Institutions at the Interface of Urban Planning and Real Estate

Adair A., Berry J., McGreal S., Poon J., Hutchison N., Watkins C., Gibb K., 2003, Benchmarking urban regeneration, RICS Foundation, London, England.Search in Google Scholar

Adams D., Dunse N., White M., 2005, Conceptualising State–Market Relations in Land and Property: The Growth of Institutionalism – Extension or Challenge to Mainstream Economics? In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 37-55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757789.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Angjellari-Dajci F., Cebula R.J., 2016, The impact of historic district designation on the prices of singlefamily homes in the oldest city in the United States, St. Augustine, Florida, Journal of Property Research, 33(1), 64-96.10.1080/09599916.2016.1151918Search in Google Scholar

Ball M., 1998, Institutions in British Property Research: A Review. Urban Studies, 35(9), 1501-1517.10.1080/0042098984259Search in Google Scholar

Ball M., Jones C., 2013, Introduction to Special Issue, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 167-169.10.1080/09599916.2013.790465Search in Google Scholar

Bramley G., 2013, Housing market models and planning Town Planning Review, 84(11), 9-35.10.3828/tpr.2013.2Search in Google Scholar

Bromley D.W., 2008a, Beyond Market Failure: Volitional Pragmatism as a New Theory of Public Policy, Economia Politica, XXV(2), pp. 219-241.Search in Google Scholar

Bromley D.W., 2008b, Volitional pragmatism, Ecological Economics, 68, 1-13.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Buitelaar E., Segeren A., 2011, Urban Structures and Land. The Morphological Effects of Dealing with Property Rights, Housing Studies, 26(5), 661-679.10.1080/02673037.2011.581909Search in Google Scholar

Cheshire P.C., 2013, Land market regulation: market versus policy failures, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 170-188.10.1080/09599916.2013.791339Search in Google Scholar

Crook A.D., Monk S., 2011, Planning gains, providing homes, Housing Studies, 26(7-8), 997-1018.10.1080/02673037.2011.619423Search in Google Scholar

d’Amato M., Kauko T., 2008, Hedonic indexes on residential rents in the real estate market of Bari: a contribution to urban planning, In Miller, D., Khakee, A., Hull, A. and Woltjer, J. (Eds.): New Principles in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 143-165.Search in Google Scholar

Dunse N., Thanos S., Bramley G., 2013, Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 221-238.10.1080/09599916.2013.795992Search in Google Scholar

Evans A.W., 2008, Economics and land use planning, Online edition. John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Goetgeluk R., Kauko T., Priemus H., 2005, Can Red Pay for Blue? Methods to Estimate the Added Value of Water in Residential Environments, Journal of Environmental Management and Planning, 48(1), 103-120.10.1080/0964056042000308175Search in Google Scholar

Guy S., Henneberry J., 2000, Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research, Urban Studies, 37(13), 2399-2416.10.1080/00420980020005398Search in Google Scholar

Havel M.B., 2009, Property rights regime in land development–Analysis of the influence of institutions on land development in terms of the property rights theory, Doctoral dissertation. HUT, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Surveying. Available online at https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/13437/isbn9789526036717.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [accessed 5 March, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Havel M.B., 2014, Delineation of property rights as institutional foundations for urban land markets in transition, Land Use Policy, 38, 615-626.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Healey P., 1991, Models of the development process; a review, Journal of Property Research, 8, 219-238.10.1080/09599919108724039Search in Google Scholar

Healey P., 1998, Regulating property development and the capacity of the development industry, Journal of Property Research, 15 (3), 211-227.10.1080/095999198368374Search in Google Scholar

Henneberry J., Parris S., 2013, The embedded developer: using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks, Town Planning Review, 84(2), 227-249.10.3828/tpr.2013.13Search in Google Scholar

Hillier J., 2010, Introduction, In J. Hillier and P. Healey (Eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 1-34.Search in Google Scholar

Hincks S., Leishman Ch., Watkins C., 2013, Introduction. Planning and housing: concepts, policy instruments and market analysis, Town Planning Review, 84(2), 1-7.10.3828/tpr.2013.9Search in Google Scholar

Hutchison N., Disberry A., 2015, Market forces or institutional factors: what hinders housing development on brownfield land? Journal of European Real Estate Research, 8(3), 285-304.10.1108/JERER-07-2015-0029Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe A.J., 1996, On the Role of Transaction Costs and Property Rights in Housing Markets, Housing Studies, 11(3), 425-434.10.1080/02673039608720866Search in Google Scholar

KAUKO T., 2003a, Planning processes, development potential and house prices: contesting positive and normative argumentation. Focus article. Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 113-126.10.1080/14036090310016970Search in Google Scholar

KAUKO T., 2003b, The Importance of the Context and the Level of Analysis. Author’s response, Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 134-136.10.1080/14036090310020885Search in Google Scholar

KAUKO T., 2012a, Recreating residential property values in the inner city – an adapted ‘old’ institutional approach, Journal of Property Research, 29(2), 153-176.10.1080/09599916.2011.649488Search in Google Scholar

KAUKO T., 2012b, An institutional analysis of property development, good governance and urban sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20(12), 2053-2071.10.1080/09654313.2012.722926Search in Google Scholar

Keil A., 2006, New Urban Governance Processes on the Level of Neighbourhoods, European Planning Studies, 14(3), 335-364.10.1080/09654310500420826Search in Google Scholar

Keogh G., D’Arcy E., 1999, Property market efficiency: an institutional economics perspective, Urban Studies, 36(13), 2401-2414.10.1080/0042098992485Search in Google Scholar

Keogh G., D’Arcy, É., 2000, Graaskamp, institutional economics, and the real estate market, In Essays in Honor of James A. Graaskamp: Ten Years After, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 385-409.10.1007/978-1-4615-1703-0_19Search in Google Scholar

Kucharska-Stasiak E., 2016, Grey zone in the Real estate market, Real Estate Management and Valuation, 24(3), 83-92.10.1515/remav-2016-0023Search in Google Scholar

Łaszek J., Olszewski K., Waszczuk J., 2016, Monopolistic Competition and Price Discrimination as a Development Company Strategy in the Primary Housing Market, Critical Housing Analysis, 3(2), 1-12.10.13060/23362839.2016.3.2.286Search in Google Scholar

Lauridsen J., Nannerup N., Skak M., 2013, House prices and land regulation in the Copenhagen area, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 205-220.10.1080/09599916.2013.791340Search in Google Scholar

Leffers D., 2017, Real estate developers’ influence of land use legislation in the Toronto region: An institutionalist investigation of developers, land conflict and property law, Urban Studies, 9 November, 1-17.10.1177/0042098017736426Search in Google Scholar

Liu N., Roberts D., 2013, Counter-urbanisation, planning and house prices: an analysis of the Aberdeen Housing Market Area, 1984-2010, Town Planning Review, 84(1), 81-105.10.3828/tpr.2013.5Search in Google Scholar

Monk S., Whitehead C.M.E., 1999, Evaluating the Economic Impact of Planning Controls in the United Kingdom: Some Implications for Housing, Land Economics, 75 (1), 74-93.10.2307/3146994Search in Google Scholar

Monk S., Pearce B., Whitehead C., 1991, Planning, land supply and house prices – a literature review, Land Economy Monograph 21, University of Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Mooya M.M., 2011, Making urban real estate markets work for the poor: Theory, policy and practice, Cities, 28, 238-244.10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Needham B., de Kam G., 2004, Understanding How Land is Exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and Transaction Costs, Urban Studies, 41(10), September, 2061-2076.10.1080/0042098042000256387Search in Google Scholar

Payne S., 2013, Pioneers, pragmatists and sceptics: speculative housebuilders and brownfield development in the early twenty-first century, Town Planning Review, 84(1), 37-62.10.3828/tpr.2013.3Search in Google Scholar

Peel D., Lloyd M.G., 2007, Neo-traditional planning. Towards a new ethos for land use planning? Land Use Policy 24, 393-403.10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.05.003Search in Google Scholar

Pogodzinsky J.M., SASS T.R., 1990, The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review, Land Economics, August, 66(3), 294-314.10.2307/3146731Search in Google Scholar

Pogodzinsky J.M., SASS T.R., 1991, Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey, Urban Studies, 28(4), 597-621.10.1080/00420989120080681Search in Google Scholar

Roulac S., 2007, Brand + beauty + utility = property value, Property Management, 25(5), 428-446.10.1108/02637470710824711Search in Google Scholar

Ruming K.J., 2010, Developer Typologies in Urban Renewal in Sydney: Recognising the Role of Informal Associations between Developers and Local Government, Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 65-83.10.1080/08111140903356403Search in Google Scholar

Scott W.R., 1995, Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Search in Google Scholar

Shatkin G., 2016, The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia, Cities, 53, 141-149.10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015Search in Google Scholar

Taylor Z., 2013, Rethinking planning culture: a new institutionalist approach, Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683-702.10.3828/tpr.2013.36Search in Google Scholar

Theurillat Th., Rérat P., Crevoisier O., 2015, The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories, Urban Studies, 52(8), 1414-1433.10.1177/0042098014536238Search in Google Scholar

Tiesdell S., Allmendinger P., 2005, Planning Tools and Markets: Towards an Extended Conceptualisation, In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 56-76. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757789.ch4Search in Google Scholar

van Rij E., Korthals Altes W., 2010, Looking for the optimum relationship between spatial planning and land development, Town Planning Review, 81(3), 283-30110.3828/tpr.2010.2Search in Google Scholar

Vatn A., 2005, Institutions and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Search in Google Scholar

Versteeg W., Hajer M., 2010, Is This How It Is, or Is This How It Is Here? In J. Hillier and P. Healey (Eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 159-182.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh E., 2017, Public versus private land controls in England and the US, International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 9(1), 18-31.10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0013Search in Google Scholar

Webster CH., 2005, The New Institutional Economics and the evolution of modern urban planning: Insights, issues and lessons, Town Planning Review, 76(4), 455-502.10.3828/tpr.76.4.5Search in Google Scholar

Weston R. 2003, Rhetoric: Methodology or Method? And Other Views from Heterodoxy, Comment on Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 132-133.10.1080/14036090310016989Search in Google Scholar