Identifying the Most Effective Geosite Evaluation Models in Iran Using Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

Ahmadabad S., Hasani P., 2006. What is a meta-analysis?. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Birjand University of Medical Sciences 3: 15–21. AhmadabadS. HasaniP. 2006 What is a meta-analysis? Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Birjand University of Medical Sciences 3 15 21 Search in Google Scholar

Abadi Q.A.A., 2013. Meta-political approach: Capacities and gaps. Journal of Social Sciences 71(8): 82–89. AbadiQ.A.A. 2013 Meta-political approach: Capacities and gaps Journal of Social Sciences 71 8 82 89 Search in Google Scholar

Barba F.J., Tejerina J.R., Rivas V., 1997. Propuesta de un procedimiento para armonizar la valoración de elementos del patrimonio geológico. Zubia 15: 11–20. BarbaF.J. TejerinaJ.R. RivasV. 1997 Propuesta de un procedimiento para armonizar la valoración de elementos del patrimonio geológico Zubia 15 11 20 Search in Google Scholar

Bruschi V.M., Cendrero A., 2005. Geosite evaluation: Can we measure intangible values. Il Quaternario 18(1): 293–306. BruschiV.M. CendreroA. 2005 Geosite evaluation: Can we measure intangible values Il Quaternario 18 1 293 306 Search in Google Scholar

Carrión-Mero P., Loor-Oporto O., Andrade-Ríos H., Herrera-Franco G., Morante-Carballo F., Jaya-Montalvo M., Berrezueta E., 2020. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the “El Sexmo” Tourist Gold Mine (Zaruma, Ecuador) as A Geosite and Mining Site. Resources, 9(3), 28. Carrión-MeroP. Loor-OportoO. Andrade-RíosH. Herrera-FrancoG. Morante-CarballoF. Jaya-MontalvoM. BerrezuetaE. 2020 Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the “El Sexmo” Tourist Gold Mine (Zaruma, Ecuador) as A Geosite and Mining Site Resources 9 3 28 10.3390/resources9030028 Search in Google Scholar

Chingombe W., 2019. Preliminary geomorphosites assessment along the panorama route of Mpumalanga province, South Africa. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 27: 1261–1270. ChingombeW. 2019 Preliminary geomorphosites assessment along the panorama route of Mpumalanga province, South Africa GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 27 1261 1270 10.30892/gtg.27412-431 Search in Google Scholar

Coratza P., Giusti C. 2005. Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. CoratzaP. GiustiC. 2005 Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites Search in Google Scholar

Dowling R., Newsome D., 2018. Chapter 17. Geoheritage and geotourism. In Geoheritage (pp. 305–321). Elsevier Inc. DowlingR. NewsomeD. 2018 Chapter 17. Geoheritage and geotourism In Geoheritage 305 321 Elsevier Inc. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00017-4 Search in Google Scholar

Fassoulas C., Mouriki D., Dimitriou-Nikolakis P., Iliopoulos G., 2012. Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage, 4(3), 177–193. FassoulasC. MourikiD. Dimitriou-NikolakisP. IliopoulosG. 2012 Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management Geoheritage 4 3 177 193 10.1007/s12371-011-0046-9 Search in Google Scholar

Gallo P.S., Lynn E., 1981. The variance accounted for in meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcomes: A reply to Willson. American Psychologist 36(10): 1196–1198. DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1196. GalloP.S. LynnE. 1981 The variance accounted for in meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcomes: A reply to Willson American Psychologist 36 10 1196 1198 10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1196 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

George Street Research, 2006. Geotourism in Scotland – evaluation and development. Phase 2 – Knockan Crag customer survey. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 170 (roame no. F04AC104/2). George Street Research 2006 Geotourism in Scotland – evaluation and development. Phase 2 – Knockan Crag customer survey Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 170 (roame no. F04AC104/2). Search in Google Scholar

Ghanavati E., Karam A., Fakhari S., 2012. Review on process geotorism evolutions and models that used in Iran. Geographical Journal of Territory 9(34): 75–91. GhanavatiE. KaramA. FakhariS. 2012 Review on process geotorism evolutions and models that used in Iran Geographical Journal of Territory 9 34 75 91 Search in Google Scholar

Glass G.V., 2000. Meta-analysis at 25. http://www.gvglass.info/papers/meta25.html GlassG.V. 2000 Meta-analysis at 25 http://www.gvglass.info/papers/meta25.html Search in Google Scholar

Gordon J.E., 2018. Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences 8(4): 136. GordonJ.E. 2018 Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation Geosciences 8 4 136 10.3390/geosciences8040136 Search in Google Scholar

Grandgirard V., 1999. L’évaluation des géotopes. Geologia Insubrica 4: 59–66. GrandgirardV. 1999 L’évaluation des géotopes Geologia Insubrica 4 59 66 Search in Google Scholar

Hose T.A., 1995. Selling the story of Britain's stone. Environmental Interpretation 10(2): 16–17. HoseT.A. 1995 Selling the story of Britain's stone Environmental Interpretation 10 2 16 17 Search in Google Scholar

Kubalíková L., 2013. Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 80–104. KubalíkováL. 2013 Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes Czech Journal of Tourism 2 2 80 104 10.2478/cjot-2013-0005 Search in Google Scholar

Nasrollahi S.N., Mokhtari H., Seyedein M.S., 2013. Meta-analysis: An approach to integration and evaluation of information science and knowledge research. Journal of Information Processing and Management 29(2): 293–331. NasrollahiS.N. MokhtariH. SeyedeinM.S. 2013 Meta-analysis: An approach to integration and evaluation of information science and knowledge research Journal of Information Processing and Management 29 2 293 331 Search in Google Scholar

Ólafsdóttir R., Dowling, R., 2014. Geotourism and geoparks – a tool for geoconservation and rural development in vulnerable environments: a case study from Iceland. Geoheritage, 6(1), 71–87. ÓlafsdóttirR. DowlingR. 2014 Geotourism and geoparks – a tool for geoconservation and rural development in vulnerable environments: a case study from Iceland Geoheritage 6 1 71 87 10.1007/s12371-013-0095-3 Search in Google Scholar

Panizza M., Piacente S., 1993. Geomorphological assets evaluation. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. Supplementband 87: 13–18. PanizzaM. PiacenteS. 1993 Geomorphological assets evaluation Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. Supplementband 87 13 18 Search in Google Scholar

Panizza M., 2009. The geomorphodiversity of the dolomites (Italy): A key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1(1): 33–42. PanizzaM. 2009 The geomorphodiversity of the dolomites (Italy): A key of geoheritage assessment Geoheritage 1 1 33 42 10.1007/s12371-009-0003-z Search in Google Scholar

Pereira P., Pereira D., 2010. Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 16(2): 215–222. PereiraP. PereiraD. 2010 Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 16 2 215 222 10.4000/geomorphologie.7942 Search in Google Scholar

Pereira P., Pereira D., Caetano Alves M.I., 2007. Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho natural park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica 62(3): 159–168. PereiraP. PereiraD. Caetano AlvesM.I. 2007 Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho natural park (Portugal) Geographica Helvetica 62 3 159 168 10.5194/gh-62-159-2007 Search in Google Scholar

Pralong J.P., 2005. A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3): 189–196. PralongJ.P. 2005 A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11 3 189 196 10.4000/geomorphologie.350 Search in Google Scholar

Ranjbaran M., Zamanzadeh S., Sotohian F., 2020. Geotourism attractions of Hormuz Island, Iran. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 28(1): 232–245. RanjbaranM. ZamanzadehS. SotohianF. 2020 Geotourism attractions of Hormuz Island, Iran GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 28 1 232 245 10.30892/gtg.28118-465 Search in Google Scholar

Reynard E., 2005. Géomorphosites et paysages. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3): 181–188. ReynardE. 2005 Géomorphosites et paysages Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11 3 181 188 10.4000/geomorphologie.338 Search in Google Scholar

Reynard E., Panizza M., 2005. Geomorphosites: Definition, assessment and mapping. An introduction. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3): 177–180. ReynardE. PanizzaM. 2005 Geomorphosites: Definition, assessment and mapping. An introduction Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11 3 177 180 10.4000/geomorphologie.337 Search in Google Scholar

Reynard E., Fontana G., Kozlik L., Scapozza C., 2007. A method for assessing the scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62(3): 148–158. ReynardE. FontanaG. KozlikL. ScapozzaC. 2007 A method for assessing the scientific and additional values of geomorphosites Geographica Helvetica 62 3 148 158 10.5194/gh-62-148-2007 Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds J., 2001. Notes to accompany RIGS recording, assessment and designation and notification sheets. In Notes on the UKRIGS Conference. ReynoldsJ. 2001 Notes to accompany RIGS recording, assessment and designation and notification sheets In Notes on the UKRIGS Conference Search in Google Scholar

Sarvestani R.S., 2000. A meta-analysis on the Study of Social Pathology in Iran. Journal of Social Sciences 15: 67–103. SarvestaniR.S. 2000 A meta-analysis on the Study of Social Pathology in Iran Journal of Social Sciences 15 67 103 Search in Google Scholar

Serrano E., González-Trueba J.J., 2005. Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: The Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3): 197–208. SerranoE. González-TruebaJ.J. 2005 Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: The Picos de Europa National Park (Spain) Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11 3 197 208 10.4000/geomorphologie.364 Search in Google Scholar

Somerville J. 2008. Critical factors affecting the assessment of student learning outcomes: A Delphi study of the opinions of community college personnel. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 15(2), 9–19. SomervilleJ. 2008 Critical factors affecting the assessment of student learning outcomes: A Delphi study of the opinions of community college personnel Journal of Applied Research in the Community College 15 2 9 19 Search in Google Scholar

Williams P. L., Webb, C., 1994. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(1), 180–186. WilliamsP. L. WebbC. 1994 The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion Journal of advanced nursing 19 1 180 186 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x8138622 Search in Google Scholar

Wolf F.M., 1986. Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Sage. WolfF.M. 1986 Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis Sage 10.4135/9781412984980 Search in Google Scholar

Yang B., 2002. Meta-analysis research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources 4(3): 296–316. YangB. 2002 Meta-analysis research and theory building Advances in Developing Human Resources 4 3 296 316 10.1177/1523422302043005 Search in Google Scholar

Zanganeh Asadi, M.A., Amirahmadi A., Shayan Yeganeh A.A., 2018. mechanism of protection of proposed Geopark West of Khorasan Razavi by brilha method. Geography and Planning, 22(63), 117–137. Zanganeh AsadiM.A. AmirahmadiA. Shayan YeganehA.A. 2018 mechanism of protection of proposed Geopark West of Khorasan Razavi by brilha method Geography and Planning 22 63 117 137 Search in Google Scholar

Zouros N., 2005. Assessment, protection, and promotion of geomorphological and geological sites in the Aegean area, Greece. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3): 227–234. ZourosN. 2005 Assessment, protection, and promotion of geomorphological and geological sites in the Aegean area, Greece Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11 3 227 234 10.4000/geomorphologie.398 Search in Google Scholar

Zouros N.C., 2007. Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece Case study of the Lesvos island–coastal geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62(3): 169–180. ZourosN.C. 2007 Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece Case study of the Lesvos island–coastal geomorphosites Geographica Helvetica 62 3 169 180 10.5194/gh-62-169-2007 Search in Google Scholar