[Adair A., Berry J., McGreal S., Poon J., Hutchison N., Watkins C., Gibb K., 2003, Benchmarking urban regeneration, RICS Foundation, London, England.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adams D., Dunse N., White M., 2005, Conceptualising State–Market Relations in Land and Property: The Growth of Institutionalism – Extension or Challenge to Mainstream Economics? In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 37-55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757789.ch3]Search in Google Scholar
[Angjellari-Dajci F., Cebula R.J., 2016, The impact of historic district designation on the prices of singlefamily homes in the oldest city in the United States, St. Augustine, Florida, Journal of Property Research, 33(1), 64-96.10.1080/09599916.2016.1151918]Search in Google Scholar
[Ball M., 1998, Institutions in British Property Research: A Review. Urban Studies, 35(9), 1501-1517.10.1080/0042098984259]Search in Google Scholar
[Ball M., Jones C., 2013, Introduction to Special Issue, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 167-169.10.1080/09599916.2013.790465]Search in Google Scholar
[Bramley G., 2013, Housing market models and planning Town Planning Review, 84(11), 9-35.10.3828/tpr.2013.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Bromley D.W., 2008a, Beyond Market Failure: Volitional Pragmatism as a New Theory of Public Policy, Economia Politica, XXV(2), pp. 219-241.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bromley D.W., 2008b, Volitional pragmatism, Ecological Economics, 68, 1-13.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Buitelaar E., Segeren A., 2011, Urban Structures and Land. The Morphological Effects of Dealing with Property Rights, Housing Studies, 26(5), 661-679.10.1080/02673037.2011.581909]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheshire P.C., 2013, Land market regulation: market versus policy failures, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 170-188.10.1080/09599916.2013.791339]Search in Google Scholar
[Crook A.D., Monk S., 2011, Planning gains, providing homes, Housing Studies, 26(7-8), 997-1018.10.1080/02673037.2011.619423]Search in Google Scholar
[d’Amato M., Kauko T., 2008, Hedonic indexes on residential rents in the real estate market of Bari: a contribution to urban planning, In Miller, D., Khakee, A., Hull, A. and Woltjer, J. (Eds.): New Principles in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 143-165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunse N., Thanos S., Bramley G., 2013, Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 221-238.10.1080/09599916.2013.795992]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans A.W., 2008, Economics and land use planning, Online edition. John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goetgeluk R., Kauko T., Priemus H., 2005, Can Red Pay for Blue? Methods to Estimate the Added Value of Water in Residential Environments, Journal of Environmental Management and Planning, 48(1), 103-120.10.1080/0964056042000308175]Search in Google Scholar
[Guy S., Henneberry J., 2000, Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research, Urban Studies, 37(13), 2399-2416.10.1080/00420980020005398]Search in Google Scholar
[Havel M.B., 2009, Property rights regime in land development–Analysis of the influence of institutions on land development in terms of the property rights theory, Doctoral dissertation. HUT, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Surveying. Available online at https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/13437/isbn9789526036717.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [accessed 5 March, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Havel M.B., 2014, Delineation of property rights as institutional foundations for urban land markets in transition, Land Use Policy, 38, 615-626.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Healey P., 1991, Models of the development process; a review, Journal of Property Research, 8, 219-238.10.1080/09599919108724039]Search in Google Scholar
[Healey P., 1998, Regulating property development and the capacity of the development industry, Journal of Property Research, 15 (3), 211-227.10.1080/095999198368374]Search in Google Scholar
[Henneberry J., Parris S., 2013, The embedded developer: using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks, Town Planning Review, 84(2), 227-249.10.3828/tpr.2013.13]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillier J., 2010, Introduction, In J. Hillier and P. Healey (Eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 1-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hincks S., Leishman Ch., Watkins C., 2013, Introduction. Planning and housing: concepts, policy instruments and market analysis, Town Planning Review, 84(2), 1-7.10.3828/tpr.2013.9]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutchison N., Disberry A., 2015, Market forces or institutional factors: what hinders housing development on brownfield land? Journal of European Real Estate Research, 8(3), 285-304.10.1108/JERER-07-2015-0029]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaffe A.J., 1996, On the Role of Transaction Costs and Property Rights in Housing Markets, Housing Studies, 11(3), 425-434.10.1080/02673039608720866]Search in Google Scholar
[KAUKO T., 2003a, Planning processes, development potential and house prices: contesting positive and normative argumentation. Focus article. Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 113-126.10.1080/14036090310016970]Search in Google Scholar
[KAUKO T., 2003b, The Importance of the Context and the Level of Analysis. Author’s response, Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 134-136.10.1080/14036090310020885]Search in Google Scholar
[KAUKO T., 2012a, Recreating residential property values in the inner city – an adapted ‘old’ institutional approach, Journal of Property Research, 29(2), 153-176.10.1080/09599916.2011.649488]Search in Google Scholar
[KAUKO T., 2012b, An institutional analysis of property development, good governance and urban sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20(12), 2053-2071.10.1080/09654313.2012.722926]Search in Google Scholar
[Keil A., 2006, New Urban Governance Processes on the Level of Neighbourhoods, European Planning Studies, 14(3), 335-364.10.1080/09654310500420826]Search in Google Scholar
[Keogh G., D’Arcy E., 1999, Property market efficiency: an institutional economics perspective, Urban Studies, 36(13), 2401-2414.10.1080/0042098992485]Search in Google Scholar
[Keogh G., D’Arcy, É., 2000, Graaskamp, institutional economics, and the real estate market, In Essays in Honor of James A. Graaskamp: Ten Years After, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 385-409.10.1007/978-1-4615-1703-0_19]Search in Google Scholar
[Kucharska-Stasiak E., 2016, Grey zone in the Real estate market, Real Estate Management and Valuation, 24(3), 83-92.10.1515/remav-2016-0023]Search in Google Scholar
[Łaszek J., Olszewski K., Waszczuk J., 2016, Monopolistic Competition and Price Discrimination as a Development Company Strategy in the Primary Housing Market, Critical Housing Analysis, 3(2), 1-12.10.13060/23362839.2016.3.2.286]Search in Google Scholar
[Lauridsen J., Nannerup N., Skak M., 2013, House prices and land regulation in the Copenhagen area, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 205-220.10.1080/09599916.2013.791340]Search in Google Scholar
[Leffers D., 2017, Real estate developers’ influence of land use legislation in the Toronto region: An institutionalist investigation of developers, land conflict and property law, Urban Studies, 9 November, 1-17.10.1177/0042098017736426]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu N., Roberts D., 2013, Counter-urbanisation, planning and house prices: an analysis of the Aberdeen Housing Market Area, 1984-2010, Town Planning Review, 84(1), 81-105.10.3828/tpr.2013.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Monk S., Whitehead C.M.E., 1999, Evaluating the Economic Impact of Planning Controls in the United Kingdom: Some Implications for Housing, Land Economics, 75 (1), 74-93.10.2307/3146994]Search in Google Scholar
[Monk S., Pearce B., Whitehead C., 1991, Planning, land supply and house prices – a literature review, Land Economy Monograph 21, University of Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mooya M.M., 2011, Making urban real estate markets work for the poor: Theory, policy and practice, Cities, 28, 238-244.10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Needham B., de Kam G., 2004, Understanding How Land is Exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and Transaction Costs, Urban Studies, 41(10), September, 2061-2076.10.1080/0042098042000256387]Search in Google Scholar
[Payne S., 2013, Pioneers, pragmatists and sceptics: speculative housebuilders and brownfield development in the early twenty-first century, Town Planning Review, 84(1), 37-62.10.3828/tpr.2013.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Peel D., Lloyd M.G., 2007, Neo-traditional planning. Towards a new ethos for land use planning? Land Use Policy 24, 393-403.10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Pogodzinsky J.M., SASS T.R., 1990, The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review, Land Economics, August, 66(3), 294-314.10.2307/3146731]Search in Google Scholar
[Pogodzinsky J.M., SASS T.R., 1991, Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey, Urban Studies, 28(4), 597-621.10.1080/00420989120080681]Search in Google Scholar
[Roulac S., 2007, Brand + beauty + utility = property value, Property Management, 25(5), 428-446.10.1108/02637470710824711]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruming K.J., 2010, Developer Typologies in Urban Renewal in Sydney: Recognising the Role of Informal Associations between Developers and Local Government, Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 65-83.10.1080/08111140903356403]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott W.R., 1995, Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shatkin G., 2016, The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia, Cities, 53, 141-149.10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor Z., 2013, Rethinking planning culture: a new institutionalist approach, Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683-702.10.3828/tpr.2013.36]Search in Google Scholar
[Theurillat Th., Rérat P., Crevoisier O., 2015, The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories, Urban Studies, 52(8), 1414-1433.10.1177/0042098014536238]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiesdell S., Allmendinger P., 2005, Planning Tools and Markets: Towards an Extended Conceptualisation, In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 56-76. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757789.ch4]Search in Google Scholar
[van Rij E., Korthals Altes W., 2010, Looking for the optimum relationship between spatial planning and land development, Town Planning Review, 81(3), 283-30110.3828/tpr.2010.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Vatn A., 2005, Institutions and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.]Search in Google Scholar
[Versteeg W., Hajer M., 2010, Is This How It Is, or Is This How It Is Here? In J. Hillier and P. Healey (Eds): The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 159-182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh E., 2017, Public versus private land controls in England and the US, International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 9(1), 18-31.10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0013]Search in Google Scholar
[Webster CH., 2005, The New Institutional Economics and the evolution of modern urban planning: Insights, issues and lessons, Town Planning Review, 76(4), 455-502.10.3828/tpr.76.4.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Weston R. 2003, Rhetoric: Methodology or Method? And Other Views from Heterodoxy, Comment on Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 132-133.10.1080/14036090310016989]Search in Google Scholar