Zitieren

Figure 1:

Geological map indicating the two traverses and the sampling points.
Geological map indicating the two traverses and the sampling points.

Figure 2:

Variation between the magnetic intensity and that of (a) Uranium concentration, (b) Thorium concentration, (c) Potassium concentration at T1.
Variation between the magnetic intensity and that of (a) Uranium concentration, (b) Thorium concentration, (c) Potassium concentration at T1.

Figure 3:

Variation between the magnetic intensity and that of (a) Uranium concentration, (b)Thorium concentration, (c) Potassium concentration at T2.
Variation between the magnetic intensity and that of (a) Uranium concentration, (b)Thorium concentration, (c) Potassium concentration at T2.

Figure 4:

Contour map showing the distribution of (a) magnetic intensity, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T1.
Contour map showing the distribution of (a) magnetic intensity, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T1.

Figure 5:

Contour map showing the distribution of (a) magnetic intensity, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T2.
Contour map showing the distribution of (a) magnetic intensity, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T2.

Figure 6:

3D Surface plot of (a) magnetic anomaly, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T1.
3D Surface plot of (a) magnetic anomaly, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T1.

Figure 7:

3D surface plot of (a) magnetic anomaly, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T2.
3D surface plot of (a) magnetic anomaly, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T2.

Figure 8:

Regression plot between magnetic anomalous response to (a) uranium concentration, (b) thorium concentration, (c) potassium concentration.
Regression plot between magnetic anomalous response to (a) uranium concentration, (b) thorium concentration, (c) potassium concentration.

Summary of t-test inferential statistics.

Survey parameters t-calculated t-critical p-value r-value
Traverse 1 M – U 1.71 2.02 0.09 0.84
M – Th 0.87 2.02 0.39 0.79
M – K −0.89 2.02 0.37 −0.47

Traverse 2 M – U 0.99 2.02 0.32 0.89
M – Th 0.04 2.02 0.96 0.74
M – K −2.66 2.02 0.06 −0.24
eISSN:
1854-7400
Sprache:
Englisch