[Asheim B.T., 2007. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences Research 20: 223-241.10.1080/13511610701722846]Search in Google Scholar
[Asheim B.T., Boschma R., Cooke P., 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies 45 (7): 893-904.10.1080/00343404.2010.543126]Search in Google Scholar
[Asheim B.T., Gertler M.S., 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 291-317.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Asheim B.T., Isaksen A., Nauwelaers C., Tödtling F. (eds), 2003. Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781781009659]Search in Google Scholar
[Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2012. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52: 134-152.10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Berg S.-H., Hassink R., 2013. Creative industries from an evolutionary perspective: A critical literature review. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 13.06. Utrecht.]Search in Google Scholar
[Enright M., 2003. Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. In: Bröcker J., Dohse D., Soltwedel R. (eds), Innovation clusters and interregional competition. Springer, Berlin: 99-129.10.1007/978-3-540-24760-9_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Fritsch M., Stephan A., 2005. Regionalization of innovation policy - Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy 34: 1123-1127.10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassink R., 1996. Technology transfer agencies and regional economic development. European Planning Studies 4(2): 167-184.10.1080/09654319608720338]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassink R., Berg S.-H., 2014. Regional innovation support systems and technopoles. In: Oh D.S., Phillips F.Y. (eds), Technopolis: Best practices for science & technology cities. Springer, Heidelberg (forthcoming).10.1007/978-1-4471-5508-9_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Manniche J., 2012. Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge base model. European Planning Studies 20: 1823-1841.10.1080/09654313.2012.723423]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin R., Moodysson J., 2013. Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies 20: 170-187.10.1177/0969776411427326]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin R., Moodysson J., Zukauskaite E., 2011. Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2: 550-568.10.1007/s13132-011-0067-2]Search in Google Scholar
[McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2011. Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. IEB Working Papers, 2011/14, University of Barcelona.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menzel M.-P., Fornahl D., 2010. Cluster life cycles - dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial Corporate Change 19(1): 205-238.10.1093/icc/dtp036]Search in Google Scholar
[Nauwelaers C., Wintjes R., 2003. Towards a new paradigm for innovation policy? In: Asheim B., Isaksen A., Nauwelaers C., Tödtling F. (eds), Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: 193-220.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD, 2010. Regional development policies in OECD countries. OECD, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD, 2011. Regions and innovation policy. OECD reviews of regional innovation. OECD, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plum, O., 2011. Developing biotech products, making cars, creating video games: Disentangling knowledge bases in three German regions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kiel.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plum O., Hassink R., 2011. On the nature and geography of innovation and interactive learning: A case study of the biotechnology industry in the Aachen Technology Region, Germany. European Planning Studies 19: 1141-1163.10.1080/09654313.2011.573128]Search in Google Scholar
[Plum O., Hassink R., 2013. Analytical vs. synthetic knowledge: Which knowledge base configuration drives Southwest Saxony’s automotive firms? European Urban and Regional Studies 20: 206-226.10.1177/0969776412454127]Search in Google Scholar
[Prange H., 2008. Explaining varieties of regional innovation policies in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 15: 39-52.10.1177/0969776407081276]Search in Google Scholar
[Tödtling F., Schneider R., Grillitsch M., Höglinger C., 2011. Constructing regional advantage in the Austrian ICT sector - Towards fine-tuned innovation policies? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2: 533-549.10.1007/s13132-011-0066-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Tödtling F., Trippl M., 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy. Research Policy 34(1): 203-121910.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018]Search in Google Scholar