Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Recycling of foundry sand wastes in self-compacting concretes: Use as cementitious materials and fine aggregates


Zitieren

Figure 1:

Foundry sand wastes used in this work: (a) rejected zone, (b) FSW as sand.
Foundry sand wastes used in this work: (a) rejected zone, (b) FSW as sand.

Figure 2:

SEM images of used foundry sand waste: (a) at 400x magnitude, (b) at 100x magnitude.
SEM images of used foundry sand waste: (a) at 400x magnitude, (b) at 100x magnitude.

Figure 3:

Particle size distribution of natural sand and foundry sand wastes.
Particle size distribution of natural sand and foundry sand wastes.

Figure 4:

Particle size distribution of cement and crushed foundry sand in volume fraction obtained by Laser Granulometry: (a) cement, (b) crushed foundry sand waste.
Particle size distribution of cement and crushed foundry sand in volume fraction obtained by Laser Granulometry: (a) cement, (b) crushed foundry sand waste.

Figure 5:

Particle size distribution of cement and crushed foundry sand waste.
Particle size distribution of cement and crushed foundry sand waste.

Figure 6:

Pozzolanic activity of FSW obtained by the saturated lime test.
Pozzolanic activity of FSW obtained by the saturated lime test.

Figure 7:

Particle size analysis by sieving of gravel 8/16.
Particle size analysis by sieving of gravel 8/16.

Figure 8:

Mixer and molds used for self-compacting concrete: (a) concrete mixer, (b) cubic samples (150×150×150 mm3), (c) prismatic samples (70×70×280 mm3).
Mixer and molds used for self-compacting concrete: (a) concrete mixer, (b) cubic samples (150×150×150 mm3), (c) prismatic samples (70×70×280 mm3).

Figure 9:

Mechanical tests: (a) compressive, (b) flexural strength.
Mechanical tests: (a) compressive, (b) flexural strength.

Figure 10:

Fluidity concretes studied by sand substitution: (a) obtained result, (b) practical flow test of concrete.
Fluidity concretes studied by sand substitution: (a) obtained result, (b) practical flow test of concrete.

Figure 11:

Filling capacity of the concretes studied according to the rate of substitution of sand by FSW: (a) filling capacity of the concretes, (b) practical L-box test of self-compacting concrete.
Filling capacity of the concretes studied according to the rate of substitution of sand by FSW: (a) filling capacity of the concretes, (b) practical L-box test of self-compacting concrete.

Figure 12:

Segregation index of the concretes studied according to the substitution rate of sand by FSW: (a) segregation index of the concretes, (b) segregation test of self-compacting concretes.
Segregation index of the concretes studied according to the substitution rate of sand by FSW: (a) segregation index of the concretes, (b) segregation test of self-compacting concretes.

Figure 13:

Mechanical strength development of studied self-compacting concretes: (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural strength tested at 28d.
Mechanical strength development of studied self-compacting concretes: (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural strength tested at 28d.

Figure 14:

Evolution of the dynamic elasticity coefficient of concretes according to the substitution rate of sand by FSW.
Evolution of the dynamic elasticity coefficient of concretes according to the substitution rate of sand by FSW.

Figure 15:

Fluidity of concretes studied by cement substitution.
Fluidity of concretes studied by cement substitution.

Figure 16:

Filling capacity of the concretes studied according to the substitution rate of cement by foundry sand waste.
Filling capacity of the concretes studied according to the substitution rate of cement by foundry sand waste.

Figure 17:

Stability of concretes studied.
Stability of concretes studied.

Figure 18:

Evolution of the mechanical strength of the concretes studied: (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural strength tested at 28d.
Evolution of the mechanical strength of the concretes studied: (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural strength tested at 28d.

Figure 19:

Dynamic elastic modulus of the concretes studied.
Dynamic elastic modulus of the concretes studied.

Physical properties of natural sand and foundry sand wastes.

Natural Sand NS Foundry Sand Wastes FSW
Apparent density (kg/m3) 3150 1240
Specific gravity (kg/m3) 2760 2400
Fineness modulus 2 2.47

Mixture details of self-compacting concrete (SCC).

Component [Kg/m3] SCC
Cement * 500
Limestone fillers 118.1
Natural sand** 843.7
Water 216
Superplasticizer 7.5
Gravel 8/16 742.8

Chemical analysis of foundry sand wastes.

Compounds CaO SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 SO3 Na2O K2O MgO P2O5
(%) 6.328 60.762 11.688 9.642 1.851 0.010 1.281 2.195 0.010

Mixture details of self-compacting concrete (SCC): Cement substitution case.

Component [Kg/m3] SCC0 SCC10 SCC20 SCC30
Cement * 500 450 400 350
Crushed FSW 0 50 100 150
Limestone fillers 118.1 118.1 118.1 118.1
Natural sand 844 844 844 844
Water 216 216 216 216
Superplasticizer 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Gravel 8/16 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8

Mixture details of self-compacting concrete (CFS): Sand substitution case.

Component [Kg/m3] CFS0 CFS10 CFS30 CFS50
Cement 500 500 500 500
Limestone fillers 118.1 118.1 118.1 118.1
Natural sand** 844 844 844 844
Foundry sand waste 0 84.4 168.8 253
Water 216 216 216 216
Superplasticizer 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Gravel 8/16 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8
eISSN:
1854-7400
Sprache:
Englisch