Breast cancer during pregnancy: retrospective institutional case series

1Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 Bray F Ferlay J Soerjomataram I Siegel RL Torre LA Jemal A Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 2018 68 394 424 10.3322/caac.2149230207593Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2Lee YY, Roberts CL, Dobbins T, Stavrou E, Black K, Morris J, et al. Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994-2008: a population-based linkage study. Bjog 2012; 119: 1572-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03475.x Lee YY Roberts CL Dobbins T Stavrou E Black K Morris J et al Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994-2008: a population-based linkage study Bjog 2012 119 1572 82 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03475.x353379422947229Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3Stensheim H, Moller B, van Dijk T, Fossa SD. Cause-specific survival for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or lactation: a registry-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 45-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4110 Stensheim H Moller B van Dijk T Fossa SD Cause-specific survival for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or lactation: a registry-based cohort study J Clin Oncol 2009 27 45 51 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.411019029418Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4Smith LH, Danielsen B, Allen ME, Cress R. Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1128-35. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00537-4 Smith LH Danielsen B Allen ME Cress R Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003 189 1128 35 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00537-414586366Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000-2014. NCHS Data Brief 2016; 232: 1-8. PMID: 26828319 Mathews TJ Hamilton BE Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000-2014 NCHS Data Brief 2016 232 1 8 PMID: 26828319Search in Google Scholar

6Rojas KE, Bilbro N, Manasseh DM, Borgen PI. A review of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: diagnosis, local and systemic treatment, and prognosis. J Womens Health 2019; 28: 778-84. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7264 Rojas KE Bilbro N Manasseh DM Borgen PI A review of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: diagnosis, local and systemic treatment, and prognosis J Womens Health 2019 28 778 84 10.1089/jwh.2018.726430481102Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Guidelines breast cancer. Version 5.2020. [internet]. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, et al, editors. [cited 2020 Aug 22]. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Guidelines breast cancer Version 5.2020. [internet]. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, et al, editors. [cited 2020 Aug 22]. Available at https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8Peccatori FA, Lambertini M, Scarfone G, Del Pup L, Codacci-Pisanelli G. Biology, staging, and treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy: reassessing the evidences. Cancer Biol Med 2018; 15: 6-13. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0146 Peccatori FA Lambertini M Scarfone G Del Pup L Codacci-Pisanelli G Biology, staging, and treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy: reassessing the evidences Cancer Biol Med 2018 15 6 13 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0146584233529545964Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9Gwyn KM, Theriault RL. Breast cancer during pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2000; 1: 239-43. doi: 10.1007/s11864-000-0035-8 Gwyn KM Theriault RL Breast cancer during pregnancy Curr Treat Options Oncol 2000 1 239 43 10.1007/s11864-000-0035-812057166Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10Genin AS, Lesieur B, Gligorov J, Antoine M, Selleret L, Rouzier R. Pregnancy-associated breast cancers: do they differ from other breast cancers in young women? Breast 2012; 21: 550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.05.002 Genin AS Lesieur B Gligorov J Antoine M Selleret L Rouzier R Pregnancy-associated breast cancers: do they differ from other breast cancers in young women? Breast 2012 21 550 5 10.1016/j.breast.2012.05.00222698618Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11Anders CK, Fan C, Parker JS, Carey LA, Blackwell KL, Klauber-DeMore N, et al. Breast carcinomas arising at a young age: unique biology or a surrogate for aggressive intrinsic subtypes? J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: e18-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.9199 Anders CK Fan C Parker JS Carey LA Blackwell KL Klauber-DeMore N et al Breast carcinomas arising at a young age: unique biology or a surrogate for aggressive intrinsic subtypes? J Clin Oncol 2011 29 e18 20 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.9199305586421115855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12Murphy CG, Mallam D, Stein S, Patil S, Howard J, Sklarin N, et al. Current or recent pregnancy is associated with adverse pathologic features but not impaired survival in early breast cancer. Cancer 2012; 118: 3254-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26654 Murphy CG Mallam D Stein S Patil S Howard J Sklarin N et al Current or recent pregnancy is associated with adverse pathologic features but not impaired survival in early breast cancer Cancer 2012 118 3254 9 10.1002/cncr.2665422086863Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD, Risch NJ. The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 1996; 77: 2318-24. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-Z Claus EB Schildkraut JM Thompson WD Risch NJ The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer Cancer 1996 77 2318 24 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-ZOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

14Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr, Orecchia R, Hoekstra HJ, Pavlidis N, Kesic V, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013; 24(Suppl 6): vi160-70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt199 Peccatori FA Azim HA Jr Orecchia R Hoekstra HJ Pavlidis N Kesic V et al Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 2013 24Suppl 6 vi160–70 10.1093/annonc/mdt199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15Loibl S, Schmidt A, Gentilini O, Kaufman B, Kuhl C, Denkert C, et al. Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: adapting recent advances in breast cancer care for pregnant patients. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 1145-53. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2413 Loibl S Schmidt A Gentilini O Kaufman B Kuhl C Denkert C et al Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: adapting recent advances in breast cancer care for pregnant patients JAMA Oncol 2015 1 1145 53 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2413Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16National Toxicology Program. NTP monograph: developmental effects and pregnancy outcomes associated with cancer chemotherapy use during pregnancy. NTP Monogr 2013; (2): i-214. PMID: 24736875 National Toxicology Program NTP monograph: developmental effects and pregnancy outcomes associated with cancer chemotherapy use during pregnancy NTP Monogr 2013 2 i–214 PMID: 24736875Search in Google Scholar

17Nettleton J, Long J, Kuban D, Wu R, Shaefffer J, El-Mahdi A. Breast cancer during pregnancy: quantifying the risk of treatment delay. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 414-8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00470-x Nettleton J Long J Kuban D Wu R Shaefffer J El-Mahdi A Breast cancer during pregnancy: quantifying the risk of treatment delay Obstet Gynecol 1996 87 414 8 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00470-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

18Azim HA Jr, Santoro L, Russell-Edu W, Pentheroudakis G, Pavlidis N, Peccatori FA. Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 30 studies. Cancer Treat Rev 2012; 38: 834-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.004 Azim HA Jr Santoro L Russell-Edu W Pentheroudakis G Pavlidis N Peccatori FA Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 30 studies Cancer Treat Rev 2012 38 834 42 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19Amant F, von Minckwitz G, Han SN, Bontenbal M, Ring AE, Giermek J, et al. Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2532-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6335 Amant F von Minckwitz G Han SN Bontenbal M Ring AE Giermek J et al Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study J Clin Oncol 2013 31 2532 9 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6335Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. [internet]. 2017. [cited 2020 Aug 21]. Available at: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. [internet] 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 21]. Available at https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

21Martinez MT, Bermejo B, Hernando C, Gambardella V, Cejalvo JM, Lluch A. Breast cancer in pregnant patients: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 230: 222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.029 Martinez MT Bermejo B Hernando C Gambardella V Cejalvo JM Lluch A Breast cancer in pregnant patients: a review of the literature Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018 230 222 7 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22Novotny DB, Maygarden SJ, Shermer RW, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration of benign and malignant breast masses associated with pregnancy. Acta Cytol 1991; 35: 676-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.004 Novotny DB Maygarden SJ Shermer RW Frable WJ Fine needle aspiration of benign and malignant breast masses associated with pregnancy Acta Cytol 1991 35 676 86 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23Woo JC, Yu T, Hurd TC. Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 91-8; discussion 9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.91 Woo JC Yu T Hurd TC Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review Arch Surg 2003 138 91 8 discussion 9 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.91Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24Shachar SS, Gallagher K, McGuire K, Zagar TM, Faso A, Muss HB, et al. Multidisciplinary management of breast cancer during pregnancy. Oncologist 2017; 22: 324-34. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0208 Shachar SS Gallagher K McGuire K Zagar TM Faso A Muss HB et al Multidisciplinary management of breast cancer during pregnancy Oncologist 2017 22 324 34 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0208Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25Yang WT, Dryden MJ, Gwyn K, Whitman GJ, Theriault R. Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. Radiology 2006; 239: 52-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2391050083 Yang WT Dryden MJ Gwyn K Whitman GJ Theriault R Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy Radiology 2006 239 52 60 10.1148/radiol.239105008316484353Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e210-e6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355 Committee Opinion No 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation Obstet Gynecol 2017 130 e210 e6 10.1097/AOG.000000000000235528937575Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27Nguyen CP, Goodman LH. Fetal risk in diagnostic radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012; 33: 4-10. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.09.003 Nguyen CP Goodman LH Fetal risk in diagnostic radiology Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012 33 4 10 10.1053/j.sult.2011.09.00322264898Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28Thomsen HS. Contrast media safety-an update. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.104 Thomsen HS Contrast media safety-an update Eur J Radiol 2011 80 77 82 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.10421856102Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29Committee Opinion No. 696: Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 777-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002014 Committee Opinion No 696: Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 2017 129 777 8 10.1097/AOG.000000000000201428333816Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30Amant F, Deckers S, Van Calsteren K, Loibl S, Halaska M, Brepoels L, et al. Breast cancer in pregnancy: recommendations of an international consensus meeting. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 3158-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.010 Amant F Deckers S Van Calsteren K Loibl S Halaska M Brepoels L et al Breast cancer in pregnancy: recommendations of an international consensus meeting Eur J Cancer 2010 46 3158 68 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.01020932740Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31Toesca A, Gentilini O, Peccatori F, Azim HA Jr, Amant F. Locoregional treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy. Gynecol Surg 2014; 11: 279-84. doi: 10.1007/s10397-014-0860-6 Toesca A Gentilini O Peccatori F Azim HA Jr Amant F Locoregional treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy Gynecol Surg 2014 11 279 84 10.1007/s10397-014-0860-6423790625419205Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32Gropper AB, Calvillo KZ, Dominici L, Troyan S, Rhei E, Economy KE, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 2506-11 Gropper AB Calvillo KZ Dominici L Troyan S Rhei E Economy KE et al Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant women with breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 2014 21 2506 1110.1245/s10434-014-3718-224756813Search in Google Scholar

33Khera SY, Kiluk JV, Hasson DM, Meade TL, Meyers MP, Dupont EL, et al. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer patients can safely undergo lymphatic mapping. Breast J 2008; 14: 250-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00570.x Khera SY Kiluk JV Hasson DM Meade TL Meyers MP Dupont EL et al Pregnancy-associated breast cancer patients can safely undergo lymphatic mapping Breast J 2008 14 250 4 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00570.x18476883Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34Gentilini O, Cremonesi M, Toesca A, Colombo N, Peccatori F, Sironi R, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: 78-83. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1217-7 Gentilini O Cremonesi M Toesca A Colombo N Peccatori F Sironi R et al Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 78 83 10.1007/s00259-009-1217-719662412Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35Fernandez-Delgado J, Lopez-Pedraza MJ, Blasco JA, Andradas-Aragones E, Sanchez-Mendez JI, Sordo-Miralles G, et al. Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1430-4. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn153 Fernandez-Delgado J Lopez-Pedraza MJ Blasco JA Andradas-Aragones E Sanchez-Mendez JI Sordo-Miralles G et al Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction Ann Oncol 2008 19 1430 4 10.1093/annonc/mdn15318390839Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36Mazzola R, Corradini S, Eidemueller M, Figlia V, Fiorentino A, Giaj-Levra N, et al. Modern radiotherapy in cancer treatment during pregnancy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 136: 13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.02.002 Mazzola R Corradini S Eidemueller M Figlia V Fiorentino A Giaj-Levra N et al Modern radiotherapy in cancer treatment during pregnancy Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019 136 13 9 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.02.00230878124Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37Raphael J, Trudeau ME, Chan K. Outcome of patients with pregnancy during or after breast cancer: a review of the recent literature. Curr Oncol 2015; 22: S8-18. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2338 Raphael J Trudeau ME Chan K Outcome of patients with pregnancy during or after breast cancer: a review of the recent literature Curr Oncol 2015 22 S8 18 10.3747/co.22.2338438179425848342Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38Beadle BM, Woodward WA, Middleton LP, Tereffe W, Strom EA, Litton JK, et al. The impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in women. Cancer 2009; 115: 1174-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24165 Beadle BM Woodward WA Middleton LP Tereffe W Strom EA Litton JK et al The impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in women Cancer 2009 115 1174 84 10.1002/cncr.24165306338719204903Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39Van Calsteren K, Verbesselt R, Ottevanger N, Halaska M, Heyns L, Van Bree R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents in pregnancy: a preclinical and clinical study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 1338-45. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.512070 Van Calsteren K Verbesselt R Ottevanger N Halaska M Heyns L Van Bree R et al Pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents in pregnancy: a preclinical and clinical study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010 89 1338 45 10.3109/00016349.2010.51207020846067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

40Cardonick E, Gilmandyar D, Somer RA. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1267-72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826c32d9 Cardonick E Gilmandyar D Somer RA Maternal and neonatal outcomes of dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer in pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 2012 120 1267 72 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826c32d9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41Hahn KM, Johnson PH, Gordon N, Kuerer H, Middleton L, Ramirez M, et al. Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero. Cancer 2006; 107: 1219-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22081 Hahn KM Johnson PH Gordon N Kuerer H Middleton L Ramirez M et al Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero Cancer 2006 107 1219 26 10.1002/cncr.2208116894524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

42Murthy RK, Theriault RL, Barnett CM, Hodge S, Ramirez MM, Milbourne A, et al. Outcomes of children exposed in utero to chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16: 500. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0500-0 Murthy RK Theriault RL Barnett CM Hodge S Ramirez MM Milbourne A et al Outcomes of children exposed in utero to chemotherapy for breast cancer Breast Cancer Res 2014 16 500 10.1186/s13058-014-0500-0430320725547133Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

43Gziri MM, Hui W, Amant F, Van Calsteren K, Ottevanger N, Kapusta L, et al. Myocardial function in children after fetal chemotherapy exposure. a tissue Doppler and myocardial deformation imaging study. Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172: 163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1849-7 Gziri MM Hui W Amant F Van Calsteren K Ottevanger N Kapusta L et al Myocardial function in children after fetal chemotherapy exposure a tissue Doppler and myocardial deformation imaging study. Eur J Pediatr 2013 172 163 70 10.1007/s00431-012-1849-723052619Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

44Berveiller P, Mir O. Taxanes during pregnancy: probably safe, but still to be optimized. Oncology 2012; 83: 239-40. doi: 10.1159/000341820 Berveiller P Mir O Taxanes during pregnancy: probably safe, but still to be optimized Oncology 2012 83 239 40 10.1159/00034182022907122Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

45Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Chrysikos D, Dimitrakakis C, Tsigginou A, Zografos CG, et al. Taxanes for breast cancer during pregnancy: a systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer 2013; 13: 16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.09.014 Zagouri F Sergentanis TN Chrysikos D Dimitrakakis C Tsigginou A Zografos CG et al Taxanes for breast cancer during pregnancy: a systematic review Clin Breast Cancer 2013 13 16 23 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.09.01423122538Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

46Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr. Targeted agents for cancer treatment during pregnancy. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41: 301-9. doi: 10.1016/j. ctrv.2015.03.001 Lambertini M Peccatori FA Azim HA Jr Targeted agents for cancer treatment during pregnancy Cancer Treat Rev 2015 41 301 9 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.03.00125795021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

47Isaacs RJ, Hunter W, Clark K. Tamoxifen as systemic treatment of advanced breast cancer during pregnancy − case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 405-8. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6080 Isaacs RJ Hunter W Clark K Tamoxifen as systemic treatment of advanced breast cancer during pregnancy − case report and literature review Gynecol Oncol 2001 80 405 8 10.1006/gyno.2000.608011263941Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

48Cu llins SL, Pridjian G, Sutherland CM. Goldenhar’s syndrome associated with tamoxifen given to the mother during gestation. JAMA 1994; 271: 1905-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510480029018 Cu llins SL Pridjian G Sutherland CM Goldenhar’s syndrome associated with tamoxifen given to the mother during gestation JAMA 1994 271 1905 6 10.1001/jama.1994.03510480029018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

49Fe jzo MS, MacGibbon KW, Mullin PM. Ondansetron in pregnancy and risk of adverse fetal outcomes in the United States. Reprod Toxicol 2016; 62: 87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.04.027 Fe jzo MS MacGibbon KW Mullin PM Ondansetron in pregnancy and risk of adverse fetal outcomes in the United States Reprod Toxicol 2016 62 87 91 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.04.02727151373Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

50An derka M, Mitchell AA, Louik C, Werler MM, Hernandez-Diaz S, Rasmussen SA. Medications used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012; 94: 22-30. doi: 10.1002/bdra.22865 An derka M Mitchell AA Louik C Werler MM Hernandez-Diaz S Rasmussen SA Medications used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012 94 22 30 10.1002/bdra.22865329908722102545Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

51Xiaoxiao P, Li L, Li M, Qian Z, Chenghao L. [Preliminary study on E-cadherin expression in dexamethasone-induced palatal cleft in mouse]. [Chinese]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015; 33: 581-4. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2015.06.006 Xiaoxiao P Li L Li M Qian Z Chenghao L [Preliminary study on E-cadherin expression in dexamethasone-induced palatal cleft in mouse] [Chinese]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015 33 581 4 10.7518/hxkq.2015.06.006703037627051948Open DOISearch in Google Scholar