This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging, Atri M, Alabousi A, Reinhold C, Akin EA, Benson CB, Bhosale PR, et al. ACR Appropriateness CriteriaR clinically suspected adnexal mass, no acute symptoms. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16: S77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.011ExpertPanel on Women’s ImagingAtriMAlabousiAReinholdCAkinEABensonCBBhosalePRet alACR Appropriateness CriteriaR clinically suspected adnexal mass, no acute symptomsJ Am Coll Radiol201916S779310.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sharma A, Apostolidou S, Burnell M, Campbell S, Habib M, Gentry-Maharaj A, et al. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012. 40: 338-44. doi: 10.1002/uog.12270SharmaAApostolidouSBurnellMCampbellSHabibMGentry-MaharajAet alRisk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS)Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2012403384410.1002/uog.12270Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Biggs WS, Marks ST. Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93: 676-81. PMID: 27175840BiggsWSMarksSTDiagnosis and management of adnexal massesAm Fam Physician20169367681PMID: 27175840Search in Google Scholar
Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Valentin L, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa AC, et al. Triaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group protocol. BJOG 2012; 119: 662-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03297.xVanCalster BTimmermanDValentinLMcIndoeAGhaem-MaghamiSTestaACet alTriaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group protocolBJOG20121196627110.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03297.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, et al. Ovarian-adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e1919896. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19896Thomassin-NaggaraIPonceletEJalaguier-CoudrayAGuerraAFournierLSStojanovicSet alOvarian-adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal massesJAMA Netw Open20203e191989610.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19896Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Valentini AL, Gui B, Miccò M, Mingote MC, De Gaetano AM, Ninivaggi V, et al. Benign and suspicious ovarian masses-MR imaging criteria for characterization: Pictorial review. J Oncol 2012; 2012: 481806. doi: 10.1155/2012/481806ValentiniALGuiBMiccòMMingoteMCDe GaetanoAMNinivaggiVet alBenign and suspicious ovarian masses-MR imaging criteria for characterization: Pictorial reviewJ Oncol2012201248180610.1155/2012/481806Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kataoka M, Kido A, Koyama T, Isoda H, Umeoka S, Tamai K, et al. MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 527-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20842KataokaMKidoAKoyamaTIsodaHUmeokaSTamaiKet alMRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE imagesJ Magn Reson Imaging2007255273410.1002/jmri.20842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Léautaud A, Marcus C, Ben Salem D, Bouché O, Graesslin O, Hoeffel C. Pelvic MRI at 3.0 Tesla. J Radiol 2009; 90: 277-86. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(09)72506-5LéautaudAMarcusCBen SalemDBouchéOGraesslinOHoeffelCPelvic MRI at 3.0 Tesla. J Radiol2009902778610.1016/s0221-0363(09)72506-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hussain SM, van den Bos IC, Oliveto JM, Martin DR. MR imaging of the female pelvis at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 537-44, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.01.008HussainSMvan den BosICOlivetoJMMartinDRMR imaging of the female pelvis at 3TMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2006145374410.1016/j.mric.2007.01.00817433982Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thomassin-Naggara I, Balvay D, Rockall A, Carette MF, Ballester M, Darai E, et al. Added value of assessing adnexal masses with advanced MRI techniques. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 785206. doi: 10.1155/2015/785206Thomassin-NaggaraIBalvayDRockallACaretteMFBallesterMDaraiEet alAdded value of assessing adnexal masses with advanced MRI techniquesBiomed Res Int2015201578520610.1155/2015/785206456459426413542Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Davarpanah AH, Kambadakone A, Holalkere NS, Guimaraes AR, Hahn PF, Lee SI. Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions. Abdom Radiol 2016; 41: 2466-75. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0909-2DavarpanahAHKambadakoneAHolalkereNSGuimaraesARHahnPFLeeSIDiffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesionsAbdom Radiol20164124667510.1007/s00261-016-0909-227660280Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dhanda S, Thakur M, Kerkar R, Jagmohan P. Diffusion-weighted imaging of gynecologic tumors: diagnostic pearls and potential pitfalls Radiographics 2014; 34: 1393-416. doi: 10.1148/rg.345130131DhandaSThakurMKerkarRJagmohanPDiffusion-weighted imaging of gynecologic tumors: diagnostic pearls and potential pitfallsRadiographics201434139341610.1148/rg.345130131Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2000; 20: 1445-70. doi: 10.1148/ radiographics.20.5.g00se101445JeongYYOutwaterEKKangHKImaging evaluation of ovarian massesRadiographics20002014457010.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se101445Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
El-Wekil A, Mohammad S Abdullah MS, El-Kholy SS. The role of MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Menoufia Med J 2017; 32: 106-11. doi: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_548_17El-WekilAMohammadSAbdullahMSEl-KholySSThe role of MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian lesionsMenoufia Med J2017321061110.4103/mmj.mmj_548_17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alt C, Bharwani N, Brunesch L, Danza FM, Derme M, El Sayed RF, et al. ESUR quick guide to female pelvis imaging 1.0. 2019: European Society of Urogenital Radiology. [cited 2020 May 15]. Available at: http://www.esur.org/fileadmin/content/2019/ESUR_2019_-_ESUR_Quick_Guide_to_Female_Pelvis_Imaging.pdfAltCBharwaniNBruneschLDanzaFMDermeMElSayed RFet alESUR quick guide to female pelvis imaging 1.02019European Society of Urogenital Radiologycited 2020 May 15Available athttp://www.esur.org/fileadmin/content/2019/ESUR_2019_-_ESUR_Quick_Guide_to_Female_Pelvis_Imaging.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Koc Z, Erbay G, Ulusan S, Seydaoglu G, Aka-Bolat F. Optimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for characterization of benign and malignant gynecological lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35: 650-9. doi: 10.1002/ jmri.22871KocZErbayGUlusanSSeydaogluGAka-BolatFOptimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for characterization of benign and malignant gynecological lesionsJ Magn Reson Imaging201235650910.1002/jmri.22871Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Foti PV, Attinà G, Spadola S, Caltabiano R, Farina R, Palmucci S, et al. MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging 2016; 7: 21-41. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0455-4FotiPVAttinàGSpadolaSCaltabianoRFarinaRPalmucciSet alMR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosisInsights Imaging20167214110.1007/s13244-015-0455-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meinhold-Heerlein I, Fotopoulou C, Harter P, Kurzeder C, Mustea A, Wimberger P, et al. The new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293: 695-700. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4035-8Meinhold-HeerleinIFotopoulouCHarterPKurzederCMusteaAWimbergerPet alThe new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implicationsArch Gynecol Obstet201629369570010.1007/s00404-016-4035-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 2001; 21: 475-90. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr09475OutwaterEKSiegelmanESHuntJLOvarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristicsRadiographics2001214759010.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr09475Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Caruso PA, Marsh MR, Minkowitz S, Karten G. An intense clinicopathologic study of 305 teratomas of the ovary. Cancer 1971; 27: 343-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197102)27:2<343::aid-cncr2820270215>3.0.co;2-bCarusoPAMarshMRMinkowitzSKartenGAn intense clinicopathologic study of 305 teratomas of the ovaryCancer197127343810.1002/1097-0142(197102)27:2<343::aid-cncr2820270215>3.0.co;2-bOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Nishie A, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 271-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20369NakayamaTYoshimitsuKIrieHAibeHTajimaTNishieAet alDiffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomasJ Magn Reson Imaging200522271810.1002/jmri.20369Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Agostinho L, Horta M, Salvador JC, Cunha TM. Benign ovarian lesions with restricted diffusion. Radiol Bras 2019; 52: 106-11. doi: 10.1590/01003984.2018.0078AgostinhoLHortaMSalvadorJCCunhaTMBenign ovarian lesions with restricted diffusionRadiol Bras2019521061110.1590/01003984.2018.0078Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Feuerlein S, Pauls S, Juchems MS, Stuber T, Hoffmann MH, Brambs HJ, et al. Pitfalls in abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging: how predictive is restricted water diffusion for malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1070-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2093FeuerleinSPaulsSJuchemsMSStuberTHoffmannMHBrambsHJet alPitfalls in abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging: how predictive is restricted water diffusion for malignancyAJR Am J Roentgenol20091931070610.2214/AJR.08.209319770331Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dunn DP, Kelsey NR, Lee KS, Smith MP, Mortele KJ. Non-oncologic applications of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the genitourinary system. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 1645-54. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0471-3DunnDPKelseyNRLeeKSSmithMPMorteleKJNon-oncologic applications of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the genitourinary systemAbdom Imaging20154016455410.1007/s00261-015-0471-326109511Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Duarte AL, Dias JL, Cunha TM. Pitfalls of diffusion-weighted imaging of the female pelvis. Radiol Bras 2018; 51: 37-44. doi: 10.1590/01003984.2016.0208DuarteALDiasJLCunhaTMPitfalls of diffusion-weighted imaging of the female pelvisRadiol Bras201851374410.1590/01003984.2016.0208Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian tumors: differentiation of benign and malignant solid components of ovarian masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010; 34: 173-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181c2f0a2TakeuchiMMatsuzakiKNishitaniHDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian tumors: differentiation of benign and malignant solid components of ovarian massesJ Comput Assist Tomogr201034173610.1097/RCT.0b013e3181c2f0a220351498Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moyle PL, Kataoka MY, Nakai A, Takahata A, Reinhold C, Sala E. Nonovarian cystic lesions of the pelvis. Radiographics 2010; 30: 921-38. doi: 10.1148/rg.304095706MoylePLKataokaMYNakaiATakahataAReinholdCSalaENonovarian cystic lesions of the pelvisRadiographics2010309213810.1148/rg.30409570620631360Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kim MY, Rha SE, Oh SN, Jung SE, Lee YJ, Kim YS, et al. MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 2009; 29: 495-507. doi: 10.1148/rg.292085070KimMYRhaSEOhSNJungSELeeYJKimYSet alMR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive reviewRadiographics20092949550710.1148/rg.29208507019325061Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Laurent PE, Thomassin-Piana J, Jalaguier-Coudray A. Mucin-producing tumors of the ovary: MR imaging appearance Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96: 1125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.11.034LaurentPEThomassin-PianaJJalaguier-CoudrayAMucin-producing tumors of the ovary: MR imaging appearanceDiagn Interv Imaging20159611253210.1016/j.diii.2014.11.03425753545Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Marko J, Marko KI, Pachigolla SL, Crothers BA, Mattu R, Wolfman DJ. Mucinous neoplasms of the ovary: radiologic-pathologic correlation Radiographics 2019; 39: 982-97. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180221MarkoJMarkoKIPachigollaSLCrothersBAMattuRWolfmanDJMucinous neoplasms of the ovary: radiologic-pathologic correlationRadiographics2019399829710.1148/rg.2019180221667728331283462Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vargas HA, Barrett T, Sala E. MRI of ovarian masses J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37: 265-81. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23721VargasHABarrettTSalaEMRI of ovarian massesJ Magn Reson Imaging2013372658110.1002/jmri.2372123355430Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung JI, Hahn ST. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis Radiographics 2002; 22: 1305-25. doi: 10.1148/rg.226025033JungSELeeJMRhaSEByunJYJungJIHahnSTCT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosisRadiographics20022213052510.1148/rg.22602503312432104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cho SM, Byun JY, Rha SE, Jung SE, Park GS, Kim BK, et al. CT and MRI findings of cystadenofibromas of the ovary. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 798-804. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2060-zChoSMByunJYRhaSEJungSEParkGSKimBKet alCT and MRI findings of cystadenofibromas of the ovaryEur Radiol20041479880410.1007/s00330-003-2060-z14504904Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tang YZ, Liyanage S, Narayanan P, Sahdev A, Sohaib A, Singh N, et al. The MRI features of histologically proven ovarian cystadenofibromas-an assessment of the morphological and enhancement patterns. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 48-56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2568-1TangYZLiyanageSNarayananPSahdevASohaibASinghNet alThe MRI features of histologically proven ovarian cystadenofibromas-an assessment of the morphological and enhancement patternsEur Radiol201323485610.1007/s00330-012-2568-122814827Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siegelman ES, Outwater EK. Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 5-18. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl455SiegelmanESOutwaterEKTissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imagingRadiology199921251810.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl45510405714Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP Jr. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2001; 21: 193-216; questionnaire 288-94. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja14193WoodwardPJSohaeyRMezzettiTP JrEndometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlationRadiographics200121193216questionnaire 288-9410.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja1419311158655Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rockall A, Forstner R. Adnexal diseases. In: Hodler J, Kubik-Huch RA, von Schulthess GK, editors. Diseases of the abdomen and pelvis 2018-2021: diagnostic imaging. Cham (CH): IDKD Book; 2018. p. 75-84.RockallAForstnerRAdnexal diseasesHodlerJKubik-HuchRAvon SchulthessGKDiseases of the abdomen and pelvis 2018-2021: diagnostic imagingCham (CH)IDKD Book2018758410.1007/978-3-319-75019-4_831314383Search in Google Scholar
Siegelman ES, Oliver ER. MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics 2012; 32: 1675-91. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125518SiegelmanESOliverERMR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearlsRadiographics20123216759110.1148/rg.32612551823065164Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Imaoka I, Wada A, Kaji Y, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Matsuo M, et al. Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1431-48. doi: 10.1148/rg.265045206ImaokaIWadaAKajiYHayashiTHayashiMMatsuoMet alDeveloping an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian massesRadiographics20062614314810.1148/rg.26504520616973774Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang H, Zhang GF, He ZY, Li ZY, Zhang GX. Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289: 357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2990-xZhangHZhangGFHeZYLiZYZhangGXProspective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosisArch Gynecol Obstet20142893576410.1007/s00404-013-2990-x23934242Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Funt SA, Hricak H. Ovarian malignancies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14: 329-37. doi: 10.1097/00002142-200308000-00005FuntSAHricakHOvarian malignanciesTop Magn Reson Imaging2003143293710.1097/00002142-200308000-0000514578777Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hussain SM, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES. MR imaging features of pelvic mucinous carcinomas. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 885-91. doi: 10.1007/s003300051029HussainSMOutwaterEKSiegelmanESMR imaging features of pelvic mucinous carcinomasEur Radiol2000108859110.1007/s00330005102910879695Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hann LE, Lui DM, Shi W, Bach AM, Selland DL, Castiel M. Adnexal masses in women with breast cancer: US findings with clinical and histopathologic correlation Radiology 2000; 216: 242-7. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.216.1.r00jl15242HannLELuiDMShiWBachAMSellandDLCastielMAdnexal masses in women with breast cancer: US findings with clinical and histopathologic correlationRadiology2000216242710.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl15242Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Kim B, Chiowanich P, Blasbalg R, Kilger A. Ovarian Brenner tumors: MR imaging characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 1147-53. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00136-2OutwaterEKSiegelmanESKimBChiowanichPBlasbalgRKilgerAOvarian Brenner tumors: MR imaging characteristicsMagn Reson Imaging19981611475310.1016/s0730-725x(98)00136-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. Characterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 1997; 38: 572-7. doi: 10.1080/02841859709174389YamashitaYHatanakaYTorashimaMTakahashiMMiyazakiKOkamuraHCharacterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging. A logistic regression analysisActa Radiol199738572710.1080/028418597091743899240680Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bent CL, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Singh N, Sohaib SA, Reznek RH. MRI appearances of borderline ovarian tumours Clin Radiol 2009; 64: 430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.09.011BentCLSahdevARockallAGSinghNSohaibSAReznekRHMRI appearances of borderline ovarian tumoursClin Radiol200964430810.1016/j.crad.2008.09.01119264189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
deSouza NM, O’Neill R, McIndoe GA, Dina R, Soutter WP. Borderline tumors of the ovary: CT and MRI features and tumor markers in differentiation from stage I disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 999-1003. doi: 10.2214/ ajr.184.3.01840999deSouzaNMO’NeillRMcIndoeGADinaRSoutterWPBorderline tumors of the ovary: CT and MRI features and tumor markers in differentiation from stage I diseaseAJR Am J Roentgenol2005184999100310.2214/ajr.184.3.0184099915728632Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maggino T, Gadducci A, D’Addario V, Pecorelli S, Lissoni A, Stella M, et al., Prospective multicenter study on CA 125 in postmenopausal pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54: 117-23. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1179MagginoTGadducciAD’AddarioVPecorelliSLissoniAStellaMet alProspective multicenter study on CA 125 in postmenopausal pelvic massesGynecol Oncol1994541172310.1006/gyno.1994.11798063233Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang H, Zhang GF, He ZY, Li ZY, Zhu M, Zhang GX. Evaluation of primary ad-nexal masses by 3T MRI: categorization with conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Ovarian Res 2012; 5: 33. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-5-33ZhangHZhangGFHeZYLiZYZhuMZhangGXEvaluation of primary ad-nexal masses by 3T MRI: categorization with conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imagingJ Ovarian Res201253310.1186/1757-2215-5-33357631923148860Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
