with significant femoral bowing in the coronal plane: a comparison of conventional and computer-assisted surgery in an Asian population. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93:345-50.10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25990]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[39. Baldini A, Anderson JA, Cerulli-Mariani P et al. Patellofemoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. Validation of a new weight-bearing axial radiographic view. J Bon Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 1810-7.10.2106/JBJS.E.00432]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Baena FR et al. Patellar thickness and lateral retinacular release affects patellofem-oral kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22(3):526-533.10.1007/s00167-012-2312-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[41. Bengs BC, Scott RD. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:650-5.10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[42. Kaneka su K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y. Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (434):193-7.10.1097/01.blo.0000156819.24866.8b]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Takai S, Yoshino N, Isshiki T et al. Kneeling view: a new roentgenographic technique to assess rotational deformity and alignment of the distal femur. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:478-83.10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00065-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[44. Tokuhara Y, Kadoya Y, Kanekasu K et al. Evaluation of the flexion gap by axial radiography of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1327-30.10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17793]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Crossett LS, Rubash HE, Berger R. Computerized tomography in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR. Current Concepts in Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. 1996, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott-Raven, 235–248.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Berger RA, Seel MJ, Schleiden M et al Determination of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. Orthop Trans. 1993; 17:427.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Suter T, Zanetti M, Schmid M et al. Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:744-8.10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.01216877163]Search in Google Scholar
[48. De Valk EJ, Noorduyn JC, Mutsaerts EL. How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review. Review article. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(11):3517-3528.10.1007/s00167-016-4325-527655141]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Yu HC, Wen H, Zhang Y et al. Research on the reliability of the Akagi line as a reference axis to guide for rotational alignment of the proximal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015; 28(10):884-7.]Search in Google Scholar