This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Chang CH, Sibala JL, Fritz SL, Gallagher JH, Dwyer 3rd SJ, Templeton AW. Computed tomographic evaluation of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131: 459-64. 10.2214/ajr.131.3.459ChangCHSibalaJLFritzSLGallagherJHDwyer 3rdSJTempletonAW.Computed tomographic evaluation of the breast19781314596410.2214/ajr.131.3.45998990Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boone JM, Nelson TR, Lindfors KK, Seibert JA. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. Radiol 2001; 221: 657-67. 10.1148/radiol.2213010334BooneJMNelsonTRLindforsKKSeibertJA.Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation20012216576710.1148/radiol.221301033411719660Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kalender, WA, Kolditz D, Steiding C, Ruth V, Lück F, Rößler AC, et al. Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 1081-6. 10.1007/s00330-016-4459-3KalenderWAKolditzDSteidingCRuthVLück F RößlerACTechnical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast2017271081610.1007/s00330-016-4459-327306559Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
New York Koning Corporation, West Henrietta, NY. Koning breast CT. [cited 2017 Aug 14]. Available at http://koninghealth.com/en/kbctNew York Koning CorporationWest HenriettaNY.Koning breastCT.Available athttp://koninghealth.com/en/kbctSearch in Google Scholar
Longo R, Arfelli F, Bellazzini R, Bottigli U, Brez A, Brun F, et al. Towards breast tomography with synchrotron radiation at Elettra: first images. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61: 1634-49. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/4/1634LongoRArfelliFBellazziniRBottigliUBrezABrunFTowards breast tomography with synchrotron radiation at Elettra: first images20166116344910.1088/0031-9155/61/4/163426836274Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sarno A, Mettivier G, Golosio B, Oliva P, Spandre G, Di Lillo F, et al. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector. Phys Med 2016; 32: 681-90. 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.011SarnoAMettivierGGolosioBOlivaPSpandreGDi LilloFImaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector2016326819010.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.01127160829Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Delogu P, Oliva P, Bellazzini R, Brez A, De Ruvo PL, Minuti M, et al. Characterization of Pixirad-1 photon counting detector for X-ray imaging. J Instrum 2016; 11: P01015. 10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/P01015DeloguPOlivaPBellazziniRBrezADe RuvoPLMinutiMCharacterization of Pixirad-1 photon counting detector for X-ray imaging201611P0101510.1088/1748-0221/11/01/P01015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Longo R. Current studies and future perspectives of synchrotron radiation imaging trials in human patients. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A 2016; 809: 13-22. 10.1016/j.nima.2015.10.110ALongoR.Current studies and future perspectives of synchrotron radiation imaging trials in human patients2016809132210.1016/j.nima.2015.10.110AOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rigon L. x-Ray Imaging with Coherent Sources. In: Brahme A, editor. Comprehensive Biomedical Physics. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. p. 193-220.RigonL.x-Ray Imaging with Coherent SourcesBrahmeA2AmsterdamElsevier201419322010.1016/B978-0-444-53632-7.00209-4Search in Google Scholar
Moeckli R, Verdun FR, Fiedler S, Pachoud M, Schnyder P, Valley JF. Objective comparison of image quality and dose between conventional and synchrotron radiation mammography. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 3509-23. 10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/301MoeckliRVerdunFRFiedlerSPachoudMSchnyderPValleyJF.Objective comparison of image quality and dose between conventional and synchrotron radiation mammography20004535092310.1088/0031-9155/45/12/30111131181Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Baldelli P, Taibi A, Tuffanelli A, Gambaccini M. Dose comparison between conventional and quasi-monochromatic systems for diagnostic radiology. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 4135-46. 10.1088/0031-9155/49/17/021BaldelliPTaibiATuffanelliAGambacciniM.Dose comparison between conventional and quasi-monochromatic systems for diagnostic radiology20044941354610.1088/0031-9155/49/17/02115470928Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Veronese A. A proposal for a quality control protocol in breast CT with synchrotron radiation. [Master Thesis]. Trieste: Universita degli Studi di Trieste, Dipartimento di Fisica; 2017.VeroneseA.[Master Thesis]. TriesteUniversita degli Studi di Trieste, Dipartimento di Fisica2017Search in Google Scholar
European Reference Organization for Quality Assured Breast Screening EUREF and Diagnostic Services. European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening. In: European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L, editors. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006. p. 57-166.European Reference Organization for Quality Assured Breast Screening EUREF and Diagnostic Services. European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screeningFourthPerryNBroedersMde WolfCTörnbergSHollandRvon KarsaLLuxembourgOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities200657166Search in Google Scholar
Edyvean S, Jones A. Computed tomography x-ray scanners. In: Measurement of the performance characteristics of the diagnostic x-ray systems used in medicine. IPEM Report n. 32 Part III. York: IPEM; 2003.EdyveanSJonesA.Computed tomography x-ray scannersNew YorkIPEM2003Search in Google Scholar
Koning. User’s manual for Koning breast CT system. West Henrietta, New York: Koning Corporation. [cited 2017 Aug 14]. Available at www.access-data.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf13/P130025c.pdfKoningWest Henrietta, New YorkKoning Corporation. [cited 2017 Aug 14]Available atwww.access-data.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf13/P130025c.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Castelli E, Tonutti M, Arfelli F, Longo R, Quaia E, Rigon L, et al. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique. Radiol 2011; 259: 684-94. 10.1148/radiol.11100745CastelliETonuttiMArfelliFLongoRQuaiaERigonLMammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique20112596849410.1148/radiol.1110074521436089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fedon C, Longo F, Mettivier G, Longo R. GEANT4 for breast dosimetry: parameters optimization study. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60: 311-23. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/16/N311FedonCLongoFMettivierGLongoR.GEANT4 for breast dosimetry: parameters optimization study2015603112310.1088/0031-9155/60/16/N31126267405Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mettivier G, Fedon C, Di Lillo F, Longo R, Sarno A, Tromba G, et al. Glandular dose in breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61: 569-87. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/569MettivierGFedonCDi LilloFLongoRSarnoATrombaGGlandular dose in breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation2016615698710.1088/0031-9155/61/2/56926683710Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bellazzini R, Spandre G, Brez A, Minuti M, Pinchera M, Mozzo P. Chromatic X-ray imaging with a fine pitch CdTe sensor coupled to a large area photon counting pixel ASIC. J Instrum 2013; 8: C02028. 10.1088/1748-0221/8/02/C02028BellazziniRSpandreGBrezAMinutiMPincheraMMozzoP.Chromatic X-ray imaging with a fine pitch CdTe sensor coupled to a large area photon counting pixel ASIC20138C0202810.1088/1748-0221/8/02/C02028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boone JM, Chavez AE. Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics. Med Phys 1996; 23: 1997–2005. 10.1118/1.597899BooneJMChavezAE.Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics1996231997200510.1118/1.5978998994164Open DOISearch in Google Scholar