[
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1406.5823
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayraktar, S. (2001). A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Science Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2001.10782344
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker-Mrotzek, M., & Woerfel, T. (2020). Sprachsensibler Unterricht und Deutsch als Zweitsprache als Gegenstand der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. In C. Cramer et al. (Eds.), Handbuch Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung (pp. 98–104). UTB.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolte, C., & Pastille, R. (2010). Naturwissenschaften zur Sprache bringen. Strategien und Umsetzung eines sprachaktivierend naturwissen- schaftlichen Unterrichts. In G. Fenkart, A. Lembens, & E. Erlacher-Zeitlinger (Eds.), Sprache, Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften (pp. 26–46). StudienVerlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwis- senschaftler. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, B. A., Donovan, B., & Wild, A. (2019). Language and cognitive interference: How using complex scientific language limits cognitive performance. Science Education, 103(4), 750–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21509
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, B. A., Ryoo, K., & Rodriguez, J. (2010). Pathway Towards Fluency: Using ‘disaggregate instruction’ to promote science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1465–1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903117921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92(4), 708–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Echevarría, J. (2012). Effective Practices for Increasing the Achievement of English Learners. CREATE Brief. Center for Research on the Educational Achievement and Teaching of English Language Learners (CREATE).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R. (2006). A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, 23(3), 290–325. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt330oa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gebhard, U., Höttecke, D., & Rehm, M. (2017). Naturwissenschaft und Sprache. In U. Gebhard, D. Höttecke, & M. Rehm, Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (pp. 107–124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19546-9_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gogolin, I., & Lange, I. (2011). Bildungssprache und Durchgängige Sprachbildung. In S. Fürstenau & M. Gomolla (Eds.), Migration und schulischer Wandel: Mehrsprachigkeit (pp. 107–127). VS-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Höttecke, D. et al. (2017). Vergleichende Messung fachsprachlicher Fähigkeiten in den Domänen Physik und Sport. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 23(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-017-0055-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Institute for Educational Monitoring and Quality Control Hamburg. 2008. „C-Test Klasse 7/8 ‘Überfall +3‘“.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karlsson, A., Nygård Larsson, P., & Jakobsson, A. (2019). Multilingual students’ use of translanguaging in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2049–2069. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477261
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leyrat, C. et al. (2018). Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Which analyses should be used? International Journal of Epidemiology, 47(1), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lüdecke, D. (2022). sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science (R package version 2.8.12). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markic, S., & Childs, P. E. (2016). Language and the teaching and learning of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP90006B
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDonnell, L., Barker, M. K., & Wieman, C. (2016). Concepts first, jargon second improves student articulation of understanding. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20922
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meneses, A., Escobar, J.-P., & Véliz, S. (2018). The effects of multimodal texts on science reading comprehension in Chilean fifth-graders: Text scaffolding and comprehension skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(18), 2226–2244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1527472
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prediger, S., & Wessel, L. (2013). Fostering German-language leanrers’ constructions of meanings for fractions—Design and effects of a language- and mathematics-integrated intervention. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 435–456.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reiss, K. et al. (Eds.). (2019). PISA 2018. Waxmann. https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830991007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rincke, K. (2010). Von der Alltagssprache zur Fachsprache. Bruch oder schrittweiser Übergang? In G. Fenkart, A. Lembens, & E. Erlacher- Zeitlinger (Eds.), Sprache, Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften (pp. 47–62). StudienVerlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rincke, K. (2011). It’s Rather like Learning a Language: Development of talk and conceptual understanding in mechanics lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003615343
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roussel, S. et al. (2017). Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: A cognitive load theory approach. Learning and Instruction, 52, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learnin-struc.2017.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schleppegrell, M. (2019). Language and knowledge: How nouns contribute to knowledge construction across school subjects. RISTAL, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/rt1821
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanat, P. et al. (2022). IQB-Bildungstrend 2021. Kompetenzen in den Fächern Deutsch und Mathematik am Ende der 4. Jahrgangsstufe im dritten Ländervergleich. Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajmel, T. (2010). Sensitizing Science Teachers to the Needs of Second Language Learners. In C. Benholz, G. Kniffka, & E. Winters-Ohle (Eds.), Fachliche und sprachliche Förderung von Schülern mit Migrationsgeschichte. Beiträge des Mercator-Symposions im Rahmen des 15. AILA- Weltkongresses „Mehrsprachigkeit: Herausfor- derungen und Chancen“ (pp. 53–74). Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajmel, T. (2017). Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17123-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Theyßen, H. (2014). Methodik von Vergleichsstudien zur Wirkung von Unterrichtsmedien. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Methoden in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung (pp. 67–80). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole et al., Eds.). Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann, G. Vakar, & A. Kozulin, Eds.; Rev. and expanded ed). MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilhelm, M., Rehm, M., & Reinhardt, V. (2020). Das Transversale und das Spezifische von wirksamem Fachunterricht – Ansätze einer Allgemeinen Fachdidaktik. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:18854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woerfel, T. et al. (2020). Systematisches Review zur Wirkung von didaktisch-methodischen Ansätzen des sprachsensiblen Unterrichts. Mercator-Institut für Sprachförderung und Deutsch als Zweitsprache, Universität zu Köln.
]Search in Google Scholar