[
Al Khalil, O. (2020). Structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry as alternative to laser scanning for 3D modelling of historical monuments. Open Science Journal, 5(2), doi:10.23954/osj.v5i2.2327.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balletti, C., Beltrame, C., Costa, E., Guerra, F., and Vernier, P. (2016). 3D reconstruction of marble shipwreck cargoes based on underwater multi-image photogrammetry. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 3(1):1–8, doi:10.1016/j.daach.2015.11.003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Błaszczak-Bąk, W., Suchocki, C., and Mrówczyńska, M. (2022). Optimization of point clouds for 3D bas-relief modeling. Automation in Construction, 140:104352, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bocheńska, A., Markiewicz, J., and Łapiński, S. (2019). The combination of the image and range-based 3D acquisition in archaeological and architectural research in the royal castle in Warsaw. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42(2/W15):177–184, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-177-2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, L., Chen, S., Liu, X., Xu, H., Wu, Y., Li, M., and Chen, Y. (2018). Registration of laser scanning point clouds: A review. Sensors, 18(5):1641, doi:10.3390/s18051641.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du, X. and Zhuo, Y. (2009). A point cloud data reduction method based on curvature. In 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design, pages 914–918. IEEE, doi:10.1109/CAIDCD.2009.5375038.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Favre, K., Pressigout, M., Marchand, E., and Morin, L. (2021). A plane-based approach for indoor point clouds registration. In 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 7072–7079. IEEE, doi:10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412379.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GharehTappeh, Z. S. and Peng, Q. (2021). Simplification and unfolding of 3D mesh models: review and evaluation of existing tools. Procedia CIRP, 100:121–126, doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guidi, G. (2014). Terrestrial optical active sensors – theory & applications. In 3D recording and modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage: theory and best practices, pages 39–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heok, T. K. and Daman, D. (2004). A review on level of detail. In International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, 2004, CGIV 2004, pages 70–75. IEEE, doi:10.1109/CGIV.2004.1323963.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://polska-org.pl (2023). Description of the monument. Retrieved from https://polska-org.pl/8980295,Koszalin,Pomnik_Wiezi_Polonii_z_Macierza.html. Last accessed April 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hui, Z., Cheng, P., Guan, Y., and Nie, Y. (2019). Review on airborne LiDAR point cloud filtering. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 55(6):060001, doi:10.3788/LOP55.060001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jandyal, A., Chaturvedi, I., Wazir, I., Raina, A., and Haq, M. I. U. (2022). 3D printing–a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3:33–42, doi:10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kadhim, I., Abed, F. M., Vilbig, J. M., Sagan, V., and DeSilvey, C. (2023). Combining remote sensing approaches for detecting marks of archaeological and demolished constructions in Cahokia’s Grand Plaza, Southwestern Illinois. Remote Sensing, 15(4):1057, doi:10.3390/rs15041057.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kazhdan, M., Chuang, M., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Hoppe, H. (2020). Poisson surface reconstruction with envelope constraints. In Computer graphics forum, volume 39, pages 173–182. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/cgf.14077.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klapa, P. and Gawronek, P. (2022). Synergy of geospatial data from TLS and UAV for Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM). Remote Sensing, 15(1):128, doi:10.3390/rs15010128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, H., Yamada, T., Jolivet, P., Furuta, K., Kondoh, T., Izui, K., and Nishiwaki, S. (2021). Full-scale 3D structural topology optimization using adaptive mesh refinement based on the level-set method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 194:103561, doi:10.1016/j.finel.2021.103561.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubis, A. R., Lubis, M., and Al, K. (2020). Optimization of distance formula in K-Nearest Neighbor method. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(1):326–338, doi:10.11591/eei.v9i1.1464.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mara, H. and Krömker, S. (2017). Visual computing for archaeological artifacts with integral invariant filters in 3D. In GCH 2017 – Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, pages 37–47. doi:10.2312/gch.20171290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, D. and Scherer, S. (2015). Voxnet: A 3D convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. doi:10.1109/IROS.2015.7353481.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCarthy, J. (2014). Multi-image photogrammetry as a practical tool for cultural heritage survey and community engagement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 43:175–185, doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.01.010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mistretta, F., Sanna, G., Stochino, F., and Vacca, G. (2019). Structure from motion point clouds for structural monitoring. Remote Sensing, 11(16):1940, doi:10.3390/rs11161940.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montuori, R., Gilabert-Sansalvador, L., and Rosado-Torres, A. L. (2020). 3D printing for dissemination of Maya architectural heritage: The Acropolis of La Blanca (Guatemala). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 44(M-1):481–488, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-1-2020-481-2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murtiyoso, A., Grussenmeyer, P., Landes, T., and Macher, H. (2021). First assessments into the use of commercial-grade solid state lidar for low cost heritage documentation. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43(B2):599–604, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-599-2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neumüller, M., Reichinger, A., Rist, F., and Kern, C. (2014). 3D printing for cultural heritage: Preservation, accessibility, research and education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), volume 8355, pages 119–134. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44630-0_9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nezhadarya, E., Taghavi, E., Razani, R., Liu, B., and Luo, J. (2020). Adaptive hierarchical down-sampling for point cloud classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12956–12964. doi:10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01297.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nowak, R., Orłowicz, R., and Rutkowski, R. (2020). Use of TLS (LiDAR) for building diagnostics with the example of a historic building in Karlino. Buildings, 10(2):24, doi:10.3390/buildings10020024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Jimenez Fernandez-Palacios, B., Muñoz-Nieto, Á. L., Arias-Sanchez, P., and Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. (2017). Mobile LiDAR system: New possibilities for the documentation and dissemination of large cultural heritage sites. Remote Sensing, 9(3):189, doi:10.3390/rs9030189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salwierz, A. and Szymczyk, T. (2020). Methods of creating realistic spaces–3D scanning and 3D modelling. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 14:101–108, doi:10.35784/jcsi.1584.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sammartano, G., Avena, M., Fillia, E., and Spanò, A. (2023). Integrated HBIM-GIS models for multi-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of historical buildings. Remote Sensing, 15(3):833, doi:10.3390/rs15030833.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shahrubudin, N., Lee, T. C., and Ramlan, R. (2019). An overview on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manufacturing, 35:1286–1296, doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shih, N.-J. and Chen, Y. (2020). LiDAR-and AR-Based monitoring of evolved building facades upon zoning conflicts. Sensors, 20(19):5628, doi:10.3390/s20195628.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suchocki, C., Błaszczak-Bąk, W., Damięcka-Suchocka, M., Jagoda, M., and Masiero, A. (2020a). On the use of the OptD method for building diagnostics. Remote Sensing, 12(11):1806, doi:10.3390/rs12111806.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suchocki, C., Błaszczak-Bąk, W., Janicka, J., and Dumalski, A. (2021). Detection of defects in building walls using modified OptD method for down-sampling of point clouds. Building Research & Information, 49(2):197–215, doi:10.1080/09613218.2020.1729687.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suchocki, C., Damięcka-Suchocka, M., Katzer, J., Janicka, J., Rapiński, J., and Stałowska, P. (2020b). Remote detection of moisture and bio-deterioration of building walls by time-of-flight and phase-shift terrestrial laser scanners. Remote Sensing, 12(11):1708, doi:10.3390/rs12111708.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan, K., Cheng, X., Ju, Q., and Wu, S. (2016). Correction of mobile TLS intensity data for water leakage spots detection in metro tunnels. IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters, 13(11):1711–1715, doi:10.1109/LGRS.2016.2605158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Temizer, T., Nemli, G., Ekizce, E., Ekizce, A., Demir, S., Bayram, B., Askin, F., Cobanoglu, A., and Yilmaz, H. (2013). 3D documentation of a historical monument using terrestrial laser scanning case study: Byzantine Water Cistern, Istanbul. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40:623–628, doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-623-2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teppati Losè, L., Spreafico, A., Chiabrando, F., and Giulio Tonolo, F. (2022). Apple LiDAR sensor for 3D surveying: Tests and results in the cultural heritage domain. Remote Sensing, 14(17):4157, doi:10.3390/rs14174157.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ðurić, I., Vasiljević, I., Obradović, M., Stojaković, V., Kićanović, J., and Obradović, R. (2021). Comparative analysis of open-source and commercial photogrammetry software for cultural heritage. In eCAADe 2021 International Scientific Conference, pages 8–10. doi:10.52842/conf.ecaade.2021.2.243.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wabiński, J. and Mościcka, A. (2019). Natural heritage reconstruction using full-color 3D printing: a case study of the valley of five Polish ponds. Sustainability, 11(21):5907, doi:10.3390/su11215907.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, Z., Song, S., Khosla, A., Yu, F., Zhang, L., Tang, X., and Xiao, J. (2015). 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1912–1920. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298801.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, Z., Wu, L., Shen, Y., Li, F., Wang, Q., and Wang, R. (2014). Tridimensional reconstruction applied to cultural heritage with the use of camera-equipped UAV and terrestrial laser scanner. Remote sensing, 6(11):10413–10434, doi:10.3390/rs61110413.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yan, W., Behera, A., and Rajan, P. (2010). Recording and documenting the chromatic information of architectural heritage. Journal of cultural heritage, 11(4):438–451, doi:10.1016/j.culher.2010.02.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Youn, H.-C., Yoon, J.-S., and Ryoo, S.-L. (2021). HBIM for the characteristics of Korean traditional wooden architecture: bracket set modelling based on 3d scanning. Buildings, 11(11):506, doi:10.3390/buildings11110506.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zheng, J., Zhang, J., Li, J., Tang, R., Gao, S., and Zhou, Z. (2020). Structured3d: A large photo-realistic dataset for structured 3d modeling. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part IX 16, pages 519–535. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58545-7_30.
]Search in Google Scholar
, und 