Geotourism Potentials of Geosites in Durrës Municipality, Albania
03. März 2021
Über diesen Artikel
Online veröffentlicht: 03. März 2021
Seitenbereich: 63 - 73
Eingereicht: 03. Dez. 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2021-0005
Schlüsselwörter
© 2021 Ermiona Braholli et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Public License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Classification of the geosites in different zones based on GAM model_
Geosite | Main Values |
Additional Values |
Zone | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cape of Rodon | GS1 | 2.50 + 2.25 + 2.00 = 6.75 | 2.50 + 4.50 = 7.00 | Z 22 |
St.Pjeter Beach | GS2 | 2.75 + 3.00 + 3.25 = 9.00 | 2.75 + 5.25 = 8.00 | Z 32 |
Kallmi Beach | GS3 | 2.25 + 2.50 + 2.00 = 6.75 | 3.75 + 3.25 = 7.00 | Z 22 |
Rock of Kavaja | GS4 | 2.75 + 2.50 + 2.25 = 7.50 | 2.50 + 3.00 = 5.50 | Z 22 |
Cape of Pali | GS5 | 2.00 + 2.25 + 2.50 = 6.00 | 2.75 + 2.50 = 5.25 | Z 22 |
Geosite assessment of Durrës municipality, based on the GAM method of Vujicić et al_ 2011_
Indicator/Subindicator | Values given by expert (0.00–1.00) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cape of Rodon | St’ Peter beach | Kallmi beach | Rock of Kavaja | Cape of Pali | |
GS 1 | GS 2 | GS 3 | GS 4 | GS 5 | |
Main Values (MV) | |||||
I. Scientific/Educational | |||||
Values ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
Rarity ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Representativeness ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
Knowledge on geoscientific issues ( |
0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
Level of interpretation ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
II. Scenic/Aesthetic values ( |
|||||
Viewpoint ( |
0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Surface ( |
0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Surrounding landscapes and nature ( |
0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Environmental fitting of sites ( |
1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
III. Protection ( |
|||||
Current condition ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Protection level ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Vulnerability ( |
0.25 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Suitable number of visitors ( |
0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Additional Values (AV) | |||||
I. Functional Values (VFn) | |||||
Accessibility ( |
0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.75 |
Additional natural values ( |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Additional anthropogenic values ( |
0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Vicinity of emissive centres |
0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Vicinity of important road network ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
Additional functional values ( |
0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
II. Touristic values (VTr) | |||||
Promotion ( |
0.75 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Organised visits ( |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Vicinity of visitors centres ( |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Interpretative panels ( |
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Number of visitors ( |
0.50 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Tourism infrastructure ( |
0.25 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Tour guide service ( |
0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Hostelry service ( |
0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Restaurant service ( |
0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |